It will probably cost jobs which is the last thing they want. What did they get out of it ?
I think people are missing the point . What is this doing in the health care bill ?
You can be assured that if it got more votes for health care it is in there to do a lot more than just cut out the middle man in the student loan process. Why would so many democrats care all of sudden that we are cutting out a middle man , enough so that they sign on to health care?
It will probably cost jobs which is the last thing they want. What did they get out of it ?
so that they sign on to health care?
It will cost jobs that frankly shouldn't have existed in the first place. What is the point of paying a 3rd party to hand out the government's money?
i still have no idea why they think that increasing demand will ever make college more affordable.
especially since this is just a giant handout to UoP.
Instead, you just have one massive corporation with far more overhead than any collection of private companies could ever dream about. And quit pretending that you're concerned about the taxpayers' money. If you were, you wouldn't be supporting this bill in the first place because of all of the other crap which forms its foundation.No, they aren't going to be doing same job. It's not going to be hundreds of different companies with their own overheads and other middlemen then helping you pick one of those companies and taking another cut. Plus since the taxpayers are the ones taking the risk, the people reviewing the applications better be working for the taxpayers.
Reconcilliation can not be used to pass policy.
It's rolled into the health care bill because the HC bill itself will not pass muster with the CBO on its own. It's part of a plethora of gimmicks the Dems are using to get this HC bill through.I think people are missing the point . What is this doing in the health care bill ?
You can be assured that if it got more votes for health care it is in there to do a lot more than just cut out the middle man in the student loan process. Why would so many democrats care all of sudden that we are cutting out a middle man , enough so that they sign on to health care ?
It will probably cost jobs which is the last thing they want. What did they get out of it ?
As a bit of a side issue, one of the facets of the CBO scoring that the Dems are crowing about is the $138 billion in savings over ten years.
There are many more of us that realize this than don't. But amazingly, or not, our opinions are meaningless in the United States in 2010.The way government operates, they'll just see this $138b reduction, and say to us "let's create another new entitlement for $138b, we have the money sitting here."
The bigger gimmick will be that the first 4 years of taxes will be put to use in new gov't spending, stimulus 3.0 perhaps, it will not be saved to cover the "benefits" of this bill.
Giving a government handout to these student loan outfits is wrong. This is a step in the right direct. However, a step FURTHER in the right direction would be eliminating government funded student loans all together! Let the private sector decide which students are worth lending to. You have people going to college partying it up and majoring in Women's Studies on the government dime.
I am happy to see banks taken out of the subsidized student loan equation. I however do not like payment limits or forgiveness now given to student loans after 10/20 years. We don't need more liberal arts graduates with careers are Barnes & Nobles cashiers, and we certainly don't need to subsidize it.
However, a step FURTHER in the right direction would be eliminating government funded student loans all together! Let the private sector decide which students are worth lending to. You have people going to college partying it up and majoring in Women's Studies on the government dime.
This. The costs of education, like health care, are skyrocketing largely because desperate people willing to pay any price to receive an education are gaining access to greater amounts of credit.
Exactly! Too many psychology and sociology majors who got a C in organic chemistry working at Starbucks with 100k in debt.
Well I bet I wouldn't have gotten any loans for a geography degree because I bet bankers have no idea what geography is, and in reality it probably is more risky than an engineering degree or something. But my geography degree just got me a stable job at Maui County.
Bankers might not know what geography is but they'll have data that shows which degrees lead to higher paying jobs and adjust loan offers accordingly.
But that's the problem. Most people with a geography degree don't use it, but some of us do.
I think people are missing the point . What is this doing in the health care bill ?
You can be assured that if it got more votes for health care it is in there to do a lot more than just cut out the middle man in the student loan process. Why would so many democrats care all of sudden that we are cutting out a middle man , enough so that they sign on to health care ?
It will probably cost jobs which is the last thing they want. What did they get out of it ?