Student Says He Was Suspended After Refusing To 'Stomp On Jesus'

Page 12 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

UberNeuman

Lifer
Nov 4, 1999
16,937
3,087
126
Humble Christians, threatening teachers...with physical harm and death.


The Professor's exercise definitely delivered. Christians can be mouth breathing, animalistic heathens just like Muslims rioting over a comic.

It's what Jesus would have wanted..
 
Apr 27, 2012
10,086
58
86
Humble Christians, threatening teachers...with physical harm and death.


The Professor's exercise definitely delivered. Christians can be mouth breathing, animalistic heathens just like Muslims rioting over a comic.

This doesn't represent all Christians, It was one student who got upset.
 

SheHateMe

Diamond Member
Jul 21, 2012
7,251
20
81
This doesn't represent all Christians, It was one student who got upset.

lmao look at you singing a different tune. I thought he was a victim?

Now, when it is revealed that not only was he the aggressor but that 1) the lesson was not about hating Christians 2) he lied about having to "stomp" on Jesus you want to change your stance to "This doesn't represent all Christians, it was the one student who got upset". Really?

You were going on and on about anti-Christian this and that and it turns out that yet another one of your threads took a big nasty fart right in your face.



The professor's lesson was very significant (and important) and it definitely got results. Now, we know there was a whiny christian in the room that wanted to get violent as a result of something that could have sparked an interesting discussion.


/thread.
 
Last edited:
Apr 27, 2012
10,086
58
86
lmao look at you singing a different tune. I thought he was a victim?

Now, when it is revealed that not only was he the aggressor but that 1) the lesson was not about hating Christians 2) he lied about having to "stomp" on Jesus you want to change your stance to "This doesn't represent all Christians, it was the one student who got upset". Really?

You were going on and on about anti-Christian this and that and it turns out that yet another one of your threads took a big nasty fart right in your face.



The professor's lesson was very significant (and important) and it definitely got results. Now, we know there was a whiny christian in the room that wanted to get violent as a result of something that could have sparked an interesting discussion.


/thread.

There was no mention that he got angry that way. The student was wrong for doing that but the professor should never have done that lesson. If he wanted an interesting discussion why didn't the textbook put in another religion.
 

SheHateMe

Diamond Member
Jul 21, 2012
7,251
20
81
There was no mention that he got angry that way.


Yes, you were convinced that he was telling the whole truth and nothing but the truth because he was a Christian. You vehemently defended him even when we all pointed out that he was probably embellishing the truth.

Now another one of your outrage threads is blowing up in your face and you're trying to play the "oh, I didn't know all the facts" game.

the professor should never have done that lesson. If he wanted an interesting discussion why didn't the textbook put in another religion.

His lesson didn't come from a textbook, dumb dumb. It was a social experiment that was supposed to spark a discussion on symbols that society holds important. It is such an important discussion to have, and of course...and idiot just like you was in that classroom and decided to get upset.

Did you miss the part where he didn't actually expect anyone to step on the paper? That was part of the reaction he was looking for.

That's probably way over your head though. That's why we have special education for people like you.
 
Apr 27, 2012
10,086
58
86
Yes, you were convinced that he was telling the whole truth and nothing but the truth because he was a Christian. You vehemently defended him even when we all pointed out that he was probably embellishing the truth.

Now another one of your outrage threads is blowing up in your face and you're trying to play the "oh, I didn't know all the facts" game.



His lesson didn't come from a textbook, dumb dumb. It was a social experiment that was supposed to spark a discussion on symbols that society holds important. It is such an important discussion to have, and of course...and idiot just like you was in that classroom and decided to get upset.

Did you miss the part where he didn't actually expect anyone to step on the paper? That was part of the reaction he was looking for.

That's probably way over your head though. That's why we have special education for people like you.

The student lied and I didn't expect him to because there was no reason for it. Attacks against Christianity do happen in universities.

You say its a social experiment then why not do it to Muhammed, Why Jesus. He could have done it to Muhammed and he would have got a much bigger reaction. Anyone can go after Christians but not the other religions.

How would you like it if they did it to you
 

lotus503

Diamond Member
Feb 12, 2005
6,502
1
76
This doesn't represent all Christians, It was one student who got upset.

One you used as an example of Christians being attacked.

What we find out its Christian's themselves who display the disgusting behavior.

Thread fail, OP fail, Christianity fail.

Trifecta of stupid
 
Apr 27, 2012
10,086
58
86
One you used as an example of Christians being attacked.

What we find out its Christian's themselves who display the disgusting behavior.

Thread fail, OP fail, Christianity fail.

Trifecta of stupid


Because this is part of many other cases. There are many other cases of Christianity being attacked by universities and leftists. And the people who threatened the professor are not Christians but just idiots.
 
Feb 6, 2007
16,432
1
81
You say its a social experiment then why not do it to Muhammed, Why Jesus. He could have done it to Muhammed and he would have got a much bigger reaction. Anyone can go after Christians but not the other religions.

I imagine he used Jesus because the entire point of the lesson is meant to spark a discussion on how we revere symbols and there is a much greater percentage of Christians than Muslims in this country, so he's likely going to observe more reverence to Jesus than Mohammed. He could have written God on the paper, I suppose, but that really doesn't matter. The entire point of the lesson is lost on people who can't accept any discussion of symbol-worship without thinking that it must be an attack against them.
 

lotus503

Diamond Member
Feb 12, 2005
6,502
1
76
Because this is part of many other cases. There are many other cases of Christianity being attacked by universities and leftists. And the people who threatened the professor are not Christians but just idiots.

You don't get to judge who is Christian or not, the people who profess their own faith do that.

When your own OP actually displays the opposite of what you had hoped, you want to dismiss it with But... But... But.. Christians are attacked let me find other examples of it.

You want people to feel sorry for Christians being attacked, you need to first own that some Christians are in fact representative of everything you point out as wrong.

Each time you post a Christianity Victim thread the end result is you making Chrstians look bad. If you want to do Christianity a favor you would stop posting trash.
 

lotus503

Diamond Member
Feb 12, 2005
6,502
1
76
I imagine he used Jesus because the entire point of the lesson is meant to spark a discussion on how we revere symbols and there is a much greater percentage of Christians than Muslims in this country, so he's likely going to observe more reverence to Jesus than Mohammed. He could have written God on the paper, I suppose, but that really doesn't matter. The entire point of the lesson is lost on people who can't accept any discussion of symbol-worship without thinking that it must be an attack against them.

This has been pointed out and blatantly ignored by the OP several times in this thread already. he doesn't want to discuss truth just his warped version of it.
 

Theb

Diamond Member
Feb 28, 2006
3,533
9
76
I always felt bad for this professor. My sister in law used to fw:fw:FW: his exploits to me once a month or so. He would always start an argument with his class then have his life's work destroyed by some simple logic from a doe eyed undergrad fresh from Jesus Camp or a veteran. You have to admire his determination though, he's like the Wile E. Coyote of atheists.

Meanwhile I spent 4 years at a pinko commie indoctrination center and never heard a professor say anything bad about god or religion. I feel like I missed out on part of the college experience.