There was no mention that he got angry that way.
Yes, you were convinced that he was telling the whole truth and nothing but the truth because he was a Christian. You vehemently defended him even when we all pointed out that he was probably embellishing the truth.
Now another one of your outrage threads is blowing up in your face and you're trying to play the "oh, I didn't know all the facts" game.
the professor should never have done that lesson. If he wanted an interesting discussion why didn't the textbook put in another religion.
His lesson didn't come from a textbook, dumb dumb. It was a social experiment that was supposed to spark a discussion on symbols that society holds important. It is such an important discussion to have, and of course...and idiot just like you was in that classroom and decided to get upset.
Did you miss the part where he didn't actually expect anyone to step on the paper? That was part of the reaction he was looking for.
That's probably way over your head though. That's why we have special education for people like you.