• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Straight savings vs. 401k or other investment plan

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
If you're putting money in a savings account, and intend to hold it long term, you don't deserve to have that money. It should be in a better area, namely the stock market.

For us, our cash flow and expenses are such that the "emergency fund" is secondary to my goals of putting money in a 401k (until we know with certainty that we won't be returnign to canada, the tax implications of a Roth IRA are not good), so once 10% of income is contributed to the 401k, NEXT is making sure there are a few thousand in a savings account (any more than that and it's just losing too much money in potential returns). Once that's taken care of, next up is whatever spare money can be thrown into an unsheltered account (index fund, specifically).

Near the top of that priority list is education/savings fund for skoorbaby, which is also an unsheltered fund (again, tax implications of possible return to canada make 529 and ESA unattractive).

I always think the so-called "emergency fund" is overblown. You cannot plan for everything, so realistic emergencies are a major car repair, or job loss. A car repair can be covered, if you want it to be, on a credit card. The sort of person who has good investments, and could otherwise have his 3-6 months in savings, should be able to pay that off in a month or two anyway. Next up on the list is job loss. This is partly countered by unemployment insurance, and secondly by massive spending restrictions at time of loss. Of course savings will come into account, but most people can massively slash their budgets if they lose their job. And if you blow them, hell you can start tapping gently into your non-retirement accounts.

Diversification for me means a couple of index funds. Let them diversify. Costs related to mutual funds ensure that 80%+ of mutual funds do not even match the market, so why bother even trying to find a good one? Pick a couple of index funds and be done with it.
Must 401k and Roth IRA investments be taken directly out of your pay? Or can you add money to either of them whenever you'd like?
Roth you set the terms (make payments yourself, or have it withdrawn on a monthly basis from your checking). 401k is taken out by your employer each pay check.
I believe vanguard.com has some good info, as does fool.com, though fool will eventually try to convince you to start picking stocks instead of mutual funds.
Nail=hit. Vanguard's information is incredibly useful. So is fool, but as mentioned, in time they start thinking you need to pick stocks, which is entirely untrue. Picking individual stocks is gambling. Unless you are good (most people, no matter what they think are not), this is what you do with your play money, not the bulk of your money.
Since I don't really make enough money to force myself to save a set amount, I just spend what I spend and save the excess. Because I am a diligent person and only buy I what I really need or want, this works out decently well. As I said, I have about $3800 in an ING account, but that doesn't really feel like enough money to me to start tossing a grand or two into investments.
Heck yeah one or two grand is enough! Vanguard, for most of its funds, requires a minimum of $3k for an unsheltered account, but they have one that requires only a grand.
So do most of you save 3-8 months worth of salary in a regular savings account, and then once you have enough there invest all of what you can?
That's one approach, but I would personally guess that 10% of the adult population actually has 3+ months after-tax money sitting in a savings account. Of course, most adults don't even know how to spell investment, so that isn't surprising.
 
Aren't ROTH IRAs sort of a gambling game? By that I mean you are paying taxes on the money at your current tax rate. When I'm old and retired, my income is going to be significantly less and if it's like it is today, my tax bracket will be much lower. Seems like ROTH wouldn't be a good choice unless a flat tax rate was impossed or taxes in general skyrocket.
 
SKOORB:
Thank you for all the information. I will try to address what I can in order, I appreciate the assistance.

I see that your priority order is 401k, then ROTH, then a few thousand in savings, and finally unsheltered accounts. Unsheltered = taxable? Can you go into any more detail with what you do with index funds?

You mentioned that you feel keeping tens of thousands of dollars in a savings acount is pointless. Can you give an approximate figure of how much you think is a good idea? How about the unavoidable things, like mortgage, utilities, and car payments? If you were unemployed for as long as three months would your amount in savings be enough to cover it? (Not trying to contest you, just wondering what a good amount really is.)

