BTW OP what do you mean by reparations? Stealth reparations for what in your opinion?
I didn't write the article, you'd have to take that question up with the author. Without a subscription to the NYT, I can't read the article this one was based of off. But having said that, I think it was a poor choice of words intended to sensationalize the authors article. Here at P&N, if you choose a title for a post that is not closely related to what you link to or, if you don't use words for a title that are in what you link to, you will bear the brunt of "the man". So, I saw this as a potentially inflammatory topic and was careful to use words for the title that were in the article.
To summarize, those are not my words and my thoughts related to your questions are of no importance because the article was about yet another huge fuck up by Obama and his bunch of malcontent misfits for which there will more than likely be no repercussions. The media as a whole certainly isn't going to talk about it.
If the thread is to continue I would prefer it be about whether there are legal implications centered around the way this program was administered that could have an effect on the Obama administration. I feel they may have broken the law and I think elected officials should have to answer to someone for their misdeeds regardless of the color of their skin or their party affiliation.