Stephen Kings The Gunslinger

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Barfo

Lifer
Jan 4, 2005
27,539
212
106
Originally posted by: lxskllr
Stephen King books should never be made into movies. I haven't seen one yet that wasn't a butchered, watered down experience.

Try no reading the book before watching the movie.
 

nageov3t

Lifer
Feb 18, 2004
42,808
83
91
Originally posted by: DefDC
Originally posted by: MBony
Originally posted by: Maleficus
I've heard so many good things about this book/series, i tried to read it a couple years back, couldn't finish book 1, was bored out of my mind.

Just suck it up and finish it. Books 2-3 will are 10x better, but you need that first book under your belt. Book 1 is rather dry.

QFT.


So far,

Book 1: Slow...
Book 2: Fastastic. One of the best books I've ever read. GREAT characters and suspense.
Book 3: Just as good as two.
Book 4: Yawn. Actually, pretty bad...
Book 5: Not bad
Book 6: Just started
Book 7: (Profit?)

I used to reread book 2 and 3 fairly frequently. Great stuff.

I used to think books two and three would make good movies. But I'd be heartbroken if they were crap...

Am I the only one that thought "The Stand" was done fairly well, for a TV movie anyways? :confused:

I always wished "It" would be done as a year long mini-series on HBO with full blood, gore and sex...

I have no problems telling people to watch "It" and THEN read the book. At least you'll get the characters right away, and hardly get any of the plot of the book... :)

pro tip: there's a point in book 7 where you're given a warning about continuing on.

don't ignore it. summon the willpower to put the book down and not continue on.
 

phoenix79

Golden Member
Jan 17, 2000
1,598
0
0
I always wished "It" would be done as a year long mini-series on HBO with full blood, gore and sex...

I have no problems telling people to watch "It" and THEN read the book. At least you'll get the characters right away, and hardly get any of the plot of the book... :)

They have just announced a remake of IT. but it's going to be a feature length movie so it's prolly going to be horribly butchered...
 
Feb 16, 2005
14,080
5,453
136
The Gunslinger/Dark Tower Series was one of the best series of books I've ever read, and it needs to be more of a Band of Brothers type of thing. A movie could not do 7 novels on 1 story justice.
 

Deeko

Lifer
Jun 16, 2000
30,213
12
81
Originally posted by: DefDC
Originally posted by: MBony
Originally posted by: Maleficus
I've heard so many good things about this book/series, i tried to read it a couple years back, couldn't finish book 1, was bored out of my mind.

Just suck it up and finish it. Books 2-3 will are 10x better, but you need that first book under your belt. Book 1 is rather dry.

QFT.


So far,

Book 1: Slow...
Book 2: Fastastic. One of the best books I've ever read. GREAT characters and suspense.
Book 3: Just as good as two.
Book 4: Yawn. Actually, pretty bad...
Book 5: Not bad
Book 6: Just started
Book 7: (Profit?)

I used to reread book 2 and 3 fairly frequently. Great stuff.

I used to think books two and three would make good movies. But I'd be heartbroken if they were crap...

Am I the only one that thought "The Stand" was done fairly well, for a TV movie anyways? :confused:

I always wished "It" would be done as a year long mini-series on HBO with full blood, gore and sex...

I have no problems telling people to watch "It" and THEN read the book. At least you'll get the characters right away, and hardly get any of the plot of the book... :)

Really? You thought 1 was slow and 2 was fantastic? I thought 2 was very boring - but necessary for the story.
 

Deeko

Lifer
Jun 16, 2000
30,213
12
81
Originally posted by: loki8481
TBH, I really hated Wizard and Glass too... might just be a personal issue, I hate extended flashbacks like that on the general principle that stories are boring when you already know the ending.

I liked Wizard and Glass because it explained so much of the back story. The world of the dark tower is so expansive with such an in-depth history, Wizard and Glass covered a lot of it. I was a little frustrated that the story advanced so little, but all in all I enjoyed the book.
 

lokiju

Lifer
May 29, 2003
18,526
5
0
Originally posted by: DefDC
Originally posted by: MBony
Originally posted by: Maleficus
I've heard so many good things about this book/series, i tried to read it a couple years back, couldn't finish book 1, was bored out of my mind.

Just suck it up and finish it. Books 2-3 will are 10x better, but you need that first book under your belt. Book 1 is rather dry.

QFT.


