I am looking for a answer to a challenge for dividing a network into several subnets for certain traffic, devices. Problem is when using a subnet calculator what i want is according to the calculator not possible, but there must be a logical solution may hope.
For example. We have a network with 192.168.0.0/16
I would like to divide this network into several subnets, let's say 10 subnets.
192.168.0.0/24
192.168.1.0/24
192.168.2.0/24
192.168.3.0/21 -subnetmask: 255.255.248.0 divided into: 192.168.3.0/24
192.168.4.0/24
192.168.5.0/24
192.168.6.0/24
192.168.7.0/24
these devices stay all in the same vlan
192.168.8.0/24
192.168.9.0/24
etc
According to the calculator the iprange of the 192.168.3.0/21 starts with ipadres 192.168.0.0 and not 192.168.3.0 till 192.168.7.0
Is this correct must i divide the larger subnets into 192.X.X.X/21 and cannot stay in the 192.168.x.x subnet?
I need 4 /24 subnets and 5 larger subnets like more then 2046 devices but within a subnet are devices where the third number be different so i can easally see which devices are ipnumbers given
Device group a then has 192.168.2.0
devicegroup b then: 192.168.3.0
etc
Is this logical are must this be solved otherwise?
For example. We have a network with 192.168.0.0/16
I would like to divide this network into several subnets, let's say 10 subnets.
192.168.0.0/24
192.168.1.0/24
192.168.2.0/24
192.168.3.0/21 -subnetmask: 255.255.248.0 divided into: 192.168.3.0/24
192.168.4.0/24
192.168.5.0/24
192.168.6.0/24
192.168.7.0/24
these devices stay all in the same vlan
192.168.8.0/24
192.168.9.0/24
etc
According to the calculator the iprange of the 192.168.3.0/21 starts with ipadres 192.168.0.0 and not 192.168.3.0 till 192.168.7.0
Is this correct must i divide the larger subnets into 192.X.X.X/21 and cannot stay in the 192.168.x.x subnet?
I need 4 /24 subnets and 5 larger subnets like more then 2046 devices but within a subnet are devices where the third number be different so i can easally see which devices are ipnumbers given
Device group a then has 192.168.2.0
devicegroup b then: 192.168.3.0
etc
Is this logical are must this be solved otherwise?