Suit filed over Nano scratches

[NFS4]

Is anyone surprised?

 

[Baked]

Some people are getting compensation from the class suit already. I imagine they'll file another suit w/ the 5G iPods.

 

[DevilsAdvocate]

Originally posted by: NFS4
Is anyone surprised?

You put out a crappy product, and what can you expect? Are we to believe Apple did not know these were bad?

 

[Kelvrick]

I thought they were fixing em?

 

[spidey07]

grrrr...

I thought this would be a cool article about merging biology and technology on a small scale.
:|

 

[GTaudiophile]

Jebus! I HATE AMERICAN GREED! Why isn't it enough to go after a refund for the Nano alone??? Why go after company profits??? Gawd! Fvck 'em. I hope the judge laughs in their faces.

Just another example of how everything in this country is being fvcked up by greed!!!

 

[jfall]

I'd say repost, but the other thread about this was posted the exact same minute lol

 

[spidey07]

Originally posted by: jfall
I'd say repost, but the other thread about this was posted the exact same minute lol

LOL.

Except on different days.

 

[gopunk]

Originally posted by: GTaudiophile
Jebus! I HATE AMERICAN GREED! Why isn't it enough to go after a refund for the Nano alone??? Why go after company profits??? Gawd! Fvck 'em. I hope the judge laughs in their faces.

Just another example of how everything in this country is being fvcked up by greed!!!

statutes are enacted for a reason... if apple violated the statutes, why shouldn't they have to pay?

 

[her34]

pictures of scratches?

 

[ironcrotch]

oH MY GOD, i'm gonna sue Honda cuz my civic has scratches!

 

[ironcrotch]

My windows disk got a scratch on it to, who wants to sue the cd manufacturers with me

 

[illusion88]

IF you bought it, and it got scratched through normal use you would want a replacement or a a refund. Is that so hard to understand Ironcrotch?

 

[BRObedoza]

ipod's been a scratch magnet since gen 1.

 

[ironcrotch]

Originally posted by: illusion88
IF you bought it, and it got scratched through normal use you would want a replacement or a a refund. Is that so hard to understand Ironcrotch?

I have 2 iPods, and they scratch, so what, sh!t like this is a fact of life? The face of my watch scratches, my new car has scratches in the paint, I buy a music CD and that sh!t scratches like a monther, and my shoes are a little scuffed. And that was only through normal use :disgust:, I'm just gonna sue every car manufacturer cuz my car needs a tune up. Should last forever, since I'm not really doing anything with it, just using it every damn day.

 

[jfall]

This is because most of the people buying IPOD nano's are attention wh0res.. they are buying it for show over functionality so it means everything to them that it stays in pristine condition

 

[smack Down]

Originally posted by: sleepmachine
ipod's been a scratch magnet since gen 1.

Yup, apple should have been sued sooner but the white doesn't show the scratches as easly. There claim that the nano is the same as earlyer ipods might come back to bite them in the ass.

 

[deejayshakur]

sue for dust too? not that i particularly like apple.

 

Ridiculous.

 

[ViRGE]

Originally posted by: GTaudiophile
Why isn't it enough to go after a refund for the Nano alone? Why go after company profits?

And this is what kills the legitimacy of the suit, IMHO. It's one thing to want a refund/replacement, that I could support, but to ask for a chunk of the company's profits it just profiteering and dishonest.

 

[DainBramaged]

Originally posted by: NFS4
Is anyone surprised?

About time.

 

[NFS4]

Originally posted by: DainBramaged

Originally posted by: NFS4
Is anyone surprised?

About time.

About time?

Should I sue Toyota if my brand new Lexus LS430 gets paint chips on the front bumper and hood from rocks kicked up on the highway?

 

[aphex]

As someone who has owned a 15gb 3g and currently a Nano, i can assure you that the nano scratches CONSIDERABLY easier than my old 15gb model.

 

[smack Down]

Originally posted by: ViRGE

Originally posted by: GTaudiophile
Why isn't it enough to go after a refund for the Nano alone? Why go after company profits?

And this is what kills the legitimacy of the suit, IMHO. It's one thing to want a refund/replacement, that I could support, but to ask for a chunk of the company's profits it just profiteering and dishonest.

It is a class action lawsuit. For a laywer not to seek any and all money he can get would be unethical and could get him sued.

 

[Lyfer]

Are they insane scratches that make the device unusable? Or just "minor" scratches?