- Sep 26, 2000
- 28,559
- 4
- 0
Last edited:
Hee Haw! Hee Haw! The left is flailing around at anything that moves. I seriously hope we don't get somebody going nuts and blowing shit up on November 3rd.. the hatred flowing from the left is only serving to encourage the fringe elements of the left to act violently.. The left really needs to tone down their rhetoric before they end up getting some people killed.
I agree, this Democratic talk of "Second Amendment Solutions" to a loss at the polls is extreme beyond belief.Hee Haw! Hee Haw! The left is flailing around at anything that moves. I seriously hope we don't get somebody going nuts and blowing shit up on November 3rd.. the hatred flowing from the left is only serving to encourage the fringe elements of the left to act violently.. The left really needs to tone down their rhetoric before they end up getting some people killed.
Even as a democrat, I have to wonder about these charges.
If the Republicans and the Chamber of commerce is taking foreign money and stealing our democracy, the onus of proof is now on the democrats who have offered up no proof.
Now if the democrats can offer up any proof, it becomes a more slam dunk case, failing that its just more bullshit in an American political landscape awash in bullshit.
Does bullshit start to taste better after we develop a taste for it? Sort of like the cork after taste in fine wine?
" Mud Mud Glorious Mud, nothing quite like it for cooling the blood"
Proof is pretty hard to come by, if it is happening.
Another issue is simply how much a problem it is that it COULD be happening, how there's such a danger in the system that has no way to catch it if it does.
If tomorrow we just said 'here are a bunch of rules for politicians on spending to prevent wrongdoing, but we're going to not require any information except them to deny it'...
Considering that proof is pretty hard to come by, shouldn't we be examining the party with whom the ChiComs agree on most everything, who coincidentally is the party with a previous history of widespread and direct foreign campaign funding (Clinton) and whose big supporter and number one visitor to the Obama White House is the head of the Service Employees INTERNATIONAL Union?
I know the Dems have to run as quickly as possible from their record and their President, but surely even over their shoulder they can do a better slur than this for such a target-rich environment as the GOP. Accusing the GOP of being in bed with the ChiComs merely reminds the public of how much the Dems are in line with the ChiComs.
You still think China is Communist? And actually wants to entertain relations with labor organizations?
I hope you're actually just some sort of paid comedy relief poster... otherwise...![]()
Yes. I, and pretty much the rest of the world, still think China is Communist. (In fact, there's at least one Noble Peace Prize winner who would agree.) I realize it may no longer have the Communist purity some of you prefer, but hey, you've still got Cuba and North Korea.
Considering that proof is pretty hard to come by, shouldn't we be examining the party with whom the ChiComs agree on most everything, who coincidentally is the party with a previous history of widespread and direct foreign campaign funding (Clinton) and whose big supporter and number one visitor to the Obama White House is the head of the Service Employees INTERNATIONAL Union?
I know the Dems have to run as quickly as possible from their record and their President, but surely even over their shoulder they can do a better slur than this for such a target-rich environment as the GOP. Accusing the GOP of being in bed with the ChiComs merely reminds the public of how much the Dems are in line with the ChiComs.
You obviously don't know how to differentiate fiscally ideological disctinctions of a society from the social... China is socially Authoritatrian, but that says nothing about its current fiscal philosophy which is a strange mix of gov't industry (such as the CNOOC) and private (such as General Motors.
Getting a bit old, this shtick is. :hmm:
You obviously don't know how to differentiate fiscally ideological disctinctions of a society from the social... China is socially Authoritatrian, but that says nothing about its current fiscal philosophy which is a strange mix of gov't industry (such as the CNOOC) and private (such as General Motors).
Modern day China is economically highly privatized. If labor unions held any sway there, then 90% of everything you buy nowadays wouldn't have been made there.
I really should bill you $50 for this response, if there were a way. You're tragically ignorant. But I suspect willingly as well. You're a waste of time.
Republican appointees on USSC overturned disclosure requirements, so GOP only has itself to blame when people ask questions where the money supporting them comes from.
Communism is an economic system, but also a political system. In China's case, the political system far predates the economic system and is surviving it nicely. It is amazing though that people who are able to see that privatization and capitalism have lifted Communist China from the mud are hellbent on driving away privatization and capitalism in our own country, substituting "government knows best" central planning. There's a cogent point in economic studies: "None of us are as smart as all of us." China is learning that lesson; we are trying to unlearn it, to our great detriment.
As far as billing me $50, thank you but no. I do not patronize whores - and for $50 I'd expect more mental stimulation than you could provide.![]()
