Ancalagon44
Diamond Member
- Feb 17, 2010
- 3,274
- 202
- 106
SPOILERS
I enjoyed the movie, but at the same time, I think the movie destroyed the entire Star Wars saga for me. It was all stuff I already knew, but seeing in on film made it so it sunk in differently than before. Like, the part where they go into the light and the dark constantly rising and matching one another. If the light side wins, then the dark side will rise up to challenge it. When the dark side wins, the light will be raised up to challenge it. Benicio del Toro's character then revealed that the Star Wars universe has this entire population of arms dealers playing both sides. I left wondering what was the point then? The story will just keep repeating itself over and over and over, but maybe that will be addressed in the final movie.
There were moments in the movie though that I felt were particularly well done. Some of the First Order commanders realizing what the resistance was doing with the dreadnought, but were unable to act out of disobedience to stop it. I thought they did a good job of reflecting on the small moments of absurdity in a good way, and siding with what the audience was already thinking. The burning of the tree was awesome.
But, yeah, taking a heavy cruiser and sending it into warp speed directly into the enemies super warship? I think that opened up a very bad can of worms for the rest of the series considering that could have been done to the past Death Stars, Super Star Destroyers, Star Killer Base, etc.
I would have loved to have seen more with Captain Phasma's character. I would have loved to have seen a lot more from Snoke's character. We will very much miss Carrie Fischer.
I think they hinted at this with stuff like saying you have to let the past die, kill it if you have to. I think in a way, they were referring to the past history of Star Wars. They wanted to break away from that, probably for commercial reasons.
Harrison Ford is out, Mark Hamill will have one or two more scenes if he is lucky, Carrie Fisher is out (although not the way anyone wanted), etc etc.
The movie did make me realize that, while George Lucas was criticized for the prequel trilogy A LOT, you can see what he did well in terms of character arcs and character development, and looking at a story from a wider point of view and not just thinking about one movie. He looked at movies a trilogy at a time and not just the box office results.
Dare I say it? I miss George Lucas's touch. He made mistakes, but he was also a creative professional.
