Study proves liberal profs discriminate

[fskimospy]

I like how people try to redefine something so they can feel better about themselves.

What gives them the right to redefine something that the government has no right to even be a part of?

Wait, what? This post is nonsensical.

They don't care how private people define marriage, they care how the government defines it. What gives them the right to alter the government's definition is the same thing that gave people the right to set up government's definition to begin with. ie: they are citizens of the country affected by the law.

You realize that you can go get married without the government interfering at all right? You don't have to go notify them and you can have a purely religious ceremony. Problem solved!

 

[EXman]

Frankly it feels pretty gross to be lumped into the same group with organizations as disgusting as Focus on the Family or the FRC.

You do know that many gay groups are also anti-Christian? lol It is the same thing. Except the pro gay groups are way more provacative. Six in one half dozen in the other. You're just blind to that. Except one group does not have to redefine words to make them feel better.

you will not understand I know...

 

[EXman]

Wait, what? This post is nonsensical.

They don't care how private people define marriage, they care how the government defines it. What gives them the right to alter the government's definition is the same thing that gave people the right to set up government's definition to begin with. ie: they are citizens of the country affected by the law.

You realize that you can go get married without the government interfering at all right? You don't have to go notify them and you can have a purely religious ceremony. Problem solved!

So what gives gays the right to redefine marriage? Sorry it is late!

 

[cybrsage]

Since the thread is morphing into a discussion about gay unions and marriages and such, does that mean we have all come to an agreement that it is true that liberal professors discriminate against conservatives?

 

[nehalem256]

You realize that you can go get married without the government interfering at all right? You don't have to go notify them and you can have a purely religious ceremony. Problem solved!

So you are saying that when gay people complain they cannot get married they are spewing BS.

And they are really complaining that the government is interfering with their private lives, but not interfering?

 

[fskimospy]

1.) I asked you when you thought Bush should pop the housing bubble. You said 2003 at the latest.

2.) If the popping the housing bubble was such an obvious thing to do why didnt Kerry make that part of his attack on Bush? Did John Kerry agree with Bush's handling?

EDIT: The reason the question is so hard to answer is because it is like asking if you want to be raped in the mouth or the butt.

Last chance before I just go back to making fun of you about your misogyny. Was Bush's policy the correct one? Yes/No?

There are tons of totally smart and useful policy positions that don't make for good campaign platforms for attack. Also, and more importantly, the actions of John Kerry do not excuse the actions of Bush. I'm not sure how you don't know that. See you complain about people not addressing you on substance, and then you act like this.

 

[fskimospy]

So you are saying that when gay people complain they cannot get married they are spewing BS.

No, what a stupid thing to say. Gay people are advocating for government marriage, not religious marriage.

 

[fskimospy]

So what gives gays the right to redefine marriage? Sorry it is late!

I already answered that. Gay people have the same right as anyone else to decide what our legal definition of marriage is. They are citizens just like anyone else.

What I want to know is why you would think certain groups of people wouldn't have the right to have input into our legal definitions. That's a monstrous idea.

 

[EXman]

lol I gotta run I know eskimo cannot see things from the other side. I understand gays or some want to have the same protections as marriages affords and i'm not really against that. But just don't redefine marriage. Oh and Yes I have gotten discriminated against from a lib prof but she made such an ass out of herself it was worth it.

 

[EXman]

I already answered that. Gay people have the same right as anyone else to decide what our legal definition of marriage is. They are citizens just like anyone else.

What I want to know is why you would think certain groups of people wouldn't have the right to have input into our legal definitions. That's a monstrous idea.

nevermind you wouldn't get that... why bother.

 

[nehalem256]

Last chance before I just go back to making fun of you about your misogyny. Was Bush's policy the correct one? Yes/No?

There are tons of totally smart and useful policy positions that don't make for good campaign platforms for attack. Also, and more importantly, the actions of John Kerry do not excuse the actions of Bush. I'm not sure how you don't know that. See you complain about people not addressing you on substance, and then you act like this.

