That guy's an idiot. And I don't mean just in the standard way that conservatives are idiots in regards to basic conclusions; it's that on top of that he's confused as to the basis for the argument nor can he calculate the ramifications of changing it.
"Same-sex attraction," distances from the, "Homosexuals are eeeebil" foundation of the base.
"Engaging in same-sex intercourse," is really distant, so it loses the heat. It uses a participle to modify the noun form of a modified general verb used as a euphemism for verb. "They are engaging in, 'to course between.'" You want to keep it as close to, "They fuck each other," as possible to keep up the emotional reaction to the imagery.
"Sodomy," only preaches to the choir because nobody but a religious retard uses the word. And the natural translation into "sodomite" gives the gays an identity that defines the definer -- and not in a good way. "Ultraconservative religious extremist nut-job." This would leave moderates to reject the ultraconservative in favor of the gay. (Lemon Law may hate the Jews, but get the ghost of Goebbels in here and he'd probably find that he has more in common with them than him, changing his perspective. If you are pushing for anti-Semitism without solid propaganda network, someone like Goebbels would just hurt your cause. [Fox News' control over the lazy-minded isn't in the same league as the media control the Nazi party wielded.])
That guy needs to blow someone
Agreed. His positioning implies that he has
severely intellectualized this -- gone way beyond the usual farcical pseudo-intellectual BS used as a fig-leaf by conservatives as a cover for their slavery to emotional reaction.
He seems to be deep in the closet over something. (Or perhaps he is just an approval-seeker and has learned that telling conservatives what they want to hear is the easiest way to reach that goal. [With the added bonus that you can make a living at it.])