Study: Media coverage has favored Obama campaign

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

daniel49

Diamond Member
Jan 8, 2005
4,814
0
71
Originally posted by: T2T III
Just when I thought it was a good time for me to head to bed for the night, this tasty piece of news appeared. I thought I'd share it for all to read and discuss. For me, though, I'm heading to sleep and will read up on the tread in the morning. Nighty night, y'all. :D

NEW YORK ? John McCain supporters who believe they haven't gotten a fair shake from the media during the Republican's candidacy against Barack Obama have a new study to point to.

Comments made by sources, voters, reporters and anchors that aired on ABC, CBS and NBC evening newscasts over the past two months reflected positively on Obama in 65 percent of cases, compared to 31 percent of cases with regards to McCain, according to the Center for Media and Public Affairs.

ABC's "World News" had more balance than NBC's "Nightly News" or the "CBS Evening News," the group said.

Meanwhile, the first half of Fox News Channel's "Special Report" with Brit Hume showed more balance than any of the network broadcasters, although it was dominated by negative evaluations of both campaigns. The center didn't evaluate programs on CNN or MSNBC.

"For whatever reason, the media are portraying Barack Obama as a better choice for president than John McCain," said Robert Lichter, a George Mason University professor and head of the center. "If you watch the evening news, you'd think you should vote for Obama."

The center analyzed 979 separate news stories shown between Aug. 23 and Oct. 24, and excluded evaluations based on the campaign horse race, including mention of how the candidates were doing in polls. For instance, when a voter was interviewed on CBS Oct. 14 saying he thought Obama brought a freshness to Washington, that was chalked up as a pro-Obama comment.

When NBC's Andrea Mitchell reported Oct. 1 that some conservatives say that Sarah Palin is not ready for prime-time, that's marked in the negative column for McCain.

ABC recorded 57 percent favorable comments toward the Democrats, and 42 percent positive for the Republicans. NBC had 56 percent positive for the Democrats, 16 percent for the Republicans. CBS had 73 percent positive (Obama), versus 31 percent (McCain).

Hume's telecast had 39 percent favorable comments for McCain and 28 percent positive for the Democratic ticket.

It was the second study in two weeks to remark upon negative coverage for the McCain-Palin ticket. The Project for Excellence in Journalism concluded last week that McCain's coverage has been overwhelmingly negative since the conventions ended, while Obama's has been more mixed.

Meanwhile, another survey issued Friday by the Pew Research Center for the People & the Press showed that television continues to be Americans' main source for campaign news, particularly the cable news networks.

But there were clear partisan differences in where people turned.

For instance, of the people who said they got most of their campaign news from Fox News Channel, 52 percent identified themselves as Republican, 17 percent as Democrats and 30 percent as independents, the Pew center said.

MSNBC viewers interested in campaign news identified themselves at 11 percent Republican, 50 percent Democratic and 36 percent independent. The breakdown for CNN: 13 percent Republican, 45 percent Democrat, 38 percent independent.

The study was based on a survey of 2,011 people taken Oct. 17-20 and 24-27. It has a margin of error of plus or minus 2.5 percent.

Source, posted one hour ago:

Comcast News

I hope it didn't cost them anything for this study. Iwould have told them for free.
MSNBC and NBC obviously the worst of the bunch and should be issued a pair of Obama pom poms.
"Meanwhile, the first half of Fox News Channel's "Special Report" with Brit Hume showed more balance than any of the network broadcasters"
ahemm

 

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
74,592
6,715
126
Originally posted by: T2T III
Originally posted by: MBrown
Originally posted by: Balt
Maybe it's because Obama has run a better and cleaner campaign with fewer mistakes.

:thumbsup:

I can only relate that to the Simpson's movie. Homer and the rest of the community kept throwing crap into their lake until one day, it was a toxic dump. As far as clean goes, the Obama campaign has been clean as far as keeping the dust hidden under the rug. Eventually, that dust is going to come right back out ... just like Homer's pig sh!t.

