Star Wars question..

Skel

Diamond Member
Apr 11, 2001
6,219
679
136
Did anyone restrict the use of light sabers? I always had the impression that the only people that had any interest in them were the ones with powers to it up, otherwise everyone just preferred having a blaster (or gun) to the sword.

The question was spawned due to the stupid meme that's floating around about no one blaming the light saber. Yes, I know it's a movie, and yes I get gun control points made with a movie automatically fail. It just brought the question to my mind.
 

mmntech

Lifer
Sep 20, 2007
17,501
12
0
According to Wookieepedia:
Due to the weightlessness of plasma and the strong gyroscopic effect generated by it, lightsabers required a great deal of strength and dexterity to wield, and it was extremely difficult—and dangerous—for the untrained to attempt using.

I believe they're also complicated to make since they require special rare crystals.
 

Sonikku

Lifer
Jun 23, 2005
15,891
4,894
136
Did anyone restrict the use of light sabers? I always had the impression that the only people that had any interest in them were the ones with powers to it up, otherwise everyone just preferred having a blaster (or gun) to the sword.

The question was spawned due to the stupid meme that's floating around about no one blaming the light saber. Yes, I know it's a movie, and yes I get gun control points made with a movie automatically fail. It just brought the question to my mind.

The crystal powers it up. Not the Jedi. (or Sith) Anybody could use one. (Like Han Solo did in Episode 5) They just aren't practical for most as non Force Sensitives would have difficulty blocking blaster bolts with one. Some non sensitives like the Mandalorian Pre Vizsla for instance uses a lightsaber though simply because he was skilled in the ways of swordsmanship.

Fun Fact: In the first draft EVERYBODY used them. Even Stormtroopers!
 
Last edited:

MongGrel

Lifer
Dec 3, 2013
38,466
3,067
121
Killing Krayt dragons used to be one of the best things for light sabres crystals long ago, but that was long ago and probably doesn't mean anything these days.

It's a game parameter, they can do whatever they want with it.

Just becoming a Jedi there was a pretty serious thing once upon a time there, and they seriously fucked that one up on CURB.
 

Skel

Diamond Member
Apr 11, 2001
6,219
679
136
"with powers to it up"? What the hell are you talking about

Sorry.. meant to say, powers to back it up.. Not that they power it. Just that with the rest of the powers that a Jedi has suddenly having a sword in a gun fight isn't stupid.
 

lupi

Lifer
Apr 8, 2001
32,539
260
126
as others said, having ability to use the force aids in properly wielding one as an effective weapon, and blaster blocking almost impossible without being a force wielder which is why they are looked down upon by most of the populace.
 

Slew Foot

Lifer
Sep 22, 2005
12,379
96
86
Why is it called the Tantive IV? How did they get roman numerals? Or ishould it relly be called Corellian numerals?
 
Feb 4, 2009
35,862
17,403
136
According to Wookieepedia:


I believe they're also complicated to make since they require special rare crystals.

Yes. Dark Sidth manufacture the crystals that's why their sabers are red. Jedi go the found in nature route.
 

mmntech

Lifer
Sep 20, 2007
17,501
12
0
Why is it called the Tantive IV? How did they get roman numerals? Or ishould it relly be called Corellian numerals?

The ship (actually most ships) is never named in the films. That came out of the expanded universe. In the original X-Wing, you see Tantives I-III. IIRC, the mission was to use them as decoys so the Empire didn't know which ship the Death Star plans were on.
 

Skel

Diamond Member
Apr 11, 2001
6,219
679
136
So I asked a friend who wrote for the Dark Horse comics, and he told me that there wasn't anything in the SW bible about anyone saying only Jedi could use the light saber. It was pretty much felt that without those Jedi reflexes and skills (or training) it didn't do one much good. To paraphrase him.."Light sabers may have been weapons for a more civilized time, but they were dangerous. You were more likely to slice off your own hand or foot rather than parry pistol blasts, without the Force to guide you."