I am glad you mentioned NOT gambling with individual stocks for the most part, because of course I, not knowing much about investing, just think about buying and selling stocks when I think about the stock market. Of course that seems like a high gamble and not something I'd want to play with much, so I'm glad to hear that's not really a primary method.

On those same lines, can you provide any more detail about what index funds are and which ones you choose?

Finally, after you max out your IRA and 401k, what type of investing do you do on your own? Is this another area where purchasing index funds through something like Vanguard could come into play?

Also, I wasn't saying that one or two grand isn't enough to invest, I was saying I feel that that's not enough to remove a significant chunk of it yet. I'd like more padding in my savings before investing some, I think.
 
Originally posted by: royaldank
Aren't ROTH IRAs sort of a gambling game? By that I mean you are paying taxes on the money at your current tax rate. When I'm old and retired, my income is going to be significantly less and if it's like it is today, my tax bracket will be much lower. Seems like ROTH wouldn't be a good choice unless a flat tax rate was impossed or taxes in general skyrocket.

You're paying taxes on what you put in which is $3000/year (I think $4000/yr starting this year), but when that $3000 grows to $20,000, you only pay the taxes on $3000 which is a huge savings.
 
unless you are a professional investor or just very lucky you will make the most by buying vanguard index funds. don't try to invest individually untill you really know what you are doing, (as most professionally managed mutual funds return less than index funds after fees) You can put up to 4000/ year out of wages into a roth ira for which capital gains are tax free in the future. buy a total market/s&p 500/ Russel 2000 etc. fund .
 
I see that your priority order is 401k, then ROTH, then a few thousand in savings, and finally unsheltered accounts. Unsheltered = taxable? Can you go into any more detail with what you do with index funds?
Index funds are among the best mutual funds because:
1. They are "passive" funds that don't pay someone to pick stocks, they must buy exactly what stocks are on the index. This keeps the annual management fee for the fund very low.

2. They are low risk. An S&P 500 fund like Vanguard VFINX buys stock in all 500 companies on the Standard and Poors 500 index list, so you are betting that 500 stocks will do well overall instead of just 1 or 2 stocks.

Unsheltered is taxable, so that's why you fund the 410k and Roth first. Still, better to earn 10% on VFINX and pay up to 1/3 of that to the IRS than to leave the money in a savings account or CD to earn 0-4% (and pay 1/3 of that to the IRS).
 
Originally posted by: archcommus
But should I focus on building my personal savings to more than ten grand or so first?
That's not a bad idea, but maybe a bit less. As Skoorb points out, if you ever have a real emergency you can always cash out part or all of your brokerage account as well as your savings account.
 
My employer doesn't offer 401K, so I max out the roth IRA, hight and low risk mutual fund in equal amount, then put the money that's suppose to go into 401K into savings, plus CD. I have $2 in the checking acct.
 
Thanks for the info, Dave.

So I will focus on building the savings first and foremost. How much do you think? I already have about $4,000. After I reach my set goal in there should I then start investing ALL surplus money I have? Then, once I get a real job later in my life, invest as much as possible in a ROTH and 401k, and then invest even more in a Vanguard account? Or, do I not really have to worry about investing beyond my ROTH and 401k?
 
Check out what Fidelity, Vanguard, and TRowePrice have to offer. Each company's mutual fund's different. Find one that suits you.
 
Originally posted by: archcommus
Thanks for the info, Dave.

So I will focus on building the savings first and foremost. How much do you think? I already have about $4,000. After I reach my set goal in there should I then start investing ALL surplus money I have? Then, once I get a real job later in my life, invest as much as possible in a ROTH and 401k, and then invest even more in a Vanguard account? Or, do I not really have to worry about investing beyond my ROTH and 401k?
You can (and usually should) set up the Roth IRA at vanguard or another good borkerage house. Vanguard is a good choice because you can buy their own funds like VFINX without paying any purchase fee. Other good places like Fidelity often give you that deal on their own "house brand" funds.