This is nothing but gobbledygook. As likely is that the media brought Obama an adultress to condemnand and he passed the test.
 

aphex

Moderator<br>All Things Apple
Moderator
Jul 19, 2001
38,572
2
91
Originally posted by: jbourne77
I still don't understand why people think McCain's campaign is so much more negative than Obama's. Here in Ohio we're getting hit over the head with negative Obama ads, which FAR outnumber the McCain ads. Now, you can argue that this is simply because McCain is broke, but to insinuate that McCain is "the one running the dirty campaign" is absolutely laughable.

FL is quite the opposite.
 

DAPUNISHER

Super Moderator CPU Forum Mod and Elite Member
Super Moderator
Aug 22, 2001
31,885
32,092
146
Originally posted by: aphex
Originally posted by: jbourne77
I still don't understand why people think McCain's campaign is so much more negative than Obama's. Here in Ohio we're getting hit over the head with negative Obama ads, which FAR outnumber the McCain ads. Now, you can argue that this is simply because McCain is broke, but to insinuate that McCain is "the one running the dirty campaign" is absolutely laughable.

FL is quite the opposite.
Yep, and don't even get me started on the shit stuffed in my mail box every day.

 

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,685
136
It's not their own lies, the looting and the slimeslinging that's hurting repubs- it's teh ebil Libruhl media. Ask 'em, they'll tell ya.

The depth of denial is staggering, and revealing. I suspect admissions to mental health centers will be swamped under admissions for catatonic wingnuts in the month of november...
 

Rainsford

Lifer
Apr 25, 2001
17,515
0
0
Originally posted by: cubby1223
The reason Obama has been able to run a "clean" campaign is because he has had the overwhelming majority of media outlets in his back pocket doing all the dirty work for him. It's the "media" that's negative towards McCain - not the Obama campaign... :roll:


I'd have to search for a link, and I know that no one here will believe me even if I did find it, so I won't waste my time - there was an independent study done of the news networks as a whole as to the percentage of negative vs. positive stories on each candidate. It broke down about like this:
NBC News %55 negative for McCain, 35% negative for Obama
MSNBC 75% negative for McCain, 15% negative for Obama
Fox News 40% negative for McCain, 40% negative for Obama

Maybe Obama is just a more "positive" candidate, and the media is covering him fairly? Despite the Fox News mantra, "fair" and "balanced" are two completely different things. The media is supposed to be fair and objectively report reality. If reality is balanced in favor of one candidate, that's hardly something we can blame the media for. Of course you'd sound pretty stupid claiming that "reality has a liberal bias", but let's be honest...that's basically what you're saying.
 

Harvey

Administrator<br>Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
35,057
67
91
Originally posted by: sandorski

You guys are violating McCains Civil Rights gauranteed by the Constitution!!!

Before John McCain continues the Bushwhackos' treasonous assault on OUR First Amendment rights! :shocked:

McCain Flip-Flops Again, Now Supports Bush-Style Warrantless Wiretapping

June 4, 2008 01:00 PM

Back in December 2007, before the primary season began, when it didn't yet look as if he was going to be the Republican nominee, John McCain believed that he could make all sorts of "maverick" breaks with the Bush White House and its policies. Take this highlight from an interview with the Boston Globe as an example:

CHARLIE SAVAGE, Boston Globe: Does the president have inherent powers under the Constitution to conduct surveillance for national security purposes without judicial warrants, regardless of federal statutes?

JOHN MCCAIN: There are some areas where the statutes don't apply, such as in the surveillance of overseas communications. Where they do apply, however, I think that presidents have the obligation to obey and enforce laws that are passed by Congress and signed into law by the president, no matter what the situation is.

SAVAGE: Okay, so is that a no, in other words, federal statute trumps inherent power in that case, warrantless surveillance?

MCCAIN: I don't think the president has the right to disobey any law.
And just days ago, Wired Magazine cited McCain surrogate Charlie Fish as saying that McCain "would not support immunity for the telecoms that aided the Bush administration's warrantless spying program, unless there were revealing Congressional hearings and heartfelt repentance from those telephone and internet companies."