Of course this also didn't mean much, and the SW bible everyone worked from was subjected to change the moment Lucas said something. My question on if the Empire/Jedi/whoever regulated the sabers is answered though...
 

smackababy

Lifer
Oct 30, 2008
27,024
79
86
Grievous used multiple lightsabers he took from Jedi scum! He wasn't a force user. Hell, he wasn't even a full person.
 

mmntech

Lifer
Sep 20, 2007
17,501
12
0
The Wookieepedia article on lightsabers does mention that the Emperor restricted their use to only a few authorized individuals. So I suppose possessing one was illegal after the Jedi purges.

Logically though, a firearm (or a blaster) is going to be a far better weapon than a sword. Even one that can cut through metal like a hot knife through butter. Remember when Indie shoots the swordsman in Raiders. If you don't have the Force, that's what's going to happen.

Grievous used multiple lightsabers he took from Jedi scum! He wasn't a force user. Hell, he wasn't even a full person.

Let us not speak about the prequels. :whiste:

Grievous was (mostly) a robot though so it makes sense he'd have enhanced strength and dexterity to handle them.
 

Phoenix86

Lifer
May 21, 2003
14,644
10
81
Grievous was (mostly) a robot though so it makes sense he'd have enhanced strength and dexterity to handle them.

Even if you throw out the "hard to wield" part, which they did in the prequels, the main benefit to their use was knowing the blaster shot was coming so they could block it.
 
Feb 4, 2009
35,862
17,403
136
I can't remember if he started with another weapon first but he certainly used them against Jedis, so more than trophies for sure.

I'm not a prequel fan I know he did use them but it wasn't elegant. So yeah anyone can use them but being effective us another question.
Similar to medieval times. Long bows were better but any idiot could use a crossbow pretty effectively.
 

smackababy

Lifer
Oct 30, 2008
27,024
79
86
I'm not a prequel fan I know he did use them but it wasn't elegant. So yeah anyone can use them but being effective us another question.
Similar to medieval times. Long bows were better but any idiot could use a crossbow pretty effectively.

Grievous (in the possibly defunct EU), was known as one of the best duelists in the galaxy after Dooku's training in lightsaber combat. Also, it should be noted Obi Wan actually kills Grievous with a blaster, proving long before the Empire took over, hokey religion and ancient weapons are no match for a good blaster at your side.
 

smackababy

Lifer
Oct 30, 2008
27,024
79
86
fuck that. tried it. I got a Girlfriend and hten married..and kids. IF i stayed in with my comics and computer i would have more money and toys.

How dare you know things about Star Wars! You nerd! Now, sit and watch me recite some other arbitrarily nerdy shit and pretend I'm cooler than you!
 

Skel

Diamond Member
Apr 11, 2001
6,219
679
136
The Wookieepedia article on lightsabers does mention that the Emperor restricted their use to only a few authorized individuals. So I suppose possessing one was illegal after the Jedi purges.

Logically though, a firearm (or a blaster) is going to be a far better weapon than a sword. Even one that can cut through metal like a hot knife through butter. Remember when Indie shoots the swordsman in Raiders. If you don't have the Force, that's what's going to happen.



Let us not speak about the prequels. :whiste:

Grievous was (mostly) a robot though so it makes sense he'd have enhanced strength and dexterity to handle them.

Does this "Wookieepedia" ref where they mentioned the Emperor restricting the sabers? I'm guessing it was somewhere in the EU (the old one that is) and not in the movies as no one remembers that. I do also get that none of the EU matters anymore, but as it's a stupid question in a made up universe I don't think what matters really.. matters..
 

smackababy

Lifer
Oct 30, 2008
27,024
79
86
Does this "Wookieepedia" ref where they mentioned the Emperor restricting the sabers? I'm guessing it was somewhere in the EU (the old one that is) and not in the movies as no one remembers that. I do also get that none of the EU matters anymore, but as it's a stupid question in a made up universe I don't think what matters really.. matters..

I think some of the prequel EU is still "canon" until it is rewritten. Disney has confirmed all the after Return of the Jedi EU is all done away with, but I don't see why we can't still consider things that will likely never get touched in Disney lore.