• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Stability testing IC7&PHII.

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
After reading about 13 reviews. I think I know why those guys didn't want to prime.

After reading those reviews . I think some reviewers need to learn about ethics.
 
Originally posted by: Nemesis 1
After reading about 13 reviews. I think I know why those guys didn't want to prime.

After reading those reviews . I think some reviewers need to learn about ethics.
Click to expand...

I too find the vast majority of reviews to be lacking in one regard or another, no one reviewer does everything as I would have liked to see them do it (test methodology wise as well as test suite wise) but this is what we get when the price is free.

Anand came close to making me happy when he went back and re-did some of the i7 tests to document power-consumption data during the test runs...I was hoping it would become a trend to be repeated in the PhII review.

We all know to not look a gift horse in the mouth. Had we paid $1000 for a polished analysis of the PhII architecture then yeah we'd have reason to pitch a bitch, but free means you get exactly what you paid for no matter how low the quality turns out to be.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top