• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

STOCK Act Signed

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Paul98 said:
Go away troll...

You bring back a year old thread and somehow try to blame the democrats and Obama.
Click to expand...

Would it make you feel that much better if he had more accurately stated "Democrats, Obama, AND Republicans"? If so, there ya go bud just for you.
 
BoberFett said:
You stupid fucks do realize that The Obama just signed the bill which undoes the transparency that he promised?

If you'd all take your partisan blinders off, maybe you'd realize that it's not a Slim Jim you're sucking on...
Click to expand...

No different from the elephant in yours. Democrats and Republicans both should be ashamed.
 
BoberFett said:
You stupid fucks do realize that The Obama just signed the bill which undoes the transparency that he promised?

If you'd all take your partisan blinders off, maybe you'd realize that it's not a Slim Jim you're sucking on...
Click to expand...

I was addressing my comments more to the people who were quoting year-old posts as if they had been posted today. I figured you knew what you were doing, as you were the person who bumped the thread in the first place (without the courtesy of announcing why you were bumping an old thread just to tip people off). But don't let that interrupt your profanity-laced tirade and insults.
 
BoberFett said:
You stupid fucks do realize that The Obama just signed the bill which undoes the transparency that he promised?

If you'd all take your partisan blinders off, maybe you'd realize that it's not a Slim Jim you're sucking on...
Click to expand...

Well the election is over so he doesn't have to try to look good any more. Now it can be about making money. :\
 
I just wanted to note that the only place I have seen this new update being talked about was on the daily show.

Pretty fucking sad.
 
Maybe I'm missing something here (admittedly I'm not very familiar with the Act), but I don't see why it is necessarily or desirable for congressional staffers to submit their personal financial info into a searchable public database.
 
Farang said:
Maybe I'm missing something here (admittedly I'm not very familiar with the Act), but I don't see why it is necessarily or desirable for congressional staffers to submit their personal financial info into a searchable public database.
Click to expand...

You don't see a conflict of interest when legislators who have the power to choose economic winners and losers are able to hide their financial ties to those corporations?
 
BoberFett said:
You don't see a conflict of interest when legislators who have the power to choose economic winners and losers are able to hide their financial ties to those corporations?
Click to expand...

My understanding was the stricken provision was for federal officials and congressional staffers to disclose. That seems excessive.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top