Stuff you didn't know and probably don't care about

Page 95 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

sdifox

No Lifer
Sep 30, 2005
100,396
17,937
126
If the sheep herders keep molesting the sheep instead of letting the sheep procreate, the ratio will just keep on dropping.
 

SteveGrabowski

Diamond Member
Oct 20, 2014
8,958
7,667
136
So the US dropped four 1.2 megaton nukes on Spain in 1966. Back then the US would fly nuclear bomb equipped B-52s 24/7 from the US to the Soviet borders and back again to the US so they could quickly strike the Soviet Union at a moment's notice, but this required re-fueling the B-52s midair multiple times per flight. So a KC-135 fuel tanker's boom tore the wing off one B-52 during refueling off the coast of Spain, causing all four bombs it was carrying to drop onto the beach.

Here's the crazy part: the way hydrogen bombs work is you have a plutonium core in the shape of a sphere but of a non-critical mass, eg a mass too small to create a runaway fission chain reaction. But you have a conventional bomb that sets off a spherically symmetric explosion around that plutonium core, which compresses the plutonium core to the point it now has a critical mass and you basically have the Fat Man bomb dropped over Nagasaki (around 15 kiloton if I remember right). That fission bomb in a confined area creates enough heat to raise the temperature inside high enough to make the hydrogen fuse into helium giving off the 1.2 megaton explosion.

For two of the four hydrogen bombs the first stage conventional bomb exploded upon impact with the ground. The only reason it didn't set off the fission bomb was because the explosion wasn't spherically symmetric due to the impact with the ground, and thus didn't compress the plutonium core enough to go critical (eg to where a runaway fission chain reaction was inevitable). So if those bombs had a little more plutonium in them we might have had two groundburst 1.2 megaton explosions in Spain, and a 1.2 megaton groundburst creates enormous fallout due to kicking up a lot of dirt into the air that catches radioactive fission products floating in the air after the explosion and drags them back down to ground level as these heavy dirt particles fall to the ground.
 
Last edited:
  • Wow
Reactions: Kaido
Jul 27, 2020
28,173
19,201
146
Cows kill more humans than sharks do every year (cows are 20x deadlier than sharks)
I can attest to that. Been near a buffalo several times. Held its horns in my hands and moved its head around, enjoying the resistance it offers and the look saying, "Go away, dumb human. Lemme ruminate!". But cow? Hell no. For some reason, cows detect me as a malicious entity. The moment they see me, they go into full offensive mode. Never been able to touch a cow unattended by its caretaker. Never want to. It's not docile like a buffalo. Dangerous, dangerous STRONG animal. And a bull is something I never want to see in real life. No thank you.

By the way, knew this guy once (he probably married my aunt but I'm not sure. Haven't seen her in years) who had a huge bump on his forehead. He was attacked by his own cow who got spooked or something and butted its head directly into his forehead. He looked like someone from an episode of Star Trek.
 

IronWing

No Lifer
Jul 20, 2001
72,905
34,025
136
Eskimo–Aleut languages use a base 20 numbering system. Translating to decimals is a pain in the ass so middle school students in Kaktovik, Alaska created written base 20 numerals to work mathematical problems in their native language. It works. They even developed a working abacus using their system.

 
  • Wow
Reactions: igor_kavinski

sdifox

No Lifer
Sep 30, 2005
100,396
17,937
126
Eskimo–Aleut languages use a base 20 numbering system. Translating to decimals is a pain in the ass so middle school students in Kaktovik, Alaska created written base 20 numerals to work mathematical problems in their native language. It works. They even developed a working abacus using their system.

So them French?
 

Kaido

Elite Member & Kitchen Overlord
Feb 14, 2004
51,670
7,286
136
So the US dropped four 1.2 megaton nukes on Spain in 1966. Back then the US would fly nuclear bomb equipped B-52s 24/7 from the US to the Soviet borders and back again to the US so they could quickly strike the Soviet Union at a moment's notice, but this required re-fueling the B-52s midair multiple times per flight. So a KC-135 fuel tanker's boom tore the wing off one B-52 during refueling off the coast of Spain, causing all four bombs it was carrying to drop onto the beach.

Here's the crazy part: the way hydrogen bombs work is you have a plutonium core in the shape of a sphere but of a non-critical mass, eg a mass too small to create a runaway fission chain reaction. But you have a conventional bomb that sets off a spherically symmetric explosion around that plutonium core, which compresses the plutonium core to the point it now has a critical mass and you basically have the Fat Man bomb dropped over Nagasaki (around 15 kiloton if I remember right). That fission bomb in a confined area creates enough heat to raise the temperature inside high enough to make the hydrogen fuse into helium giving off the 1.2 megaton explosion.

For two of the four hydrogen bombs the first stage conventional bomb exploded upon impact with the ground. The only reason it didn't set off the fission bomb was because the explosion wasn't spherically symmetric due to the impact with the ground, and thus didn't compress the plutonium core enough to go critical (eg to where a runaway fission chain reaction was inevitable). So if those bombs had a little more plutonium in them we might have had two groundburst 1.2 megaton explosions in Spain, and a 1.2 megaton groundburst creates enormous fallout due to kicking up a lot of dirt into the air that catches radioactive fission products floating in the air after the explosion and drags them back down to ground level as these heavy dirt particles fall to the ground.

hide.gif
 

Charmonium

Lifer
May 15, 2015
10,555
3,546
136
The US is producing more oil than any country ever has.


As the world grapples with the existential crisis of climate change, environmental activists want President Joe Biden to phase out the oil industry, and Republicans argue he’s already doing that. Meanwhile, the surprising reality is the United States is pumping oil at a blistering pace and is on track to produce more oil than any country has in history.
 
  • Wow
Reactions: Kaido