But what a difference a few days and a Michael "I CAN HAZ DICTATORIAL POWERZ" Goldfarb makes! Via WIRED Threat Level:

If elected president, Senator John McCain would reserve the right to run his own warrantless wiretapping program against Americans, based on the theory that the president's wartime powers trump federal criminal statutes and court oversight, according to a statement released by his campaign Monday.

McCain's new tack towards the Bush administration's theory of executive power comes some 10 days after a McCain surrogate stated, incorrectly it seems, that the senator wanted hearings into telecom companies' cooperation with President Bush's warrantless wiretapping program, before he'd support giving those companies retroactive legal immunity.
McCain campaign spokesman Douglas Holtz-Eakin told The Corner yesterday:

Here is the bottom line: Senator McCain supports the FISA modernization bill passed by the Senate without qualification. He believes no additional steps should be necessary to secure immunity for the telecoms; both the 109th and 110th Congresses have conducted extensive evaluation and examination of this topic and have satisfied the public's need for appropriate oversight; hearings purportedly designed to 'get to the bottom of things' have already occurred; and neither the Administration nor the telecoms need apologize for actions that most people, except for the ACLU and the trial lawyers, understand were Constitutional and appropriate in the wake of the attacks on September 11, 2001.

Senator McCain has never stated, nor does he believe that telecoms should only receive retroactive immunity in exchange for congressional testimony about their actions. We do not know what lies ahead in our nation's fight against radical Islamic extremists, but John McCain will do everything he can to protect Americans from such threats, including asking the telecoms for appropriate assistance to collect intelligence against foreign threats to the United States as authorized by Article II of the Constitution.
So there you have it. Another day, another McCain flip-flop, another blurred line of separation between McCain and Bush.

John Mccain couldn't keep his Double Talk Express on track if it had training wheels. :confused:

McCain's McShame is that he really is more of McSame. :thumbsdown: :|
 

classy

Lifer
Oct 12, 1999
15,219
1
81
Originally posted by: Balt
Maybe it's because Obama has run a better and cleaner campaign with fewer mistakes.

Thats really it in a nutshell. Even if you disagree with Obama, there is no question Obama has run a cleaner and less polarizing campaign by a wide margin over McCain.
 

OrByte

Diamond Member
Jul 21, 2000
9,303
144
106
It is hard to say anything positive about a campaign that has engaged in divisive politics. A campaign that has been marred with gaffs (starting with the Palin decision)

A campaign that has been flaming the culture wars of America.

Obama's camp (other than engaging in negative ads) is not the major cuplrit of these happenings, McCain's camp is.

He has been behind in the polls for months, he has been desparate to smear Obama, his rally's are offensive and inflammatory, he has no POSITIVE MESSAGE.

tell me, what the hell is the media supposed to do when a candidate runs such a horrible campaign?!

Anything that is negative towards McCain can be considered favorable to Obama.
 

L00PY

Golden Member
Sep 14, 2001
1,101
0
0
News flash!

Tampa Bay Rays supporters who believe they haven't gotten a fair shake from the media during the World Series against the Philadelphia Phillies have a new study to point to.

Comments made by sources, voters, reporters and anchors that aired on ABC, CBS and NBC evening newscasts during the series reflected positively on the Phillies in 80 percent of cases, compared to 20 percent of cases with regards to the Rays, according to the Center for Media and Public Affairs.

...

"For whatever reason, the media are portraying the Phillies as a better baseball team than the Rays," said Robert Lichter, a George Mason University professor and head of the center. "If you watch the evening news, you'd think the Phillies won the World Series."

Are you surprised that there were "negative comments" made about a losing team? When you make blunders and they get reported, they'll likely be negative.
 

SigArms08

Member
Apr 16, 2008
181
0
0
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
A special characteristic of the press is that they are trained in the art of objectivity......

LMAO, you cannot possibly be serious!! Lets just remove the two major parties for a moment....where's the objectivity when it comes to providing coverage of the smaller party candidates?

And to suggest that Fox doesn't favor republicans or all the other networks and most newspapers don't favor the Dems, then you are either a tad bit misinformed or blinded by partisanship.

 

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
74,592
6,715
126
Originally posted by: SigArms08
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
A special characteristic of the press is that they are trained in the art of objectivity......

