No its childish to do that for almost any food except maybe a salad that has big leaves in it or maybe some kind of noodles that are mixed and extremely long.
This.
You cut a piece, you eat it. Then you cut another piece. This goes for any food, not just steak.
Only kids cut it all up at once, or have it done for them.
Plus, with a steak you don't want the juices to run out of it and the meat start to dry out, which would happen more quickly if you cut it up.
So is it just "one of those things" that inexplicably persists throughout the years? What part of it makes it childish? I still haven't seen a reasonable explanation for that.
And...the meat would start to dry out? What? Maybe in Arizona if you take an hour to eat lunch.
Effect on flavor: Maybe, if the temperature changes rapidly.
Meat doesn't taste like a whole lot of anything to me though. It's ok, but something has to go with it for it to be worthwhile:
I cut mine up all at once and use Heinz57. dont like it, to bad.
It's your food, do whatever the fuck you want to it.
Some people care too much what the others think of them.
A thread about the socially-acceptable sequence of cutting and eating a piece of cooked meat is now over 110 posts long in under 2 days.
For my next trick, I shall go buy some alternator-sized bulk beef and post a video of it being cut into tiny pieces after it was cooked well-done in something other than a cast iron skillet, while it cools to room temperature, and is slowly doused in store-brand ketchup.
I think it's one that has been lost in American culture, but I do believe that, at least in the UK, it is still considered proper to only eat with your dominant hand, you just use two hands to cut.
This is just so delightful though, isn't it? "No, you're using the
wrong hand for that!"
Someone with certain obsessive thoughts can be labeled has having a disorder,
or you can attend formal training to learn some obsessive behaviors that society at large is ok with, and even demands in some cases. ("You didn't eat that slice of cake with the
wrong kind of fork, did you?!! Unacceptable!")
Heck, here are the Chinese rules for chopsticks.
- It's ok to push rice right into your mouth from the bowl. (But
not in Korea.)
- Don't set down chopsticks such that they point at other people at the table.
- Don't spear food with a chopstick; only use them to grasp or move it.
This is not a sign of a compulsive mental disorder. This is a sign of proper manners. Because.
We're such a weird species.
Which is the tied to the only reason I've often cut everything up at once: I just want to use the knife, and then get it out of the way, not bothering with these multiple pieces of silverware in both hands... and especially not juggling the silverware if I intend to appear proper.
Exactly. Practical efficiency. Or laziness. They're often the same thing. :awe:
I think I remember reading somewhere in this thread that one proper way is to keep swapping the fork from one hand to the other from cut to bite. Who would come up with that as a proper way of doing it? Genuine obsessive compulsive disorder that found its way into popular culture?
But at home I certainly don't care, and don't notice food getting cold unless I get into long discussions while eating.
I'll have to keep this in mind for whenever I get myself to a nice steakhouse again. I don't like appearing to be the typical ill-mannered American.
At the same time, I usually don't care if something I do is considered to make me look more like an animal. Because, wait for it... we are!
Sometimes people get far too hung up on inventing or following these proper etiquette procedures just to feel superior to the animal kingdom. I don't think we need any of that to feel superior - the very fact that we are even dining at tables with silverware should be plenty enough for that, or, you know, the fact that we can converse with one another some profound subjects. Such as, like, this one.
If that's even the true reason behind it.
Lions gather around a kill and eat together, tearing off meat a bite at a time. We gather around a table and do the same thing.
You're supposed to enjoy your meal, not engage in a contest of efficiency. Why not put it in a blender if you want efficiency?
I guess, though most days I'd be fine if I didn't have to eat to survive.
It's a true first world problem, isn't it though: Wanting to eliminate the requirement for food, not so that I don't have to face death of starvation, but so that I wouldn't have to spend so much time throughout my life simply satisfying an extremely ancient metabolic requirement that that has yet to be properly fixed.