INGDirect is one good place to park your money while you're saving up, their savings account pays as much as a 1-year CD at many other places.

Even after you have $4K you might want to just keep putting the money into INGDirect (or similar) for a while, because most brokerage houses will charge you an "account maintenance fee" unless you keep at least $5,000 worth of cash or mutual funds in your account.

So you might want to save up until you reach $8-9,000, then send $5,000 of that off to vanguard (or fidelity, ameritrade, scottrade).

It's nice to have savings / investments outside of retirement funds, in case of emergencies, for saving up for a house, and so that you don't have any money-releated fears about losing a job. A boss can't keep you under his thumb if you know you can always leave without worrying about paying the rent.
 
Originally posted by: DaveSimmons
Originally posted by: archcommus
Thanks for the info, Dave.

So I will focus on building the savings first and foremost. How much do you think? I already have about $4,000. After I reach my set goal in there should I then start investing ALL surplus money I have? Then, once I get a real job later in my life, invest as much as possible in a ROTH and 401k, and then invest even more in a Vanguard account? Or, do I not really have to worry about investing beyond my ROTH and 401k?
You can (and usually should) set up the Roth IRA at vanguard or another good borkerage house. Vanguard is a good choice because you can buy their own funds like VFINX without paying any purchase fee. Other good places like Fidelity often give you that deal on their own "house brand" funds.

INGDirect is one good place to park your money while you're saving up, their savings account pays as much as a 1-year CD at many other places.

Even after you have $4K you might want to just keep putting the money into INGDirect (or similar) for a while, because most brokerage houses will charge you an "account maintenance fee" unless you keep at least $5,000 worth of cash or mutual funds in your account.

So you might want to save up until you reach $8-9,000, then send $5,000 of that off to vanguard (or fidelity, ameritrade, scottrade).

It's nice to have savings / investments outside of retirement funds, in case of emergencies, for saving up for a house, and so that you don't have any money-releated fears about losing a job. A boss can't keep you under his thumb if you know you can always leave without worrying about paying the rent.

Couldn't agree more. Nothing worse than feeling like you haven't any choice...

 
Originally posted by: Descartes
What would you guys recommend if you're not eligible for a Roth?

If you make too much money and is not eligible for IRA, invest in mutual funds.
 
Originally posted by: Descartes
What would you guys recommend if you're not eligible for a Roth?
Straight brokerage account at Vanguard with at least $5K to start, buy VFINX (S&P 500).

Low risk for a stock-based fund, very good historical return (based on decades of history) and low capital gains relative to other mutual funds since the index doesn't change much (so no stock sales).
 
Originally posted by: Skoorb
If you're putting money in a savings account, and intend to hold it long term, you don't deserve to have that money. It should be in a better area, namely the stock market.

For us, our cash flow and expenses are such that the "emergency fund" is secondary to my goals of putting money in a 401k (until we know with certainty that we won't be returnign to canada, the tax implications of a Roth IRA are not good), so once 10% of income is contributed to the 401k, NEXT is making sure there are a few thousand in a savings account (any more than that and it's just losing too much money in potential returns). Once that's taken care of, next up is whatever spare money can be thrown into an unsheltered account (index fund, specifically).

Near the top of that priority list is education/savings fund for skoorbaby, which is also an unsheltered fund (again, tax implications of possible return to canada make 529 and ESA unattractive).

I always think the so-called "emergency fund" is overblown. You cannot plan for everything, so realistic emergencies are a major car repair, or job loss. A car repair can be covered, if you want it to be, on a credit card. The sort of person who has good investments, and could otherwise have his 3-6 months in savings, should be able to pay that off in a month or two anyway. Next up on the list is job loss. This is partly countered by unemployment insurance, and secondly by massive spending restrictions at time of loss. Of course savings will come into account, but most people can massively slash their budgets if they lose their job. And if you blow them, hell you can start tapping gently into your non-retirement accounts.

