Originally posted by: spidey07
Originally posted by: yowolabi
Originally posted by: spidey07
Originally posted by: CPA
Payback for CNN's blatant Pro-Obama position.
It's funny because it's true.
It's neither funny nor true. I invite you give a logical explanation for how CNN benefits from this.
As a matter of fact, it hurts CNN more than it helps them. Tell me, do you think that Obama hiring Oprah onto his staff would help or hurts ABC?
It benefits CNN because now they have somebody inside on the administration and Gupta can give all the juicy stories exclusively to CNN. He may not be employed by the communist news network anymore but you can bet he'll still collaborate.
Think man, think.
You're not thinking at all, if you concluded that the surgeon general has any sort of inside information that makes this beneficial for CNN. The fact is the revenue they lose from having a popular employee hired away from them, cannot be compensated for in the manner you describe. The surgeon general almost never makes news, and certainly doesn't have access to anything juicy.
Moreover, if Obama wanted to give CNN inside stories, why wouldn't he simply leak the stories to them directly instead of using the freaking Surgeon General as a mole. You think that presidential administrations don't have someone assigned to leak stories to the press, someone both closer to the president and who's better at knowing what to leak? Why would going through Sanjay be desirable or more efficient.
Your conspiracy theories don't even have internal logic. You're really not making sense here.