• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

State of the Union 1/30/18

Page 18 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
soulcougher73 said:
I think it's safe to say Trump has already won that award... Oh wait.. Seriously, not serious
Click to expand...

nah, Trump still needs the blood of millions on his hand like Dubya has. Oh, also, creating ISIS is rather tough to beat as far as shitty presidents go. It just shows how low the bar is that Republicans have set for their politicians.
 
Trump delivered a fairly polished speech that touched on a lot of good points, even looking to unify and extend his hand across the aisle. At the same time, a damning memo is about to be released that sounds like it'll harm the Dems. I think Trump is playing his cards well.
 
SlowSpyder said:
He certainly hasn't hurt. So much for the economic collapse that so many were saying would happen after Trump's election.
Click to expand...
Give it some time. I bet when Democrats complained that Dubya's reckless spending would tank the economy you thought they were just butthurt from losing to him then, too?
 
SlowSpyder said:
You guys are reaching so much with stuff like this.
Click to expand...
Not really.
161102145203-kkk-newspaper-trump-endorsement-exlarge-169.jpg
 
dank69 said:
Give it some time. I bet when Democrats complained that Dubya's reckless spending would tank the economy you thought they were just butthurt from losing to him then, too?
Click to expand...

Reckless spending on a war based on lies vs. giving money earned by Americans back to them is a different situation.
 
SlowSpyder said:
Reckless spending on a war based on lies vs. giving money earned by Americans back to them is a different situation.
Click to expand...
Bush "gave money back," too. It all still amounts to running up the deficit/debt when established economic theory says we should be doing the opposite. I am going to laugh and laugh when the next recession hits and we have to choose between $50-$100 trillion debt to stim our way out again or just go full blown depression for a decade or two. See you in the bread lines, comrade.
 
SlowSpyder said:
When a left wing terrorist shot up a Congressional baseball practice I don't think anyone went wild suggesting that's what the left is about. You guys are reaching so much with stuff like this.
Click to expand...
Then again I don't recall any Dems suggesting the shooter was a "fine person" or sends out dog whistles to nuts trying to shoot Congresspeople

You are weak
 
dank69 said:
Bush "gave money back," too. It all still amounts to running up the deficit/debt when established economic theory says we should be doing the opposite. I am going to laugh and laugh when the next recession hits and we have to choose between $50-$100 trillion debt to stim our way out again or just go full blown depression for a decade or two. See you in the bread lines, comrade.
Click to expand...

Silly hysterics.
 
SlowSpyder said:
The point is that because fringe elements agree with a party or endorse a candidate doesn't mean that's what that party is for.
Click to expand...
My parents are main stream R's and they are pretty extreme so I believe that I'm familiar with the ideology. Church people are rabid foaming at the mouth for the party.
 
SlowSpyder said:
The point is that because fringe elements agree with a party or endorse a candidate doesn't mean that's what that party is for.
Click to expand...
Unless you keep giving them tacit support. And hire white supremacist supporters to work for your administration in the White House.

How much more evidence do you need??
 
HomerJS said:
Then again I don't recall any Dems suggesting the shooter was a "fine person" or sends out dog whistles to nuts trying to shoot Congresspeople

You are weak
Click to expand...


You guys just don't get it. There are many white people that are not racist xenophobes that are tired of being crucified by the left over crimes they never committed, being told our hard work to achieve isn't anything more than white privilege, that have seen affirmative action affect them in real life - the only socially acceptable racism today. These people are not white supremacists, but to today's out of touch left, anyone that doesn't get in line with their totalitarian left of common sense views is labeled a racist and a bigot. But they are not, and that's who Trump speaks to. He isn't endorsing David Duke's views or white supremacy. But you're too busy fighting the exaggerated caricature you create in your mind to see things for what they really are.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top