Diversification for me means a couple of index funds. Let them diversify. Costs related to mutual funds ensure that 80%+ of mutual funds do not even match the market, so why bother even trying to find a good one? Pick a couple of index funds and be done with it.
Must 401k and Roth IRA investments be taken directly out of your pay? Or can you add money to either of them whenever you'd like?
Roth you set the terms (make payments yourself, or have it withdrawn on a monthly basis from your checking). 401k is taken out by your employer each pay check.
I believe vanguard.com has some good info, as does fool.com, though fool will eventually try to convince you to start picking stocks instead of mutual funds.
Nail=hit. Vanguard's information is incredibly useful. So is fool, but as mentioned, in time they start thinking you need to pick stocks, which is entirely untrue. Picking individual stocks is gambling. Unless you are good (most people, no matter what they think are not), this is what you do with your play money, not the bulk of your money.
Since I don't really make enough money to force myself to save a set amount, I just spend what I spend and save the excess. Because I am a diligent person and only buy I what I really need or want, this works out decently well. As I said, I have about $3800 in an ING account, but that doesn't really feel like enough money to me to start tossing a grand or two into investments.
Heck yeah one or two grand is enough! Vanguard, for most of its funds, requires a minimum of $3k for an unsheltered account, but they have one that requires only a grand.
So do most of you save 3-8 months worth of salary in a regular savings account, and then once you have enough there invest all of what you can?
That's one approach, but I would personally guess that 10% of the adult population actually has 3+ months after-tax money sitting in a savings account. Of course, most adults don't even know how to spell investment, so that isn't surprising.

scoorb,

while your insight is correct having liquid funds not applicable to taxes for 6 months living expenses is the norm and just good common sense.

You're young haven't yet experienced financial hardship. Keep this in mind with a baby to feed.

What I'm trying to say is consider the tax implications. The nest egg is the nest egg. Savings is for a comletely different reason. Sure I could tap my investments/401K/roth if need be - BUT I DON'T WANT TO DUE TO TAXES, hence savings.
 
Originally posted by: DaveSimmons
Originally posted by: archcommus
Thanks for the info, Dave.

So I will focus on building the savings first and foremost. How much do you think? I already have about $4,000. After I reach my set goal in there should I then start investing ALL surplus money I have? Then, once I get a real job later in my life, invest as much as possible in a ROTH and 401k, and then invest even more in a Vanguard account? Or, do I not really have to worry about investing beyond my ROTH and 401k?
You can (and usually should) set up the Roth IRA at vanguard or another good borkerage house. Vanguard is a good choice because you can buy their own funds like VFINX without paying any purchase fee. Other good places like Fidelity often give you that deal on their own "house brand" funds.

INGDirect is one good place to park your money while you're saving up, their savings account pays as much as a 1-year CD at many other places.

Even after you have $4K you might want to just keep putting the money into INGDirect (or similar) for a while, because most brokerage houses will charge you an "account maintenance fee" unless you keep at least $5,000 worth of cash or mutual funds in your account.

So you might want to save up until you reach $8-9,000, then send $5,000 of that off to vanguard (or fidelity, ameritrade, scottrade).

It's nice to have savings / investments outside of retirement funds, in case of emergencies, for saving up for a house, and so that you don't have any money-releated fears about losing a job. A boss can't keep you under his thumb if you know you can always leave without worrying about paying the rent.
This is exaclty why I felt I should have more than $5,000 in my ING account. I think once I'm older and have car payments, house payments, etc., that five grand wouldn't really make me feel secure enough, that's why I was thinking I'd want 10+ grand in my ING account.

So whatever that amount is, achieve that FIRST (agree?), and then start investing. I can get the ROTH on my own independent of an employer (right?), and I should maximize that if at all possible before maximizing a 401k. Then, if I can afford to invest more after maximizing the ROTH, start automatic reductions into my 401k.

