IGNORE THE FACT THAT THEY WERE RACING FOR ONE MOMENT.
Now, what is your reaction to someone doing 55mph in a 37mph. Atleast in Illinois, that is far from reckless driving charges. Reckless driving starts at 31mph over the limit. So what would you say if someone did cut them off and cause an accident? Again, ignore the racing aspect and take those facts as the basis of your judgement.
Now factor in that they were racing and that it was a woman killed. How does this change the situation? I do not think it should change the situation at all. Why should it? And take into account that because they were previously were racing, that affected the media's take on the story, and I'm sure it had a decent impact on the initial article in the original post. How much of your initial reaction is swayed by the writer's perspective? Can you really know?
EDIT - what I'm trying to get at is, what is the difference between a "racer" and someone who is speeding?
Now, what is your reaction to someone doing 55mph in a 37mph. Atleast in Illinois, that is far from reckless driving charges. Reckless driving starts at 31mph over the limit. So what would you say if someone did cut them off and cause an accident? Again, ignore the racing aspect and take those facts as the basis of your judgement.
Now factor in that they were racing and that it was a woman killed. How does this change the situation? I do not think it should change the situation at all. Why should it? And take into account that because they were previously were racing, that affected the media's take on the story, and I'm sure it had a decent impact on the initial article in the original post. How much of your initial reaction is swayed by the writer's perspective? Can you really know?
EDIT - what I'm trying to get at is, what is the difference between a "racer" and someone who is speeding?