Discussion Supreme Court leaker search comes up as empty as their hearts

[brycejones]

If I'm not mistaken that second search is still ongoing so don't count OJ out yet!

Are we sure OJ isn't Alito wearing a mask?

 

[cytg111]

These judges could shoot someone on fifth av and never face an investigation.

 

[ivwshane]

Why can’t congress (ignoring the fact that Dems don’t have a majority) simply pass a law that says no business shall be considered as a person? I would love to see the justices pretzel logic to say otherwise.

 

[HomerJS]

Why can’t congress (ignoring the fact that Dems don’t have a majority) simply pass a law that says no business shall be considered as a person? I would love to see the justices pretzel logic to say otherwise.

Think practically corporations are people. Try enforcing a citizens arrest on a corporation

Think the state could arrest a corporation? Would they just arrest all members of the board?

 

[ivwshane]

Think practically corporations are people. Try enforcing a citizens arrest on a corporation

Think the state could arrest a corporation? Would they just arrest all members of the board?

?I’m not following you?

 

[Pens1566]

Think practically corporations are people. Try enforcing a citizens arrest on a corporation

Think the state could arrest a corporation? Would they just arrest all members of the board?

Or really mindfuck them, state that corporations don't have a heartbeat.

 

[HomerJS]

?I’m not following you?

If someone commits a crime and there are no police available citizens arrest is lawful

 

[ivwshane]

If someone commits a crime and there are no police available citizens arrest is lawful

Are you just explaining why treating corporations like people is dumb and impractical?

 

[HomerJS]

Are you just explaining why treating corporations like people is dumb and impractical?

Yes

 

[HomerJS]

Transparency my ass
Supreme Court did not disclose financial relationship with Michael Chertoff, the expert brought in to review leak probe | CNN Politics

 

[fskimospy]

Transparency my ass
Supreme Court did not disclose financial relationship with Michael Chertoff, the expert brought in to review leak probe | CNN Politics

I mean everything you needed to know about how much they cared about finding the leaker is that they decided to take whatever the justices told them as true without any further investigation.

‘did you rob that bank?’

‘no’

‘works for me! Guess we’ll never solve this one!’

 

[ivwshane]

Transparency my ass
Supreme Court did not disclose financial relationship with Michael Chertoff, the expert brought in to review leak probe | CNN Politics

Sounds like an excellent time for some legislation and oversight to be passed.

 

[allisolm]

"Supreme Court justices used personal emails for work"

Oh, no! Say it isn't so! The Republican remedy for such a heinous breach, to be consistent with their past recommendations, would be to lock 'em up! I'll be waiting, but not with bated breath, for them to apply that remedy in this case.

https://www.cnn.com/2023/02/04/politics/supreme-court-email-burn-bags-leak-investigation/index.html

 

[hal2kilo]

Sounds like an excellent time for some legislation and oversight to be passed.

And the conundrum, a separate branch of our government.