Interesting article:
http://arstechnica.com/securit...in-pwn2own-contest.ars
Its pretty damn impresive that chrome is so new and its so secure. I had no idea it had any type of sandboxing protection. I knew IE7 came out with sandbox protection but it only worked with Vista x64 if i remember correctly. Apparently it wasn't enough 😉. They also don't tell you exactly the version of browswer/os they were using in each instance. Its to bad because i'm interested if they were using like the latest verison of ie..8 or were they using ie7. Were they using the latest version of firefox or were the using a beta? Were the using a chrome beta?
Its also interesting, at the end of the article, one of the hackers states that windows is harder to hack than OSX. Kind of suprising. OSX has a FreeBSD Core. They don't compare it to linux which is to bad.
Ncage
http://arstechnica.com/securit...in-pwn2own-contest.ars
Its pretty damn impresive that chrome is so new and its so secure. I had no idea it had any type of sandboxing protection. I knew IE7 came out with sandbox protection but it only worked with Vista x64 if i remember correctly. Apparently it wasn't enough 😉. They also don't tell you exactly the version of browswer/os they were using in each instance. Its to bad because i'm interested if they were using like the latest verison of ie..8 or were they using ie7. Were they using the latest version of firefox or were the using a beta? Were the using a chrome beta?
Its also interesting, at the end of the article, one of the hackers states that windows is harder to hack than OSX. Kind of suprising. OSX has a FreeBSD Core. They don't compare it to linux which is to bad.
Ncage