• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Surprise Surprise A Rich Conservative (not the poor) is MOOCHING!!!!!!

Indus

Lifer
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/07/08/tom-selleck-water-california_n_7754716.html

Tom Selleck steals (mooches) water off public hydrant to water his home, lawn and avocado farm. That's our water.. water that is for public use in case of emergencies.. 😵

WHERE IS THE FOX NEWS OUTRAGE? Oh right he gave lots of dollars to Romney so people would not mooch off the government but he's the moocher..

Is there any more hypocrisy than a Rich Republican Conservative? They pretend they don't want moochers feeding off the government because they want to steal the funds or in this case water all for themselves..
 
Last edited:
Maybe for the same reason that I, also a registered Independent, voted for Obama, twice? Still doesn't make me a Democrat.

Stop being a moron.

Why aren't you calling fox news a moron and a hypocrite when Tom is mooching and refuses to listen to cease and desist order by the court?
 
Why aren't you calling fox news a moron and a hypocrite when Tom is mooching and refuses to listen to cease and desist order by the court?
Because he's not actually a Republican so your thread is heading for self-ownership of 2015 nominations. Congrats. It takes a special person.
 
You totally did not offer any proof of your argument.

He supported Romney with money. By that very definition he is supporter of anti-mooching ideology. Remember you vote for someone, you get the entire package. So he's a republican.

He stole the public water. That makes his ideology in clear contrast to his actions.

He's a hypocrite.

Do you want a chart or is that beyond comprehension for you?

At no point was this thread ever about me but if you want to, go ahead fill it with insults, see like I care. I'm not in hot water over this.. Tom Selleck is. 😉
 
But if you're suggesting to this thread should be the Rich are moochers, that too applies. Is that what you're get across?
 
But if you're suggesting to this thread should be the Rich are moochers, that too applies. Is that what you're get across?
Do you mean like when some forum jerkoff gloms on to one example and tries to smear all the rest in the process? Have you ever heard of the term "logical fallacy?" Hint: That's one of them.

Your thread sucks. Your reasoning sucks. Come back with a valid bitch or else you become the bitch.
 
Remember you vote for someone, you get the entire package. So he's a republican.

Wait, really? So if I vote for some asshole who is less of an asshole than the asshole he is running against I now all of a sudden agree with all of the assholes issues?
 
Look at post #16. Your entire argument is logical fallacy ^2.

What you're arguing is like arguing Confederate Flag is not Racist.
 
Stupidity? Like I should believe Nixon, "I'm not a crook!" *laugh*

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Mitt_Romney_presidential_campaign_endorsements,_2012

Scroll down to Entertainers and Artists

Donations/ Endorsments (Actions) speak louder than words.
Does it really have to be explained to you? Independents can lean right or left. I tend to lean more left in most instances, Selleck leans right. It doesn't make me a Democrat and it doesn't make Selleck a Republican.

Now stop being a dumbass...or continue being a dumbass, I really don't care.
 
Then why did he donate to Romney? 🙄
9.0pt
Your argument tastes like chicken!

Next!
many people will donate to a cause/party/person because of what it benefits.

Many also cover their bases by donating to both sides.

How many rich movie folks in the affluent areas of CA have a D vs R beside their name. Now look at their lawns.

They are the ones that are screaming about the down trodden. Yet where is their $$ going.

Are they sacrificing?
 
Wait, really? So if I vote for some asshole who is less of an asshole than the asshole he is running against I now all of a sudden agree with all of the assholes issues?

We as voters do get the entire package even if we don't agree with some of them.

Ask yourself this, would there have been an Iraq war if someone other than a few warmongers were elected honestly?
 
Buzzfeed vs. Tom Selleck's own public admission?

omg. Which one should be believed?

Sheesh. Keep up the stupidity. You're going deeper and deeper down the self-ownage hole.
You're being willfully disingenuous. A simple Google search shows Selleck is frequently mentioned as either Republican or conservative. For example:
http://www.backstage.com/news/in-left-leaning-business-conservative-actors-feel-marginalized/

... There are well-known conservative actors—including Gary Sinise, Tom Selleck, Patricia Heaton, James Woods, Robert Davi, James Belushi, Dennis Miller, and Sylvester Stallone—but according to Morris, their numbers are far fewer than those in the left-wing camp and, more important, they simply don't have the clout. ...
Also, he reportedly contributed to both McCain and Bush, and a site with Selleck quotes included a quote of him saying he is conservative. While "conservative" and "Republican" aren't 100% synonymous, they are very closely aligned in spirit.

That said, this thread fails. One cannot tar all "Rich Republicans" based on the actions of one individual, especially for something fairly petty like this. The title is way over the top. Besides, if one wants to show "Rich Republicans ... are MOOCHERS!!!!!!," there are far better examples than this.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top