• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Stop gun violence - amazing psa

Page 5 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
interesting. i have several guns. not a single one has been used to kill another person. 99.9% of the time they are used to put holes in paper.

That other .1% is for hunting deer.

Are my guns defective?

I said it's made for killing people, and they've gotten incredibly good at it over the years.

You can hunt for sport if you want, but from a safety perspective, a gun is unequivocally more dangerous than a knife or a swimming pool or a chokehold.
 
Education legitimizes guns? So... history education 'legitimizes' wars, sex ed 'legitimizes' molestation and rape.......

For a liberal, that's the most ignorant anti-knowledge standpoint I've seen in a long long time.
You are a silly person. History exists whether you teach it or not, study it or life's a mystery. Sex is essential or the race will disappear in short order. We do not need guns in our houses, we will do just fine without them.
 
You are a silly person. History exists whether you teach it or not, study it or life's a mystery. Sex is essential or the race will disappear in short order. We do not need guns in our houses, we will do just fine without them.

Unfortunately for you, you do not get to determine the "need" of anyone exercising their rights.

"Shall not be infringed." Don't you just love how that sounds?
 
We do not need guns in our houses, we will do just fine without them.

And that's the great thing about America. Most people go through their lives without ever encountering voluntary manslaughter. We have that luxury. If you want to live in a war-torn country where you have to watch your back at all times and need to have a gun to survive, move to Syria.
 
1 in 3 homes has a gun in it. Wild guess: more homes have guns than have sewing machines. Yet sewing is commonly taught in home economics. When's the last time the Battle of Hastings was relevant in your life? Never? What percent of people use algebra? How many people have their own pottery wheel? What sense does it make to teach them pottery in an art class?

But, 1 in 3 homes has a gun. Mandatory gun safety would likely reduce the number of accidental fire arms deaths. Making hunter safety courses mandatory resulted in a decrease in accidental deaths while hunting. It didn't eliminate them, but the rate is much lower. Apparently, MUSE, you *want* accidental shootings in homes, because such statistics help further your agenda. That's pretty sick.

Just think how many lives would have been saved over the years if kids were aware that when the magazine was removed, there was often still a round in the chamber. What if they learned "never aim a gun at anything you don't intend to destroy. Always treat every gun as if it's loaded." I have two boys - they both learned to shoot at a very young age. A couple weeks ago, we went deer hunting together. In 20 years of them handling guns - in the house while cleaning, moving them around, getting them ready for hunting; and in the woods - NOT ONCE has the barrel of one of those guns been pointing at me, regardless of the gun even being disassembled for cleaning.
As a gun owner who's taught his kids their use you have a point of view, very much your own POV. Mine is different. I don't want gun safety taught in school because it legitimizes gun ownership by implication and I feel/believe that gun ownership that allows their storage and potential use at home should be unlawful. If that is accomplished, teaching gun safety will not be an issue. Gun ownership for hunting can be regulated. The guns involved could be checked out and license to hunt could require gun safety course completion.

In any case, isn't the question of teaching gun safety in school, that whole subject, a hijacking of this thread? The OP was about the PSA, and that was about the fact that kids don't feel safe when they know that guns are in the house.
 
Last edited:
Speak for yourself, mofo.
Gun ownership is legitimate. No need to get butthurt about it.

851910916098797601.gif
 
Very charitable of you, and have a nice holiday yourself.

You know, I never said I have no need for a gun. I do, I live in an urban environment that is at times threatening. Someone could break into my house and threaten me, kill me.... However, I elect not to own a gun. Why would I do that, a presumably rational being? I see and hear every day what's going on in the USA, that's why. I deplore the gun violence. The solution is not guns, it's less guns.

I have no need for "hate speech" but is the solution to toss out the First Amendment? Guess what, life is sometimes threatening and so are other people using their rights. It's your fucking problem to deal with your personal fears, not others to give up their rights to help you feel better about being a terrified pussy.
 
Because that's the best, most effective way of getting guns off the streets. You won't get the guns off the streets until you get them out of the home.

That makes several bad assumptions.


Most guns on "the streets" are illegal weapons from other countries.

Punishing responsible gun owners for what irresponsible gun owners do still doesn't stop irresponsible gun owners because a) They don't follow the rules and b) Gun control laws aren't meant for them in the first place.
 
As far as I'm concerned the 2nd Amendment is an impediment to progress. One way or another gun control has to move forward in the US of A. Your attempted sarcasm is absurd.

Get out.

If you don't like our Constitution then you are free to leave and go to another country that fits your ideals better. Go "progress" somewhere else where your ideas are more welcome.
 
In any case, isn't the question of teaching gun safety in school, that whole subject, a hijacking of this thread? The OP was about the PSA, and that was about the fact that *uneducated* kids don't feel safe when they know that guns are in the house.

Fixed that for you.

There is no hijacking as a gun education course would stop children from being uneducated and thinking that they are unsafe with a gun in the home. As a kid, any time I was to be exposed to something potentially dangerous in my life I had to undergo education about the dangers of what it was as well as the do's and don'ts. For example before I was able to get into a pool I had to attend swimming class to not only teach me how to swim, but how to be safe around a pool. When I was ready to drive I had to undergo the same education. When I wanted to learn how to make things in shop class I had to go through education on various power tools. When I was forced into home economics, I had to go through knife safety training. When in chem class I had to be taught about the dangers of various chemicals I would be exposed to. Even today, if I am doing work that requires me to be around or potentially exposed to hazardous materials I have to go through specific OSHA training as well as learning things like MSDS and PPE training.

