Stupid moronic hackers.

djheater

Lifer
Mar 19, 2001
14,637
2
0
Can we kill these retards?

I was trying to look up info for my Dad. He's going through chemo for stage IV Esophageal Cancer and is having a rough time...

Seriously, I'm a little fvcking pissed.
 

kogase

Diamond Member
Sep 8, 2004
5,213
0
0
Have a hissy fit. Have a rant session with the wall. Slap it with a white glove. Know true peeeace.
 

Chompman

Banned
Mar 14, 2003
5,608
0
0
Originally posted by: RBachman
I loathe children :frown:

Remove that bag over your head to show us you are not michael jackson in disguise and are trying to make us think that. :D
 

Yzzim

Lifer
Feb 13, 2000
11,990
1
76
Originally posted by: alkemyst
blame gmail.

bringing spammers to the get level.

Agreed :|

Gmail can't afford their own webspace, have to go and steal from others :(
 

hevnsnt

Lifer
Mar 18, 2000
10,868
1
0
Lets get this straight.. Those people ARE NOT HACKERS.

All they did was hit a button or ran a script.. My guess is they got in using a super lame well known exploited. The cancer site should have updated
 

yankeesfan

Diamond Member
Aug 6, 2004
5,922
1
71
Originally posted by: hevnsnt
Lets get this straight.. Those people ARE NOT HACKERS.

All they did was hit a button or ran a script.. My guess is they got in using a super lame well known exploited. The cancer site should have updated

Who would hack a cancer site? I wouldn't worry about security!
 

Chompman

Banned
Mar 14, 2003
5,608
0
0
Originally posted by: alkemyst
Originally posted by: Chompman
Originally posted by: alkemyst
blame gmail.

bringing spammers to the next level.

:confused:

Why blame gmail when there are hundreds of other free e-mail sites?

more advertizing.

Why not simply report that email address to gmail and let them deal with that and see what happens? :p
 

djheater

Lifer
Mar 19, 2001
14,637
2
0
Originally posted by: hevnsnt
Lets get this straight.. Those people ARE NOT HACKERS.

All they did was hit a button or ran a script.. My guess is they got in using a super lame well known exploited. The cancer site should have updated

The implication of your post is that these are poseur hackers and 'real' hackers are much more skilled. There is an underlying subtext that 'skilled' hacking is somehow more legitimate and more morally defensible. Do you really think that's a defensible argument? These script kiddies are just as much hackers and just as criminal as any other who engages in the destruction of property for pleasure.
 

Chompman

Banned
Mar 14, 2003
5,608
0
0
Originally posted by: djheater
Originally posted by: hevnsnt
Lets get this straight.. Those people ARE NOT HACKERS.

All they did was hit a button or ran a script.. My guess is they got in using a super lame well known exploited. The cancer site should have updated

The implication of your post is that these are poseur hackers and 'real' hackers are much more skilled. There is an underlying subtext that 'skilled' hacking is somehow more legitimate and more morally defensible. Do you really think that's a defensible argument? These script kiddies are just as much hackers and just as criminal as any other who engages in the destruction of property for pleasure.

We all know the only hackers are those that "hack the gibson" . :p
 

hevnsnt

Lifer
Mar 18, 2000
10,868
1
0
Originally posted by: djheater
Originally posted by: hevnsnt
Lets get this straight.. Those people ARE NOT HACKERS.

All they did was hit a button or ran a script.. My guess is they got in using a super lame well known exploited. The cancer site should have updated

The implication of your post is that these are poseur hackers and 'real' hackers are much more skilled. There is an underlying subtext that 'skilled' hacking is somehow more legitimate and more morally defensible. Do you really think that's a defensible argument? These script kiddies are just as much hackers and just as criminal as any other who engages in the destruction of property for pleasure.

No, my implication is that this was done by criminals. Not hackers.