SuperPi...

bob4432

Lifer
Sep 6, 2003
11,726
45
91
just out of curiosity, what does super use? is it more cpu or ram? the reason i am asking is becase both my 1.7GHz P4 and 2.8c P4 have nearly the same times to get to 1M....is it a smt/smp app?

baffled....
 

hmmzzz

Member
May 15, 2005
35
0
0
I would think for the most part brute clock speed ... Guess not then after seeing your results ...

 

coomar

Banned
Apr 4, 2005
2,431
0
0
its clockspeed to a certain point, 32m is used to test changes in bandwith changes (you can use the lower ones but its easiest to see on 32m)
 

bob4432

Lifer
Sep 6, 2003
11,726
45
91
Originally posted by: hmmzzz
I would think for the most part brute clock speed ... Guess not then after seeing your results ...

could you run it to 1M and see what you get?
 

bob4432

Lifer
Sep 6, 2003
11,726
45
91
SuperPi appears to not be smt/smp aware as it shows my cpu usage at 50%, so i guess it is seeing 2x1.4...next time i reboot i will turn off ht and see if that helps.
 

bob4432

Lifer
Sep 6, 2003
11,726
45
91
Originally posted by: bob4432
SuperPi appears to not be smt/smp aware as it shows my cpu usage at 50%, so i guess it is seeing 2x1.4...next time i reboot i will turn off ht and see if that helps.

i have to quote myself, i turned off ht and the time is ~3 seconds more...can somebody explain how a 1.7GHz P4 can beat a 2.8GHz P4 (either in ht or non ht mode)? is it just to 1M that this will happen? i would bench but i am currently running my 1.7GHz through a long period of prime95 since it is a new build from parts i had laying around the house.
 

Bona Fide

Banned
Jun 21, 2005
1,901
0
0
Well 1M is a [relatively] low value, so changes won't be as apparent. Try 32M and you should see significant differences. :)
 

imported_burningrave101

Senior member
Jul 28, 2004
449
0
0
SuperPI is not currently multithreaded. You have to run two instances of it to get 100% load on multi processor/dual core/HyperThreading enabled systems.
 

bob4432

Lifer
Sep 6, 2003
11,726
45
91
i did 16M and the 2.8 finished in ~20min and the 1.7 finished in ~38mins, so there was a significant difference with the higher value :)