bunnyfubbles
Lifer
- Sep 3, 2001
- 12,248
- 3
- 0
It wasn't the movie that was great, it was the concept of survival against such a siege of endless enemies that made it interesting. It provides for an excellent game type, which is why there were so many games made to honor it on games such as StarCraft; I remember playing some of those maps where you have to build bunkers and try and outlast the onslaught.
This type of game could be INCREDIBLY fun in a MMOFPS (thats right, FPS, not RPG). Where you get together with hundreds of players on a world (while you're fighting alongside only a couple dozen at a time) to defend strategic locations against long waves of bugs, and the MMO part comes into play when the bugs decide to focus their numbers on a different location so that you need to move troops to reinforce that position.
Personally I did enjoy the book more, some of the sequences in the movies just weren't as potent or fun as they were in the book.
This type of game could be INCREDIBLY fun in a MMOFPS (thats right, FPS, not RPG). Where you get together with hundreds of players on a world (while you're fighting alongside only a couple dozen at a time) to defend strategic locations against long waves of bugs, and the MMO part comes into play when the bugs decide to focus their numbers on a different location so that you need to move troops to reinforce that position.
While the LOTR movies were good and well accepted, I doubt you'll find many fans who read the book first who liked the movies as good if not better than the book. The movies were good if only because they weren't a complete let-down.Originally posted by: apoppin
QUICK - name ONE sci-fi/fantasy movie [besides LOTR] that was 'as good as' the classic book it adapted?
Personally I did enjoy the book more, some of the sequences in the movies just weren't as potent or fun as they were in the book.