So far,

Book 1: Slow...
Book 2: Fastastic. One of the best books I've ever read. GREAT characters and suspense.
Book 3: Just as good as two.
Book 4: Yawn. Actually, pretty bad...
Book 5: Not bad
Book 6: Just started
Book 7: (Profit?)

I used to reread book 2 and 3 fairly frequently. Great stuff.

I used to think books two and three would make good movies. But I'd be heartbroken if they were crap...

Am I the only one that thought "The Stand" was done fairly well, for a TV movie anyways? :confused:

I always wished "It" would be done as a year long mini-series on HBO with full blood, gore and sex...

I have no problems telling people to watch "It" and THEN read the book. At least you'll get the characters right away, and hardly get any of the plot of the book... :)

Maybe that's why I gave up on it after giving it a try with the first one.

Maybe I'll give the second one a try.
 

zinfamous

No Lifer
Jul 12, 2006
111,887
31,404
146
Originally posted by: lxskllr
Stephen King books should never be made into movies. I haven't seen one yet that wasn't a butchered, watered down experience.

Well, as long as King isn't involved, they tend to be pretty good.

Was The Shining a bad movie? The way I see it, if the adaptation pisses off King, then it's generally a good film. film /= book. Too many fans think that the adaptation fails if every little element doesn't make it to the film. A lot of times, though, they fail to see that many of those elements are included in the subtext, or in amalgamated characters.

direct adaptations of novels would lead to 5-10 hour movies...
 

marvdmartian

Diamond Member
Apr 12, 2002
5,444
27
91
Originally posted by: phoenix79
The Dark Tower series is so long it would either be a series of about 10-12 movies or butchered so badly as to be unrecognizable.

Ding-ding-ding-ding-ding!! We have a winner!! :thumbsup:

You thought the LOTR films were long? To do any sort of good job, each book would have to be it's own movie, at a minimum!
 

gypsyman

Senior member
Jan 14, 2001
674
9
81
Ok I finished book 4 "The Wastelands" I am half way thru book 5 "The Wolves of the Calla". Yes it is very detailed. Yes it is very long. I still say it can be brought to the screen. Look how many movies Star Wars was with the prequels. If not the big screen, how about Showtime or HBO. The Sopranos ran about eight seasons. Yes I realize the Sopranos had no predetermined end and Dark Tower does. There is just too much quality material here to not make some kind of attempt at a visual production. I think the Billy Bumbler is a great character. Would love to have one, Oy.
 

ChanHo78

Senior member
Apr 9, 2009
643
0
0
King really screwed the pooch on the last book... made me want to cry it was so bad. I loved the rest of the series though.
 

cKGunslinger

Lifer
Nov 29, 1999
16,408
57
91
No - no decent movie could really be made from these books. Too many fans with too high expectations - they will do nothing but disappoint.

OTOH, I think that a talented staff could pull off a mature, "artsy" anime-esque movie loosely based on the series.
 

Farang

Lifer
Jul 7, 2003
10,913
3
0
Originally posted by: lxskllr
Stephen King books should never be made into movies. I haven't seen one yet that wasn't a butchered, watered down experience.

I really enjoyed the Skyscraper bit in The Cat's Meow
 

cKGunslinger

Lifer
Nov 29, 1999
16,408
57
91
Originally posted by: loki8481
TBH, I really hated Wizard and Glass too... might just be a personal issue, I hate extended flashbacks like that on the general principle that stories are boring when you already know the ending.

I was unsure of Book 4 the first time through - but after reading the complete series 6-7 times or so now, I think WaG may be the best story, and certainly the best-written. The Wastelands is a close second, just because of the settings and situations - lots of action.

Wolves was such a disappointmnet. King basically said, "Hey, remember that cool story of a few young 'slingers taking out the bad guys that I *just* wrote about in Book 4? Well, let's tell the same basic story again, but with the current cast of characters! Weeee! $$$"

I've also grown to sort of like the final ending. It was kind of fitting. Ka truly is a wheel. The events that led up tot he ending (Books 5-7) were pretty weak, however. Mordred was a wasted character, and getting rid of Flagg in such a silly way seemed a waste. He's the Walkin' Dude, FFS!
 

cKGunslinger

Lifer
Nov 29, 1999
16,408
57
91
Originally posted by: lxskllr
Stephen King books should never be made into movies. I haven't seen one yet that wasn't a butchered, watered down experience.

