• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Stopping Necro Threads

Status
Not open for further replies.

guyver01

Lifer
How about the database mark threads older than a certain date as "archived"

IE: threads before June (since we're August) are marked as archived... they cannot be bumped or posted, and the user gets a message stating "this thread has been archived, please post a new thread"

i believe that VB has a function like this.. so why not switch to VB already?



Necro the necro thread

🙄


esquared
Anandtech Forum Director
 
Last edited by a moderator:
IIRC FuseTalk used to do this. I remember, quite a while back, trying to bump an old thread of mine with a new question, but being unable to do so since it was archived; that is, obviously, no longer the case and I have no idea why or when this changed.

I have to say I don't really mind necro threads though.

KT
 
Originally posted by: KeithTalent
I have to say I don't really mind necro threads though.

That's because OT has the best ones. 😀 The AC mouse, alternator sized beef, etc...
 
Originally posted by: SagaLore
Originally posted by: KeithTalent
I have to say I don't really mind necro threads though.

That's because OT has the best ones. 😀 The AC mouse, alternator sized beef, etc...

Well those are usually bumped every few months.

I think op means when a thread hasn't been bumped for over 2 or 3 years and someone revives it.
 
is it ironic to necro a thread about stopping thread necro?

maybe something over a year or 5 old?


vader_irony.jpg



esquared
Anandtech Forum Director
 
Last edited by a moderator:
who cares if it's a necro unless the point was to turn it into a neff at which point it's violating a seperate and established rule anyway.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top