In an ideal world it would have most likely been the best course of action to pop the housing bubble earlier

but

1.) No president is going to take action to tank the economy on purpose
2.) If he had the Democrats would have crucified him for doing so.

 

[DominionSeraph]

Thread needs ponies. Ugh.

Boring...

 

[nehalem256]

What I want to know is why you would think certain groups of people wouldn't have the right to have input into our legal definitions. That's a monstrous idea.

Funny. How that seems to be much more inline with what the left believes.

I mean just look how at how they treat CFA for having an input into the legal definition of marriage.

 

[DominionSeraph]

herp derp I'm a a stupid conservative. blah blah blah

 

[cybrsage]

herp derp I'm a a stupid conservative. blah blah blah

Troll post by a troll noted.

 

[DominionSeraph]

Troll post by a troll noted.

Just commentary on the thread. Nothing but repeating the same old destroyed arguments. You conservatives work really hard on your self-delusion, but it's boring to watch.

Shut your eyes.
Shut your ears.
Loop, loop, loop.

Take a straight path off to a pure entertainment break

 

[cybrsage]

Off topic post, not meant to add but only derail. Classic troll post. You would do well to just delete it and save yourself the problems you are causing yourself.

 

[DominionSeraph]

Thread was derailed as soon as nehalem started posting. That idiot eskimospy feeding the trolls didn't help any.

Seriously, look at this crap:

There is no devil. If I get a 15 year old girl pregnant in California I can go the jail for statutory rape, because she is not old enough to make choices about her body, but then she can turn around and make choices about her body to get an abortion.

Of course. Liberals love to say they are tolerant...when it is a lie. They claim the meaning of tolerance is being intolerant of the views of others...

The lefties are sure doing everything they can to derail a reasonable political thread.

 

[cybrsage]

So you now admit you were trolling. Good for you for being honest, bad for you for breaking forum rules.

 

[DominionSeraph]

Moving up from trolling to lying, eh?


Your own post admits that you recognized the thread was derailed:

Since the thread is morphing into a discussion about gay unions and marriages and such

but when I add a comment to the mess, you all of a sudden go back, change your mind, and try to bluster that it is all my fault. Who do you think you're fooling with that line? Yourself, to be sure, but don't you realize that not everyone is so eager to be deceived as you are?

 

[Jhhnn]

Says the guy who has repeatedly post charts that contradicted his views

see

1.) Blaming Reagan for the lack in rise in wages vs GDP. Then posting a chart that showed this started in the 1970s to prove this.

2.) Blaming Bush for the Housing Bubble. While posting a chart showing that the housing bubble was already the largest in history in 2001 when Bush took office.

Remarkable set of false attributions intended as duh-version. Standard for you, I suppose.

Both of you "points" have been debunked repeatedly, and neither one have anything to do with the topic at hand...

 

[shira]

Since the thread is morphing into a discussion about gay unions and marriages and such, does that mean we have all come to an agreement that it is true that liberal professors discriminate against conservatives?

When you write a non sequitur in response to post, are you conceding that the writer of the earlier post was correct and that you're an idiot?

 

[cybrsage]

When you write a non sequitur in response to post, are you conceding that the writer of the earlier post was correct and that you're an idiot?

No, I am not doing what you routinely do. Thanks for asking the question.

 

[shira]

Moving up from trolling to lying, eh?


Your own post admits that you recognized the thread was derailed:



but when I add a comment to the mess, you all of a sudden go back, change your mind, and try to bluster that it is all my fault. Who do you think you're fooling with that line? Yourself, to be sure, but don't you realize that not everyone is so eager to be deceived as you are?

It's already clearly been established that cybrsage is a liar. He's just back from a 3-day ban for lying, immediately after returning from a 2-week ban for trolling. Just take a look at:

http://forums.anandtech.com/showpost.php?p=33775246&postcount=179

 

[cybrsage]

Post formatting failure!

EDIT: Much better now.