• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Supermodel Naomi Campbell Wins Major Privacy Case (Major implications for scumbag papers in GB)

Hmmm, guess it isn't so big afterall
rolleye.gif
 


<< good for her, but really its not that big of a deal to me. >>


I know it isn' to YOU😉

But in Great Britain, it changes everything concerning the paparzzi and them intruding on the lives of celebrities (I think they go too far myself). It is a landmark case there.
 
Thats why they call it Narcotics Anonymous. One of the cornerstones of these 12 step programs is privacy and confidentiality. She only got $5k tho.
 


<<

<< good for her, but really its not that big of a deal to me. >>


I know it isn' to YOU😉

But in Great Britain, it changes everything concerning the paparzzi and them intruding on the lives of celebrities (I think they go too far myself). It is a landmark case there.
>>



YAY! ???
 
the funny thing is your probably gonna get people in here saying she shouldnt have done drugs in the first place.
 


<< "One of her colleagues said supermodels don't get out of bed for less than $10,000, so she hasn't even got enough to pull back the bedclothes." >>



Bwuahahahahahahahaha!!!!!!!!!!!!!

BTW, I think she should have won the case, and I hope it does set a precedent (although, I doubt it actually will). Unlike many of the other tooting celebrities that have made the news, she didn't go to court, wasn't convicted of anything, and privately sought help for the problem. Under those circumstances, it is NONE of the public's business.

Russ, NCNE
 
I agree Russ. She was seeking help for a substance abuse problem, and these low-lifes make a mockery of her for trying to do the right thing. I hope something is changed.
 


<< Thats why they call it Narcotics Anonymous. One of the cornerstones of these 12 step programs is privacy and confidentiality. She only got $5k tho. >>



Not like she needs the money, I think it's more a matter of telling them off, to let them know the law doesn't tolerate that kind of intrusion. If they repeat it, even with minor celebrities, they can get much harder penalties due to the warning this case gave them.
 
Back
Top