• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Stewart Parnell - just get those peanuts packaged!!!!!!!!!!!

Nocturnal

Lifer
Is anyone even remotely distrubed as I am? That an owner of a company would allow his product to go out tainted with salmonella?

I'm upset, very upset. On top of that, I think this guy should be charged with murder in the cases where people have died.

I haven't really heard too much news about this but this is pretty big if you ask me!
 
If it can be proven that peanuts shipped after he was aware of the tests killed people from salmonella, this is, IMO, a fairly clear case of second-degree murder, and criminal charges against the company and Parnell are warranted.
 
Those law enforcement officers down south are too busy confiscating bongs to be bothered with checking out sanitary conditions at a peanut plant.
 
LOL he's so fvcked. But then what kind of tongue-ass-cleaner would ship them after taking that order anyway? They should go in the same pit as him.
 
"Depraved indifference" ring a bell??? If doctoring a product with a lethal poison can be called first degree murder then knowledge of a lethal poison in a product and selling it should be the same.
 
Originally posted by: Skoorb
LOL he's so fvcked. But then what kind of tongue-ass-cleaner would ship them after taking that order anyway? They should go in the same pit as him.

"Right to work state" think about it.
 
Gee, I wonder if this incident is a part of the aftermath of Bush's policies promoting deregulating the guts right out of our regulatory agencies and the general mood and culture the Bush Admin set for having businesses regulating themselves into becoming criminals while the Fed's under Bush's watch winked at them and turned a blind eye at their "sincere" efforts to regulate themselves higher and higher profits at the expense of our health and the - *WARNING - (Neocons, read further at your own risk)* - ENVIRONMENT that we live in.
 
Originally posted by: WHAMPOM
"Depraved indifference" ring a bell??? If doctoring a product with a lethal poison can be called first degree murder then knowledge of a lethal poison in a product and selling it should be the same.
It should be if the consumer has a very reasonable expectation that the lethal poison isn't in that product. I see where you're going with this and it's not related to cigarettes 🙂

 
Originally posted by: fleshconsumed
Proof unbound capitalism doesn't work. Personal gain trumps concern for other people.

:roll:

This is a criminal act, and has no bearing on any system of economics.

Or are you going to claim capitalism causes rape too?
 
Originally posted by: BoberFett
Originally posted by: fleshconsumed
Proof unbound capitalism doesn't work. Personal gain trumps concern for other people.

:roll:

This is a criminal act, and has no bearing on any system of economics.

Or are you going to claim capitalism causes rape too?

It's only a criminal act because of the laws in place.
 
Originally posted by: fleshconsumed
Originally posted by: BoberFett
Originally posted by: fleshconsumed
Proof unbound capitalism doesn't work. Personal gain trumps concern for other people.

:roll:

This is a criminal act, and has no bearing on any system of economics.

Or are you going to claim capitalism causes rape too?

It's only a criminal act because of the laws in place.

No fucking way.
 
Originally posted by: WHAMPOM
"Depraved indifference" ring a bell??? If doctoring a product with a lethal poison can be called first degree murder then knowledge of a lethal poison in a product and selling it should be the same.

Damn strait if true he better be up on first degree murder charges. I hope it is a death penalty state. This is the kind of offense that warrants the death penalty.
 
Originally posted by: BoberFett
Originally posted by: fleshconsumed
Proof unbound capitalism doesn't work. Personal gain trumps concern for other people.

:roll:

This is a criminal act, and has no bearing on any system of economics.

Or are you going to claim capitalism causes rape too?

So, you don't understand any connection between political economics, including the ideological demand for a lack of regulation, and the reckless behaviors that result.
 
Originally posted by: fleshconsumed
Proof unbound capitalism doesn't work. Personal gain trumps concern for other people.

Well wtf kind of system would prevent this guy from doing this? 😕

 
Originally posted by: Craig234
Originally posted by: BoberFett
Originally posted by: fleshconsumed
Proof unbound capitalism doesn't work. Personal gain trumps concern for other people.