Am I on the right track here?

EDIT: Just ready spidey's post, and that's sort of what I was thinking, as well. Would need at least 3-6 months' salary in ING to feel completely secure.
 
Originally posted by: spidey07
Originally posted by: Skoorb
If you're putting money in a savings account, and intend to hold it long term, you don't deserve to have that money. It should be in a better area, namely the stock market.
...
The sort of person who has good investments, and could otherwise have his 3-6 months in savings, should be able to pay that off in a month or two anyway. Next up on the list is job loss. ... you can start tapping gently into your non-retirement accounts.

...That's one approach, but I would personally guess that 10% of the adult population actually has 3+ months after-tax money sitting in a savings account. Of course, most adults don't even know how to spell investment, so that isn't surprising.
scoorb,
while your insight is correct having liquid funds not applicable to taxes for 6 months living expenses is the norm and just good common sense.

You're young haven't yet experienced financial hardship. Keep this in mind with a baby to feed.
He makes a good point though, have 6+ months of savings but with most of it in non-retirement investments, for example index mutual funds, instead of a savings account.

If you have say 2 months in savings and 8 months in a brokerage account, you can always sell some fund shares after the first month. S&P 500 does dip down now and then so you might sell at a small loss, but over the years the S&P500 fund shares will grow 2-3 times as fast as if you keep the money in a savings account instead.
 
one does not pay capital gains tax on savings.

But then again I'm not a CPA, I just listen to them when they say 3-6 months in liquid/non-taxable savings is a good idea.

 
Originally posted by: DaveSimmons
Originally posted by: spidey07
Originally posted by: Skoorb
If you're putting money in a savings account, and intend to hold it long term, you don't deserve to have that money. It should be in a better area, namely the stock market.
...
The sort of person who has good investments, and could otherwise have his 3-6 months in savings, should be able to pay that off in a month or two anyway. Next up on the list is job loss. ... you can start tapping gently into your non-retirement accounts.

...That's one approach, but I would personally guess that 10% of the adult population actually has 3+ months after-tax money sitting in a savings account. Of course, most adults don't even know how to spell investment, so that isn't surprising.
scoorb,
while your insight is correct having liquid funds not applicable to taxes for 6 months living expenses is the norm and just good common sense.

You're young haven't yet experienced financial hardship. Keep this in mind with a baby to feed.
He makes a good point though, have 6+ months of savings but with most of it in non-retirement investments, for example index mutual funds, instead of a savings account.

If you have say 2 months in savings and 8 months in a brokerage account, you can always sell some fund shares after the first month. S&P 500 does dip down now and then so you might sell at a small loss, but over the years the S&P500 fund shares will grow 2-3 times as fast as if you keep the money in a savings account instead.

How do taxes work with a regular brokerage account?

Lets say I open a brokerage account with 10k all in VFINX with dividends re-invested.

The current price of a VFINX is $111.58 for 1 share. With 10k invested I will have about 89.62 shares. Lets say 1 year from now it goes up to $113.25 with dividends re-invested lets say 90.05 shares

$113.25*90.05=10198.1625... Now I have to sell off some shares because I need the money for medical bills. How will my brokerage account be taxed? What will I be paying taxes on...?

Also another question a little off topic.

For example, I have a 401k, roth ira ( with money invested in vanguard stock index funds like the vfinx) plus a brokerage account with vfinx. Since I have invested in VFINX in my roth ira and brokerage account wouldnt that stunt diversification?

Edit
VFINZ=VFINX 🙂
 
Originally posted by: spidey07
one does not pay capital gains tax on savings.

But then again I'm not a CPA, I just listen to them when they say 3-6 months in liquid/non-taxable savings is a good idea.
You pay as much or more on savings interest income -- you pay straight income taxes. Right now at least some of your capital gains will only be taxed at 15%, the rest will be taxed at the same rate as savings accounts.
 
Back
Top