State department: Hillary did not comply with policies

Page 15 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Hayabusa Rider

Admin Emeritus & Elite Member
Jan 26, 2000
50,879
4,267
126
No one wonders why this "scandal still has legs", we know exactly why. We know it's still going on because the Republicans want it to go on and their braindead supporters will eat up any morsel thrown at them.

You havent got out much. People who aren't Republicans don't trust or believe her. You got behind the worst possible choice and pushed and now you have to go into attack mode because no one (well hardly anyone) believes her. Heck Politico has an article about Trump AND Hillary, and guess what? Most people laugh when either name is used in the same sentence as trust. Psst, those are Republicans about Trump and Democrats about Hillary. Your problem is bigger than you realize.
 

Starbuck1975

Lifer
Jan 6, 2005
14,698
1,909
126
Can't he be compelled to testify or else held in contempt if he refuses to testify after being granted immunity?
Apparently questions on Pagliano are fair game under the discovery scope, and judicial watch is filing a motion for the judge to compel Mills to testify on the scope of Pagliano's role.
 

Hayabusa Rider

Admin Emeritus & Elite Member
Jan 26, 2000
50,879
4,267
126
Apparently questions on Pagliano are fair game under the discovery scope, and judicial watch is filing a motion for the judge to compel Mills to testify on the scope of Pagliano's role.

That's the whole point about immunity. The Fifth has nothing to do with conceiling truth, it's about the fact that the truth may convict the one providing testimony. Once the threat of punishment has been removed by immunity there is no legal or constitunal basis for refusing to truthfully answer.
 

werepossum

Elite Member
Jul 10, 2006
29,873
463
126
Apparently questions on Pagliano are fair game under the discovery scope, and judicial watch is filing a motion for the judge to compel Mills to testify on the scope of Pagliano's role.
Seems like Mills would still have Fifth Amendment protection though, on the grounds that testimony on the scope of Pagliano's role might tend to convict her. I don't think someone else getting immunity should remove a third party's Constitutional protections.

Besides, judging by her previous testimony I seriously doubt she even remembers him. :D
 

ivwshane

Lifer
May 15, 2000
33,229
16,532
136
You havent got out much. People who aren't Republicans don't trust or believe her. You got behind the worst possible choice and pushed and now you have to go into attack mode because no one (well hardly anyone) believes her. Heck Politico has an article about Trump AND Hillary, and guess what? Most people laugh when either name is used in the same sentence as trust. Psst, those are Republicans about Trump and Democrats about Hillary. Your problem is bigger than you realize.

Lol. You should probably go back into hiding, you apparently still have trouble following the conversation. People don't trust Hillary because of years of propaganda by Republicans, literally decades of it. Hillary is either a criminal mastermind the likes of which we have never seen or all the "scandals" Republicans have been throwing at Clinton for decades actually has some impact on our so politically educated (/s) electorate. I'll take the latter.

Thanks for your random third party vote though! The dems will thank you come November!
 
Last edited:

Fern

Elite Member
Sep 30, 2003
26,907
174
106
-snip-
I also love your bonus "logic" that Trump is unqualified to be President because of "the crudity of talking about his dick during a presidential debate", whereas Bill Clinton actually putting his dick in an intern just shows what a truly awesome President he was.

LOL :D

Fern
 

Hayabusa Rider

Admin Emeritus & Elite Member
Jan 26, 2000
50,879
4,267
126
Lol. You should probably go back into hiding, you apparently still have trouble following the conversation. People don't trust Hillary because of years of propaganda by Republicans, literally decades of it. Hillary is either a criminal mastermind the likes of which we have never seen or all the "scandals" Republicans have been throwing at Clinton for decades actually has some impact on our so politically educated electorate. I'll take the latter.

Thanks for your random third party vote though! The dems will thank you come November!

Let's see. Wall street's favorite is going to attack wall street. Big money Hillary is going to reign in Hillary.

Hell even UNU, the AI who predicted the Kentucky Derby outcome perfectly believes with 95% confidence that she can't be trusted. I supposed it was hypnotized by Trump?

Hillary may win, but any opposition should already have Trump gasping his last breath, but people who don't even like Republicans, Democrats included don't like her, but you of the Truth Faith are the only ones resistant to the evil Republicans.

Yeah, right. Don't look for a landslide and you will not have a mandate. Polecats either way.
 

ivwshane

Lifer
May 15, 2000
33,229
16,532
136
Let's see. Wall street's favorite is going to attack wall street. Big money Hillary is going to reign in Hillary.

Hell even UNU, the AI who predicted the Kentucky Derby outcome perfectly believes with 95% confidence that she can't be trusted. I supposed it was hypnotized by Trump?

Hillary may win, but any opposition should already have Trump gasping his last breath, but people who don't even like Republicans, Democrats included don't like her, but you of the Truth Faith are the only ones resistant to the evil Republicans.

Yeah, right. Don't look for a landslide and you will not have a mandate. Polecats either way.

Lol! I liked how you referenced propaganda and a computer built on hive intelligence as some sort of counter to what I said. You even managed to throw in a straw man for good measure!

Here is the bottom line; Clinton doesn't need to have a high favorable rating, she doesn't need to score high on honesty, she doesn't need to win over independents, all she needs to do is to get more votes than trump. By all measures including the ones you seem to think matter, she beating him.

Btw, welcome back! I await your endless whining about the world of politics today.
 

brycejones

Lifer
Oct 18, 2005
29,107
29,253
136
Yea, she does.

Everyone hates her.

-John

Everyone hates Trump as well. Well not everyone, just like not everyone hates Clinton.

Both have very high unfavorables. One recent ABC poll had Trump 60% and Clinton 53% unfavorable.
 

brycejones

Lifer
Oct 18, 2005
29,107
29,253
136
Hillary is a criminal,

Trump is a Champion.

-John

Hillary isn't a criminal unless she has been convicted of a crime. She hasn't even been indicted even those indictments are supposedly incoming any 60 days now for the last 6 months.

Why don't you tell us what you think Trump is a champion of?

BTW I'm not a Hillary fan at all, but Trump is an even worse choice.
 

Zorkorist

Diamond Member
Apr 17, 2007
6,861
3
76
She's so criminal it is crazy.

That she has the balls to attack American Government.

-John
 

Hayabusa Rider

Admin Emeritus & Elite Member
Jan 26, 2000
50,879
4,267
126
Lol! I liked how you referenced propaganda and a computer built on hive intelligence as some sort of counter to what I said. You even managed to throw in a straw man for good measure!

Here is the bottom line; Clinton doesn't need to have a high favorable rating, she doesn't need to score high on honesty, she doesn't need to win over independents, all she needs to do is to get more votes than trump. By all measures including the ones you seem to think matter, she beating him.

Btw, welcome back! I await your endless whining about the world of politics today.
Good to come and visit. It's good to know that so many Democrats are no better in character than those they rail against. Doesn't matter if your choice is outstandly bad and a disaster, as long as it's you who wrecks things it's OK

BTW, the latest shows Hildabeast is only 4 up on Trumpey, and the trend is against her.

Remember, keep stumping for Trump! Yer doing a fine job so far :p

Adios.
 

ivwshane

Lifer
May 15, 2000
33,229
16,532
136
Good to come and visit. It's good to know that so many Democrats are no better in character than those they rail against. Doesn't matter if your choice is outstandly bad and a disaster, as long as it's you who wrecks things it's OK

BTW, the latest shows Hildabeast is only 4 up on Trumpey, and the trend is against her.

Remember, keep stumping for Trump! Yer doing a fine job so far :p

Adios.

Lol. Hillary will wreck things? Go back to your bubble.