LMAO, you cannot possibly be serious!! Lets just remove the two major parties for a moment....where's the objectivity when it comes to providing coverage of the smaller party candidates?

And to suggest that Fox doesn't favor republicans or all the other networks and most newspapers don't favor the Dems, then you are either a tad bit misinformed or blinded by partisanship.

In the first place fox noise is not news media, it's pure entertainment. The overwhelming majority of real news media favors Obama because they are objective in their assessment. Objective doesn't mean balanced. Don't forget. Every jackass in the world thinks HE'S the touchstone of objective.
 

extra

Golden Member
Dec 18, 1999
1,947
7
81
Normally I might see an issue with some media "favoritism" but honestly this time it seems to be that Obama just ran a better campaign and frankly, McCain's campaign did a ton of completely retarded shit.

Saying the media should have treated them both with equal respect is kind of like saying if you have two people, one who says the sky is blue and one who says the sky is pink, the media should give the guy saying the sky is pink equal respect and coverage.
 

cyclohexane

Platinum Member
Feb 12, 2005
2,837
19
81
Originally posted by: extra
Normally I might see an issue with some media "favoritism" but honestly this time it seems to be that Obama just ran a better campaign and frankly, McCain's campaign did a ton of completely retarded shit.

Saying the media should have treated them both with equal respect is kind of like saying if you have two people, one who says the sky is blue and one who says the sky is pink, the media should give the guy saying the sky is pink equal respect and coverage.

:thumbsup:
 

tvarad

Golden Member
Jun 25, 2001
1,130
0
0
Unlike in previous elections, when the Republicans throw s**t at their opponent it's being thrown right back at them this time. That's why they're whining.
 

HomerJS

Lifer
Feb 6, 2002
38,905
32,010
136
"Meanwhile, the first half of Fox News Channel's "Special Report" with Brit Hume showed more balance than any of the network broadcasters"
ahemm

[/quote]

Is this the same Fox News that called Obama a defacto terrorist?????
 

nageov3t

Lifer
Feb 18, 2004
42,808
83
91
Originally posted by: HomerJS
"Meanwhile, the first half of Fox News Channel's "Special Report" with Brit Hume showed more balance than any of the network broadcasters"
ahemm

Is this the same Fox News that called Obama a defacto terrorist?????
[/quote]

what? :confused: when?
 
Oct 16, 1999
10,490
4
0
Isn't this sort of like whining that most media coverage of Brittney Spears or O.J. Simpson is negative? When you do negative things that are news worthy, guess what kind of coverage you're going to get.
 

Viditor

Diamond Member
Oct 25, 1999
3,290
0
0
Originally posted by: Gonad the Barbarian
Isn't this sort of like whining that most media coverage of Brittney Spears or O.J. Simpson is negative? When you do negative things that are news worthy, guess what kind of coverage you're going to get.

:thumbsup:

+1
 

HomerJS

Lifer
Feb 6, 2002
38,905
32,010
136
Originally posted by: loki8481
Originally posted by: HomerJS
"Meanwhile, the first half of Fox News Channel's "Special Report" with Brit Hume showed more balance than any of the network broadcasters"
ahemm

Is this the same Fox News that called Obama a defacto terrorist?????

what? :confused: when?[/quote]
E.D. Hill accused Obama of using "a terrorist fist jab"

 

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
74,592
6,715
126
New study: Historical coverage has favored Churchill campaign. Iranian Society for the Objectification of Historical Information says Holocaust didn't happen and Hitler is getting a raw deal.
 

PokerGuy

Lifer
Jul 2, 2005
13,650
201
101
Wait wait.... the media is biased towards the socialist? Say it ain't so! Next thing you'll be telling me the tooth fairy is not real!

 

jpeyton

Moderator in SFF, Notebooks, Pre-Built/Barebones
Moderator
Aug 23, 2003
25,375
142
116
McCain's a piece of shit and ran a shit campaign.

The media doesn't have an obligation to cheerlead a piece of shit.
 

heyheybooboo

Diamond Member
Jun 29, 2007
6,278
0
0
And another big surprise ....

The Goebbels-like propaganda being spewed on this forum by the wing-nuts ...