SuperPI Contest!!!

[Zebo]

Originally posted by: zakee00

Originally posted by: Zebo

Originally posted by: Punk234
My time is 27m 51s with my 3200+ @ 2.75ghz

Screen

cpuz mem? that chip should do 3.0

what do you mean? ive never heard of a winchester going above 2.8ghz stable. if you have, give me a link

3165 on air

Bunch over 3200 with other methods

 

[Punk234]

Originally posted by: Zebo

Originally posted by: Punk234
I got a new time 27m 28s
with my new overclock of 2.78 ghz
can't get 32M calculation to work higher than 278HTT but can get 1M to work up to 285HTT

That's really nice...where did you purchase your chip?

Thanks, I got the chip from zipzoomfly

 

[zakee00]

Originally posted by: Zebo

Originally posted by: zakee00

Originally posted by: Zebo

Originally posted by: Punk234
My time is 27m 51s with my 3200+ @ 2.75ghz

Screen

cpuz mem? that chip should do 3.0

what do you mean? ive never heard of a winchester going above 2.8ghz stable. if you have, give me a link

3165 on air

Bunch over 3200 with other methods

Thats not very practical, because they are using 1.8v to get to 3GHz. That would shorten the lifespan of your chip by QUITE a lot..right? If it dosn't im going to look into watercooling for sure .

 

[Zebo]

I don't like voltage on A64's so you're asking wrong person. 1.65 max for newcastles and 1.55 max for winchesters (air). The Bartons and tbreds you could pump 2.2 though no problem...but I've heard people killing mem controller with too much A64 volts.

Some of those guys over there are dishonest and have no problem RMAing stuff they break... I won't do that and I want stuff to last...so I keep things cool and low volts

Edit Still Punk should have no problem.. I mean he's already 2850 with only 1.45...give it another 0.1

 

[Stormgiant]

Those are VERY RARE chips...

Maybe with the improvement of yieldings things getter better.

Right now, "normal" is 2550-2650, many are getting 2700, and some 2800. Period. To get over that some luck is in order and temps like the ones of that guy at 3100...

 

[RalfHutter]

Originally posted by: Zebo

Originally posted by: RalfHutter
43min46sec

It's a 2.0GHz Dothan running at 2.0GHz on an AOpem 855 desktop board.

I thought dothan could beat A64's in pi...

Here's what I saw.. 35:22 with 2.0Ghz A64. Albeit with 222HTT with 2-2-2-7 1T but 8 seconds faster???

interesting... are you running win2k? whats mem?

Would you mind running 1M Ralf? Maybe it differs accross tests. From what I've seen Dothan beats 64 at same speed with 1M..

I got 42sec@2.0

1M = 40sec at default speed. Memory is 1GB Mushkin PC3200 Level 2 @ 333Mhz, 2-2-2-5. WinXP sp2.

 

[Zebo]

Definetly odd Ralf. I would have though superpi scaled no matter the iterations used... seems not. Dothan superior at 1M, A64 @32M

 

[Jojo1971]

Originally posted by: Jojo1971
34m 25s

:camera:

UPDATE: 33m 34s at 3.6ghz

:camera:

 

[stardust]

Any other Dothan's out there willing to reveal their pi times? Hopefully it's +2.5ghz. I heard it can rival the FX55 in times with good memory. Anyone with the new dothan 915 chipsets?

Something like This

 

[zakee00]

Originally posted by: Jojo1971

Originally posted by: Jojo1971
34m 25s

:camera:

UPDATE: 33m 34s at 3.6ghz

:camera:

Not counted, the time needs to be the VERY last one displayed. aka "PI Value output" time. Before you run the test, drag out the superpi window so it dosnt cut off this time.

 

[THUGSROOK]

Originally posted by: Jojo1971

Originally posted by: Jojo1971
34m 25s

:camera:

UPDATE: 33m 34s at 3.6ghz

:camera:

your screenshot is missing the bottom line of your test results

 

[Sc4freak]

Some tips while running it:

Do a clean reboot, start up SuperPi and then enter TaskManager. Go to the "Processes" tab and end ALL non-essential processes, besides Task Manager and SuperPi. Once you have done that, end explorer.exe and finally end taskmgr.exe. Start the SuperPi run, take a screenshot of it, Hit [ctrl]+[alt]+[del] and under the "Applications" tab click "New Task..." type "explorer", sans quotes. Then hit Ok and it'll start up explorer again. Save your results and then do the above several times until you get a lower time (the times seem to vary with every run).

 

[slulfyer06]

27minutes 04seconds

this is only on 3.96Ghz since my temps are a little high right now...i'll try to get back when i have it back up on 4.2 where my 1M time was 29seconds...proof for that if anyone is interested is on http://www.extremeoverclocking.com

http://www.at3k.com/grant/32Msuperpi.jpg

 

[THUGSROOK]

Originally posted by: THUGSROOK

Originally posted by: THUGSROOK
34.59 @ 3.5ghz

Update: now 33.59 @ 3.6ghz

Update: now 32.43 @ 3.8ghz

 

[Zebo]

Thugs are you using the "optimized" p4 superpi?

Those P4 scores are getting up there.

 

[zakee00]

P4's stole the top 3 slots :Q!
we need an uber1337 amd FX-55 @ 3.6GHz...

 

[THUGSROOK]

Originally posted by: Zebo
Thugs are you using the "optimized" p4 superpi?

i donno ?

 

[FriedRiceBob]

Here's my $40 mobo/cpu combo budget entry.

Duron 1.6 @ 2010mhz 57:22

and my contestent for last...same combo, multi changed in windows (so much fun)

Duron 1.6 @ 447mhz 3:01:07

 

[Stormgiant]

Just one heads up.

The Super Pi benchmark is very memory dependent in quality and quantity.

While on the 1M these two variables sometimes do not accours, when running 32M bench is well seen.
Those who have faster ram will get a better result then the ones with slow memory, and those who have >1GB on the system will notice a much smaller use of the disk than the ones with <1GB ( like me ).
I have very fast ram, but lack the quantity. Althought I can run 1M in only 31seg @2600, I need 30:35 to complete the 32M. Gonna optimize more the system in order to get better result on 32M.

 

[Insomniak]

Why not just have people post their system specs? It's pretty much the same thing, unless you suck at optimizing windows...

 

[Zebo]

Originally posted by: THUGSROOK

Originally posted by: Zebo
Thugs are you using the "optimized" p4 superpi?

i donno ?

http://www.hardforum.com/showt...?t=840858&page=1&pp=20
Ya read first post thugs, DL pentium 4 patch per instruction....time shoudl improve... I'd expect your 3.8 to equal 4.0 press when done.

 

[THUGSROOK]

prescott patched super_pi will not run on my system.

 

[SrGuapo]

I get 30:55 with my 3200+ winchester at 2.4GHz. I didn't do anything special like a clean reboot, clear out the processes or anything, though...

 

[Jojo1971]

Originally posted by: zakee00

Originally posted by: Jojo1971

Originally posted by: Jojo1971
34m 25s

:camera:

UPDATE: 33m 34s at 3.6ghz

:camera:

Not counted, the time needs to be the VERY last one displayed. aka "PI Value output" time. Before you run the test, drag out the superpi window so it dosnt cut off this time.

okay. i ran it again.. 34m 28s at 3.6ghz


:camera:

 

[THUGSROOK]

im disappointed in the lack of participants in this thread
|H|OCP is kickin our collective butts....