• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Stupid question but...

  • Thread starter Thread starter Q
  • Start date Start date
Q

Q

Lifer
How come no bicycles are FWD? I'm being serious, why have they always been RWD? What is the advantage?
 
FWD would have massive torque steer. Imagine: your try to pedal in a turn, only to have the bottom-front of the bike fly out from under you.

Physics way: the force from the tire would not be directed 100% towards the center of mass.
 
There have been some all wheel drive bikes. I think some of BMW's large touring bikes had all wheel drive.

There's also some kit to let you drive both wheels of a dirtbike, they found a way to eleminate the torque steer (counterrotating drive shafts or something) so you can get more traction.
 
Originally posted by: Quintox
How come no bicycles are FWD? I'm being serious, why have they always been RWD? What is the advantage?
Click to expand...

Because FWD is a technologically inferior alternative? Care to give any reasons why someone should even consider it?
 
Originally posted by: soydios
FWD would have massive torque steer. Imagine: your try to pedal in a turn, only to have the bottom-front of the bike fly out from under you.

Physics way: the force from the tire would not be directed 100% towards the center of mass.
Click to expand...

Yeah and try pedaling uphill with a FWD bike.
 
Maybe I'm missing something here, but I don't think it would work to have a chain hooked up to the front tire... since the front tire turns, the chain would either restrict turning or loosen up and fall off.

EDIT: Ah, I see LS21 realized this.
 
Originally posted by: soydios
FWD would have massive torque steer. Imagine: your try to pedal in a turn, only to have the bottom-front of the bike fly out from under you.

Physics way: the force from the tire would not be directed 100% towards the center of mass.
Click to expand...
Not to mention that putting the bike chain to a wheel that pivots would probably cause lots of problems. 😉
Unless you can solve that pesky problem of matter (generally) being unable to pass through other matter, in which case you'd probably forget about the bike problem, as you're accepting your Nobel Prize.

There's no heavy engine sitting over the front wheels either, so another benefit of FWD is lost.

 
Originally posted by: thirtythree
Maybe I'm missing something here, but I don't think it would work to have a chain hooked up to the front tire... since the front tire turns, the chain would either restrict turning or loosen up and fall off.

EDIT: Ah, I see LS21 realized this.
Click to expand...

The mechanical connection would have to go up to the handle then down the forks of course. Some sort of drive shaft would probably be easier to implement.
 
Originally posted by: thedarkwolf
AWD close enough?
Click to expand...
That's badass.

Not only is it AWD, but it's smart AWD - diverting power to the other wheel when one slips.

Neat.
 
Originally posted by: Amused
AWD drive off road motorcycles:

http://www.motorcycle-usa.com/...ge.aspx?ArticleID=4079
Click to expand...

>>Perhaps the best known option for real off-road motorcycling up till now has been the hydraulic Ohlins system. Developed in conjunction with Yamaha for the WR450F, the Ohlins setup has one major drawback that seems to be universally bitched about - sapping engine power. Christini claims that the total amount of loss with their AWD system is 1/10th of a horsepower. Natural speculation combined with our quick riding impression has left us to doubt it truly drags so little. However, we're certain that whatever it is, it isn't much.

I was wondering about power loss. That doesn't seem like much considering all the gears and sprockets required.
 
Originally posted by: angry hampster
Imagine hitting the front brake hard on a FWD motorcycle. :laugh: That's potentially 30-40lbs moved from the rear to the front.
Click to expand...

Same thing that happens when you slam the front brake on a normal bike?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top