Matt-hole,
You really are a piece of work. Your big "comeback" is a post which incorrectly states "Me Matt, me spell good". Ha, ha, ha, you couldn't even proof read your own typing before bitching about someone elses. Then you try to inflate your perceived importance by stating "I've provided facts", another false statement, every one of your posts in this thread has been your own narrow minded opinion. Oh yeah, nice unbiased link there in your last post, girlfriend.
Andaval,
In a free society, your statement "
Yes, it's possible that an SUV makes you safer in a normal accident than if you were in another car. Unlike a seat belt, this is to the detriment of the other people. This is what makes it morally irresponsible, if not repugnant" makes absolutely no sense. Based on your statement, everyone should be riding around in open air vehicles with absolutely no crash protection just so that the passengers in all vehicles involved are injured equally? That is absolutely laughable. You say SUV's and large vehicles lead to an "arms race", well your reasoning would lead to a "foot race" because any vehicle capable of injuring a pedestrian would be "too big and dangerous" to be allowed on the road.
There are hundreds of vehicles which are legally allowed to operate on US roads. Small, medium, large, they're all available for purchase to the general public, pick what you want and buy it. Someone with a small car can say "your vehicle is too large, it will cause too much damage to my vehicle" while someone with a larger vehicle can say "your vehicle is too small, it doesn't provide sufficient crash protection". The coin has two sides.
And the analogy to guns and weapons is idiotic. Who is the more dangerous person in this scenario: a gun collector who uses semi-automatic weapons for competitions or a 19 year old crack addict with a knife standing outside a quicky mart? It's all in the person who is using the items.
And thankyou for pointing me to Harpers.org, I mistakenly thought you meant Harpers Bazaar. After visiting the Harpers.org website and reading the last months topics ("Estimated percentage change in the fuel efficiency of an S.U.V. if it flies a small American flag from its antenna "), I actually have more respect for the opinions of the soccer moms in Harpers Bazaar.
Large vehicles have been around since the invention of the automobile, why are so many people jumping on the "I hate SUV's" bandwagon? Can't figure out what to like or dislike by yourselves, need everyone elses opinions? What will be the hot thing to bash next, computers which are way too fast? Or how about high speed internet access, who needs that much bandwidth for themselves, wasteful pigs.
Wow, thanks for informing me that I'm a bad American, maybe I'll get depressed for a while, okay I'm over it.
Like I said before, if people are terrified of larger vehicles on the road with them, then they have absolutely no right being allowed to drive. And you had better watch out if you go outside because there might be a really big jet flying over your house. If one of those crashes it can really cause a lot of damage, maybe they should be outlawed and everybody should fly in 2 seat Cessna's.
(Psst, Andaval, the comment about a lifer was a joke about your signature. A lifer is a term for someone who is serving a life sentence in prison and will never be free, get it now?)