His short stores tend to make better films, especially with big actors. Shawshank and Stand By Me, for example.
 

Gunslinger08

Lifer
Nov 18, 2001
13,234
2
81
Originally posted by: SlitheryDee
Originally posted by: lokiju
As long as they can do it justice like they did with the mini-series The Stand then I'd be all for it!!!!!!!!!!!!

/sarcasm


Talk about taking a awesome book and making a terrible movie out of it...


One book that would make a good movie would be "Cell"

Agree. That was a cool take on the zombie horror story.

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0775440/
 

QueBert

Lifer
Jan 6, 2002
22,999
1,193
126
I've always wanted to see a movie from The Talisman made. Still one of my favorite books of all time.
 

cKGunslinger

Lifer
Nov 29, 1999
16,408
57
91
Originally posted by: joshsquall
Originally posted by: SlitheryDee
Originally posted by: lokiju
As long as they can do it justice like they did with the mini-series The Stand then I'd be all for it!!!!!!!!!!!!

/sarcasm


Talk about taking a awesome book and making a terrible movie out of it...


One book that would make a good movie would be "Cell"

Agree. That was a cool take on the zombie horror story.

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0775440/

The book was pretty bad (not Dreamcatcher bad, but still.) I hope they take some artistic licenses with the movie - it can only help, really.
 

CKent

Diamond Member
Aug 17, 2005
9,020
0
0
Originally posted by: loki8481
the ending of the series (last 2-3 books) were so godawful bad they retroactively ruined the entire series for me.

Same. 1-4 were amazing, after that it was sharply downhill. Having read some of his other new work, I don't think he's lost his touch -- but he's gone in a direction which doesn't go well with his DT series.

As for his other film adaptations, horror writing naturally relies on the reader's imagination, something film deprives us of. It isn't surprising his other stuff has been (mostly) badly adapted, especially considering the deficiencies of TV actors (It, The Stand). The Shining was directed by Kubrick, and despite even Kubrick's (same initials - SK) greatness, it didn't hold a candle to the book, and King agreed. Shawshank, ask I recall, was written specifically for the big screen, and the Green Mile was the exception.
 

chorb

Golden Member
Oct 7, 2005
1,272
0
0
I'm actually in the middle of Wovles of Calla right now; The prior 4 books were page turners, but this one is just boring the crap out of me.
 

phoenix79

Golden Member
Jan 17, 2000
1,598
0
0
I have been reading Stephen King novels since I was 14 in 1994. Started with the Gunslinger and have read almost everything he has written. It seems to me that anything written, not published, after his accident has been utter garbage about himself and his life. Read Lisey's Story, Duma Key, the last 3 DT books. I just don't like how his writing has become an ego boost for him and nothing else now.
 

Synomenon

Lifer
Dec 25, 2004
10,547
6
81
Originally posted by: CountZero
I would suggest that you read up through Wizard and Glass and stop there and just imagine whatever you want for the ending.

The last three books feel like they were picked up by a different writer who decided to take the whole thing in a totally different direction.


Good thing I stopped there. Was thinking of picking up the last three books, but I don't want to spoil the series for myself if they are really bad.
 

caivoma

Senior member
Sep 3, 2004
957
0
0
Originally posted by: Turin39789
I was pissed when he wrote himself in, but still love the series

That was one wtf moment when I read that book. Kinda loosing interest after that ...
 

Agentbolt

Diamond Member
Jul 9, 2004
3,340
1
0
There's so many problems with this:

#1. Books 5-7 are complete and utter shit. Not a single redeeming feature about them. Remember early on, when Roland was kind of a knight, but also kind of soulless bad ass killing machine? It's like King forgot who he was writing about. And it's really clear it wasn't a purposeful change, King just changed his mind and decided he didn't like the bad-ass robot Roland. Check out his re-write of the first book if you need proof.

#2. You'd need 1 movie per book, at minimum. You'd need to actually not cut out all the gore and violence and sex. It'd have to be weirdly paced and challenging to watch.

#3. People aren't going to accept a movie with so many unanswered questions. There's no less than 6 really interesting parts of the Gunslinger mythology that King didn't bother to answer. Once he got hurt (and more importantly, got sober) he lost his connection to that world and never got it back. He still wrote the books, to collect a check, but anyone who read Book 7 and didn't realize the poor guy had no idea what he was doing anymore, they weren't really paying attention.