Supreme court ends evection moratorium

[Greenman]

Some cities have laws against living in a car that were in effect before the pandemic. I agree with some others who protested the laws that it's unfair in times of more homeless people back then. And now with covid D on the rise coupled with the SCOTUS ruling.

At least there are some guarded parking lots and other guarded areas in the country for sleeping in a car. In some cases that's against the law but how quickly the authorities react to it if at all can vary I suppose. Would be interesting to know how many conservatives here think or would venture to post that the authorities should swoop in on those parking lots where it's illegal before the end of the night and round up a bunch of people even the guards.

They are for the SCOTUS ruling so why fail to be consistent in a case like I just described of where the new homeless sleep in cars? It would apply outside CA and some other states that still have moratoriums against evictions which the SCOTUS ruling doesn't affect. It's just states that don't have or have lifted the moratoriums where evictions can now take place. But everyone knows that already, just trying to be clear about it as far as the possibility of a big increase in areas for people to sleep in their cars.

edit - relax, I know conservatives will say the authorities will give advanced notice and warnings for weeks maybe even months before taking action. But if the homeless living in their cars refuse to leave at the end of the grace period? Those scenes would make national headlines if hundreds of thousands wind up in that position as a result of the Supreme Court ruling.

Perhaps it's to early in the morning, I can't make sense out of this. I don't see how sleeping in a car equates to the eviction moratorium. Or how enforcement of one equates to the other.