sux winchester 3500+ 939s...

[gcxbrian]

253x10 vcore set at 1.55

memory running with divider of 5/6
150MHz
2.5-3-3-8

WHY SO SUX....

 

[Jeff7181]

Itz suxxors cuz youz not uber 1337 enuff.

 

[gcxbrian]

🙁 oh man what gayness ! boooooo i got so unlucky 🙁((((((

 

[Duvie]

Huh???

How does 253 HTT with a 5/6 divider which should be a 166 divider equal 150mhz for 300ddr???

It doesnt...How many sticks of ram are you running...

What suxs by the way?? Are you unhappy with the ram speed, overall cpu ocing, and/or the performance of the system???

 

[gcxbrian]

oh maybe its 166 i forgot. i to lazy but i remember its a 5/6 divider. and CPU SUXORS OMGFG!!!1 : (((((((((((((((((((((((( i was aim for 2.6-2.7 : ((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((( SADDDDDDD

 

[Avalon]

Originally posted by: gcxbrian
oh maybe its 166 i forgot. i to lazy but i remember its a 5/6 divider. and CPU SUXORS OMGFG!!!1 : (((((((((((((((((((((((( i was aim for 2.6-2.7 : ((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((( SADDDDDDD

You are an idiot.

 

[Jeff7181]

I swear some people are creating new accounts and making silly posts like this to fvck with the rest of us...

 

[ssvegeta1010]

Try running the memory at a lesser divider, like 133.

 

[CaBoOse999]

I'm so confused, what is going on here!?!?!?

 

[fstime]

3500+ usualy arnt good overclockers. 2.5 seems to be the max for them.

 

[Erok55]

Originally posted by: Avalon

You are an idiot.

 

[Xed]

this has to be a joke thread

 

[dainthomas]

I'm gonna start a thread on how pissed I am that my Barton won't go past 4Ghz on air.

:roll:

 

[Shimmishim]

Originally posted by: BouZouki
3500+ usualy arnt good overclockers. 2.5 seems to be the max for them.

please tell my 3500+ that.

 

[gcxbrian]

you meanies.. im just a nub who never was into ocing. : (((((((( you guys sure know how to hurt a fellow!

 

[Xed]

Originally posted by: gcxbrian
UGHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!1111 I AM TEH GAY
why r u gusy so mean im just noob jeebz its not like i ever had a amd64 before. and i wasnt so into ocing so MEOW AND YOUR FACE > ROFLCOPTERS LOLERSK8!!!!!!!1111 u guys r mean

may you be beaten with the ban stick soon

 

[Zap]

Or, what about my Prescott chip that won't run below ambient temps with the retail HSF?

 

[CaBoOse999]

AGH I'M SO MAD I BOUGHT SOME DDR400 AND THE CLOCK SPEED WONT GO PAST 230!!! I'M SO MAD I'M GOING TO WRITE A LETTER TO THE RAM COMPANY.

 

[fstime]

Originally posted by: Shimmishim

Originally posted by: BouZouki
3500+ usualy arnt good overclockers. 2.5 seems to be the max for them.

please tell my 3500+ that.

I was talking about the winchester.

 

[fireontheway]

another useless post. 😉

 

[thriemus]

I have stated this before but I had trouble in the 25xx range and went straight to 26xx and can get 2651 but i run 2640 for safetys sake as I dont want to go over the 10% vcore o/c.

 

[gcxbrian]

that makes no sense

 

[fAlCoNNiAn]

i get the urge to beat my computer screen with a bat after reading this stupid tread.

 

[gcxbrian]

nerds and geeks pwn me!

 

[imported_michaelpatrick33]

Originally posted by: Zap
Or, what about my Prescott chip that won't run below ambient temps with the retail HSF?

Nothing like defying the laws of physics. Great line Zap. Gee a 1.8Ghrtz $150 dollar processor equaling a FX-53 costing 650 dollars (2500 on the 3500+ makes up for the L2 cache differnce). That sucks! I should have FX-57 speeds on my soon to purchase 2800+ on stock voltage with passive cooling and it better cost 89.00 bucks or I am going to file a complaint with the BBB against AMD. ;those scumsucking, cheating, skywriting s.o.b.'s.