What's stopping them from putting the car on neutral/stepping on brakes/turning off car? ^_^
never. it won't be long before conventional throttles are extinct, and for good reason - they are totally redundant.
Turning the engine off seems dangerous. As far as I know, the car's hydraulics (brakes, steering) are run off engine power... turn off the power, lose power braking/steering. Fail. Also maybe this isn't true in newer cars but in the cars I've driven, if you turn the steering wheel too far w/the engine off, it locks.
I do not understand why these fucking morons just don't put it in neutral.
WHAT THE FUCK ?
Please elaborate?
Drive by wire is now pretty much universal, so they can and have taken the next step.
Some mfgs have actually done away with the throttle altogether such as with BMW's valvetronic, Fiat's multi-air, Toyota's valvematic, etc.
And I'm a little confused your post. You are mentioning intake valve systems that allow them to adjust timing, how does take the place of a throttle butterfly?
EDIT: Very sleepy.
Actually it was people simply hitting the wrong pedal, but yes to put the prius in neutral you need hold it in N for a moment, it doesn't simply go right into it. Also, pressing the ignition does nothing; it needs to be held for a moment. Still, slam the damn brakes should be number Fvcking 1 priority!On the topic of sticking the car in neutral... wasn't the issue with the unintended acceleration on the prius a few years back was that it has a goofy gearbox where there's no actual mechanical linkage and instead a switch? And that there was some kind of glitch?
I didn't follow it too closely, so my memory may be a bit fuzzy there.
On the contrary, if I'm not mistaken an increasing number of cars now have--because they are drive by wire--built such that when the brake is pressed with the accelerator the throttle will cut.A lot of our responses are made with the assumption that the controls we have available are mechanically linked. More and more parts of cars are controlled by computers and not direct mechanical links anymore. First we saw it with throttles, more recently with transmissions.
Car we are imagining:
Brakes: Can still work without engine running. You have to just stomp really hard
Steering: Like brakes, can be done, just harder to turn.
Transmission: mechanically linked, just pull it out of gear.
But in a 100% computer controlled car without direct mechanical controls that has "crashed"
Brakes: Useless spring loaded petal
Steering: Useless
Transmission: Useless
Obviously this sounds incredibly doomsday, but it is an example of a worse case scenario. As such I think car designers should keep it in mind and maybe keep somethings mechanical.
I hate drive-by-wire. I exclusively drive manuals and miss the feeling of a mechanical linkage allowing me to finely tune and actuate the gas pedal in relation to the clutch; the feel of a lifeless smooth pedal doesn't translate resistance of the throttle plate well and unless you clean your throttle body every time you change your oil, chances are it will stick closed for a fraction of a second. Plus, never have I ever driven a car where the DBW system didn't have some sort of a delay in the system itself. (Disclaimer: I've never driven the newer manuals in premium sports cars like BMWs, Benzes, Infinit's, etc. I would like to give them a whirl though)
And I'm a little confused your post. You are mentioning intake valve systems that allow them to adjust timing, how does take the place of a throttle butterfly?
EDIT: Very sleepy.
Valvetronic.
Enjoy better performance while consuming less fuel: Valvetronic lets you get even more driving pleasure from your BMW engine.
This highly advanced technology replaces the conventional throttle butterfly with a electrical mechanism that controls the amount of lift of the individual intake valves on each cylinder. Your engine is able to breathe freely, delivering better performance while using less fuel.
The performance of the engine is more efficient and immediate, thanks to the elimination of the pumping losses and air-flow disturbance caused by a conventional throttle butterfly. Instead, air can flow through the intake manifold freely, and Valvetronic precisely regulates the quantity of air entering the cylinders.
Valvetronic uses a stepper motor to control a secondary eccentric shaft fitted with a series of intermediate rocker arms, which in turn control the degree of valve lift. The throttle butterfly is no longer needed as a means of controlling the air supply - though for safety reasons it is still fitted as an emergency back-up.
By optimising the fuel/air mix process, Valvetronic produces fuel savings of up to 10 percent (based on the ECE driving cycle). In addition, Valvetronic improves cold start behaviour, lowers exhaust emissions and provides smoother, more immediate power.
I had this happen on a stick shift car. Freaked me out for a second, but once I grasped what was happening, threw it into neutral, red lined, slammed on the brakes, locked up, realized I didn't have ABS, pumped brakes, and stopped. Scared some soccer moms half to death.
No they don't, I'd they are worn enough the engine could over power them, especially once it has some momentum behind it.
Please elaborate?