:roll:

This is a criminal act, and has no bearing on any system of economics.

Or are you going to claim capitalism causes rape too?

So, you don't understand any connection between political economics, including the ideological demand for a lack of regulation, and the reckless behaviors that result.

So you don't understand that big government is as corruptible as big business, and that any large system is bound to have some bad apples?

Keep blaming capitalism fool. I'm sure the USSR *never* had anything like this happen. :roll:
 
He pled the FiF

Peanut exec Stewart Parnell takes fifth before Congress
By Associated Press | Wednesday, February 11, 2009 | http://www.bostonherald.com | South

WASHINGTON ? The owner of a U.S. peanut company refused to testify to Congress today amid the disclosure that he urged his workers to ship bacteria-tainted products, pleading with employees to at least "turn the raw peanuts on the floor into money."

Stewart Parnell, owner of Peanut Corp. of America, repeatedly invoked his right not to incriminate himself before the House subcommittee holding a hearing on a salmonella outbreak in the U.S. blamed on his company. The outbreak has sickened some 600 people, may be linked to nine deaths ? the latest in Ohio ? and has led to one of the largest product recalls, with more than 1,800 pulled.

Parnell sat stiffly, his hands folded in his lap at the witness table, as Rep. Greg Walden, a Republican, held up a clear jar of his company?s products wrapped in crime scene tape and asked him if he would be willing to eat the food.

"Mr. Chairman and members of the committee, on advice of my counsel, I respectively decline to answer your questions based on the protections afforded me under the U.S. Constitution," Parnell said.

After repeating the statement several times, he was dismissed from the hearing.

The House panel released e-mails obtained by its investigators showing Parnell ordered products identified with salmonella shipped and quoting his complaints that tests discovering the contaminated food were "costing us huge $$$$$$."

At one point, Parnell said his workers "desperately at least need to turn the raw peanuts on our floor into money." In another exchange, he told his plant manager to "turn them loose" after products once deemed contaminated were cleared in a second test.

Parnell?s response to a final lab test showing salmonella was about how much it would cost, and the impact lab testing was having on moving his products.

"We need to discuss this," he wrote in an Oct. 6 e-mail to Sammy Lightsey, his plant manager. "The time lapse, beside the cost is costing us huge $$$$$$ and causing obviously a huge lapse in time from the time we pick up peanuts until the time we can invoice."

Lightsey also invoked his right not to testify when he appeared alongside Parnell before the subcommittee.


The disclosures came in correspondence released by a House Energy and Commerce subcommittee Wednesday during a hearing on the salmonella outbreak that has sickened 600 people, may be linked to eight deaths and has led to one of the largest recalls in history with more than 1,800 products pulled.

"Their behavior is criminal, in my opinion. I want to see jail time," said Jeffrey Almer, whose 72-year-old mother died Dec. 21 of salmonella poisoning after eating Peanut Corp.?s peanut butter. Almer and other relatives of victims urged lawmakers to approve mandatory product recalls and improve public notice about contaminated food.

A federal criminal investigation is under way.

He's going to the big house now, me thinks. Negligent homicide?
 
Originally posted by: dbk
He's going to the big house now, me thinks. Negligent homicide?
Sounds about right. If there are emails and he's sunk, pleading the fifth just makes him look like a big douche-rag.

 
About a century ago a fellow named Sinclair Lewis wrote a book called the jungle about the meat packing industry, which at the time had similar problems. Which inspired legislation to require inspections of our food.

Its not a matter of capitalism not working, its a matter than the past eight years has seen a dismantling of government regulations across all industries. And we get Enrons, Bernie Madiff, a financial meltdown of the
banking industry, and a Parnell confidently shipping contaminated peanuts.

All avoidable with some common sense regulations that wiser politicians put in place years ago. And today's dumber politicians allowed to lapse.
 
Back
Top