Guns are EVERYWHERE whether you see them or not. I don't care that you own a gun or not, but I can promise you that at least one gun is at some point within shooting distance of you everyday in this modern world at least once a day if not more. To not have a proper education about guns is nonsense.
 
I have no need for "hate speech" but is the solution to toss out the First Amendment? Guess what, life is sometimes threatening and so are other people using their rights. It's your fucking problem to deal with your personal fears, not others to give up their rights to help you feel better about being a terrified pussy.
I'm not terrified, where did I say I was? I'm taking a political stance because I deplore America's horrible problem with gun violence. Get over yourself.
 
That makes several bad assumptions.


Most guns on "the streets" are illegal weapons from other countries.

Punishing responsible gun owners for what irresponsible gun owners do still doesn't stop irresponsible gun owners because a) They don't follow the rules and b) Gun control laws aren't meant for them in the first place.
This is the typical short sighted analysis of gun control advocacy. If you make guns illegal to own, it's completely true that the guns going forward will all be in the hands of criminals. However, over time that problem will diminish. Patience is necessary, it will take a generation or two, or three even, but eventually the problem of gun violence in the USA will largely dry up.
 
Get out.

If you don't like our Constitution then you are free to leave and go to another country that fits your ideals better. Go "progress" somewhere else where your ideas are more welcome.
I prefer to stay and try to make the country better. Who's being intolerant here? 😕 Agree with me or leave? Come now...
 
I prefer to stay and try to make the country better. Who's being intolerant here? 😕 Agree with me or leave? Come now...

You cannot be tolerant of the rights of other Americans? Eroding the constitution is the opposite of making the country better.

If it makes you feel better, we all really don't own any guns for you to worry about. We all lost them in tragic boating accidents, so you can breathe easy.
 
This is the typical short sighted analysis of gun control advocacy. If you make guns illegal to own, it's completely true that the guns going forward will all be in the hands of criminals. However, over time that problem will diminish. Patience is necessary, it will take a generation or two, or three even, but eventually the problem of gun violence in the USA will largely dry up.

Wow you are delusional as hell. Do you think the world was a calm quiet peaceful world before the invention of guns?

Your belief that there is a huge gun violence problem in America is also delusional. The vast majority of gun deaths in this country are from 2 sources. Suicides and inner city criminal on criminal violence. Those two account for the vast majority of gun deaths by every statistic ever taken here. Here's a hint, banning gun ownership would do diddly squat to either of those factors. People willing to commit suicide will find another means other than guns as they do in many other countries. Suicide rates aren't even related to gun ownership or the availability of guns at all. Suicides are a product of culture and some cultures are far worse for suicide rates than others like Japan. There is a country with pretty much a ban on gun ownership but much higher suicide rates than the US.

As far as criminals and gun violence, again, the availability of legal gun ownership has little to do with that. Take Mexico. Another country that has pretty much a ban on legal gun ownership. Yet many places are huge shit holes controlled by huge criminal gangs that all have guns. Guns used in violence in those areas are through the roof.

To put it bluntly, you are delusional and have no idea what the hell you are talking about on this subject at all. You are a product of your own uneducated ignorance that you wish enforced on others. Then you wish to think you are making "intelligent" decisions based upon your own ignorance on this subject. This is why people are telling you to GTFO.
 
I don't accept your presumed legitimacy of gun ownership. "Nothing is true or false except that thinking makes it so."
Whether or not you accept it has no bearing on the legitimacy. No amount of crying, thinking of the children, or whining about it on the internet will make a difference. You've lost, but you just haven't realized it yet.

And that's ok. Go ahead, continue with the "good fight" if it makes you feel better. You can pat yourself on the back for trying to make a difference.
 
I prefer to stay and try to make the country better. Who's being intolerant here? 😕 Agree with me or leave? Come now...

Trampling on other people's rights because you don't like them is not "making the country better."

No one says you have to own a gun. You're free not to, that is totally up to you. So likewise you shouldn't tell others they cannot own one either. Simple concept. It isn't like we're talking about a moral issue here.
 
Trampling on other people's rights because you don't like them is not "making the country better."

No one says you have to own a gun. You're free not to, that is totally up to you. So likewise you shouldn't tell others they cannot own one either. Simple concept. It isn't like we're talking about a moral issue here.
These people are the new authoritarians. But don't worry, they know what's best for you.
 
You are a silly person. History exists whether you teach it or not, study it or life's a mystery. Sex is essential or the race will disappear in short order. We do not need guns in our houses, we will do just fine without them.

You disagree with an educational school course on firearm safety because you think that will promote gun ownership, and I'm the silly one? You tried to dance around my questions. Does sex ed promote gun ownership? Does history class promote war?

It's education. Not propaganda. Only someone with an agenda would think differently.

Please note that I'm not actually FOR a gun safety or use class in public schools. But I'd be fine if they had one, because there's nothing inherently negative about it. Even if you do think otherwise.
 
As far as I'm concerned the 2nd Amendment is an impediment to progress. One way or another gun control has to move forward in the US of A. Your attempted sarcasm is absurd.

how? why?

impediment to criminal progress?
impediment to complete government takeover and police state?
impediment to pussification and zombification of america?
 
Back
Top