MomentsofSanity
Lifer
- Jan 25, 2011
- 16,590
- 8,672
- 146
You guys realize this thread is a year old, right?
Yes but the quiet rollback of some of its provisions just occurred.
You guys realize this thread is a year old, right?
Go away troll...
You bring back a year old thread and somehow try to blame the democrats and Obama.
You guys realize this thread is a year old, right?
Go away troll...
You bring back a year old thread and somehow try to blame the democrats and Obama.
Does the Act, as passed, do anything concerning the spouses of politicians?
Or was Cantor successful in creating a loophole?
You stupid fucks do realize that The Obama just signed the bill which undoes the transparency that he promised?
If you'd all take your partisan blinders off, maybe you'd realize that it's not a Slim Jim you're sucking on...
No different from the elephant in yours. Democrats and Republicans both should be ashamed.
You stupid fucks do realize that The Obama just signed the bill which undoes the transparency that he promised?
If you'd all take your partisan blinders off, maybe you'd realize that it's not a Slim Jim you're sucking on...
You stupid fucks do realize that The Obama just signed the bill which undoes the transparency that he promised?
If you'd all take your partisan blinders off, maybe you'd realize that it's not a Slim Jim you're sucking on...
Maybe I'm missing something here (admittedly I'm not very familiar with the Act), but I don't see why it is necessarily or desirable for congressional staffers to submit their personal financial info into a searchable public database.
So...
While Democrats are posturing on the gun control debate, what is congress really up to?
https://www.techdirt.com/articles/2...k-insider-trading-rules-itself.shtml#comments
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2013-...ers-key-insider-trading-reporting-requirement
There's more of that transparent government that Obama promised.
You don't see a conflict of interest when legislators who have the power to choose economic winners and losers are able to hide their financial ties to those corporations?
My understanding was the stricken provision was for federal officials and congressional staffers to disclose. That seems excessive.