Originally posted by: ViciouS
Pontiac = CRAP
GTO=400hp Stock! WOWOMG that would be so great if that POS didnt fall apart withen 2 years.
i love you to you morAn
Originally posted by: ViciouS
Pontiac = CRAP
GTO=400hp Stock! WOWOMG that would be so great if that POS didnt fall apart withen 2 years.
Originally posted by: nourdmrolNMT1
Originally posted by: ViciouS
Pontiac = CRAP
GTO=400hp Stock! WOWOMG that would be so great if that POS didnt fall apart withen 2 years.
i love you to you morAn
Originally posted by: Theguynextdoor
The ecotec engine is beastly. Capable of 1000HP...from a four-banger.
Solstice is so much better looking then the miata. Same thing with the sky. All three of them are bitches cars, but nothing wrong with that. I'd buy it for my gf/wife.
Originally posted by: Googer
Originally posted by: fbrdphreak
Originally posted by: Googer
Easy, Take a Civic change the car a bit (maybe leather, better wheels, turbo, etc) and change an extra 75k. Bam A Halo Car!Not even going there. You obviously don't listen even though Mike tried to ram it into your skull
I don't think anyone here said Solstice is going to "sustain" GM. It will certainly take off well and if they can create the kind of following that cars like the Miata have then it will keep going. Even if it DOESN'T keep going, what's wrong with that? It helps boost GM up a bit, people get a kick @$$ car that is right for the times (and not BEYOND it), and everyone's happy.Originally posted by: Googer
Highend cars are not enough to sustain a buisness, even Porsche knows that; it is the reason why they produce a cheaper Boxster and provide industrial design services.
Okay, LINK?Originally posted by: Googer
Things Porsche Designed: Harley Davidson Engine, Grundig Radio, LaCIE Hard Drive case, Best Buy Computers, etc.
Where do you get this amount from?Originally posted by: Googer
Considering they are loosing on average of $2500 USD per car this needs to work for them.
Best Buy Brand Computers are labeld VPR. I have no links at the moment, But these are things I know from shopping around, Have read in magazenes, newspapers, watching First Buisness, etc. Some one else can can comfirm what I am saying here that Porsche Desgns things other than cars.
So my number (eh-hem memory) was a off.
But the point is that GM is loosing big time on each car. Toyota could easily pay GM for their losses and still make an average $799 profit!
GM lost an average of $1,227 per vehicle sold in North America during the first half of the year. Ford followed that with a per-vehicle loss of $139. The Chrysler group pushed into positive territory with a per-vehicle profit of $186.
Nissan, Toyota and Honda, however, all netted more than $1,000 per vehicle, with Nissan on top with $1,826.
Toyota followed with a per-vehicle net of $1,488, and then Honda with $1,023.
http://www.greencarcongress.com/2005/08/gm_leads_in_los.html
Originally posted by: Googer
Originally posted by: Pocatello
Originally posted by: Googer
Originally posted by: nourdmrolNMT1
Originally posted by: Googer
Originally posted by: Insane3D
Looks meh to me...especially that stupid front grille Pontiac uses..
I second that!
Leave it to gm to make a car that has potential to look great then F it up. The Solstice would have been a looker oh about 7 years ago. Todays cars have more of a curved look with sharp geometric accect lines. The solstice has none of that. But may be if they can build up some performance credibility then it might sell.
might sell?
you mean the car that already has 10000 orders before it ever hit the showroom? when the max they can produce is about 20-30k a year?
yea it might sell![]()
Ok, but will it have a loyal following like the Jeep Wrangler or Mazda Miata has? That is what I mean by a car that sells.
A lot of car models sell well their first year but after the initial demand has been met is their going to be enough repeat demand to keep the nameplate alive? I am not sure and I doubt that the car is as technologicly advanced as the S2000 or Miata; GM has been slacking in these areas.
The Miata has been successful because it's a simple, pure sport car at an affordable price, not a technology marvel. I wouldn't say the S2000 has been that successful in term of sales number.
That is not what I said. The S2000 is not a big seller, but I was refering to how it is more technologicly advanced than what GM builds.
Where I made the refrence to sales is The Wrangler and Miata enjoy a cult following, it is the only thing that keeps their brands alive, they are not selling more and more of them to first time buyers of that model. Buyers of Miatas and Jeeps are people who have already owned that car and are back for seconds. Other than old ladies buying caddies or Baby Boomer buying 'vetts, I cannot think of any car GM makes (trucks excluded) that keeps lots of people coming back for more.
Originally posted by: Theguynextdoor
Originally posted by: Googer
Originally posted by: Pocatello
Originally posted by: Googer
Originally posted by: nourdmrolNMT1
Originally posted by: Googer
Originally posted by: Insane3D
Looks meh to me...especially that stupid front grille Pontiac uses..
I second that!
Leave it to gm to make a car that has potential to look great then F it up. The Solstice would have been a looker oh about 7 years ago. Todays cars have more of a curved look with sharp geometric accect lines. The solstice has none of that. But may be if they can build up some performance credibility then it might sell.
might sell?
you mean the car that already has 10000 orders before it ever hit the showroom? when the max they can produce is about 20-30k a year?
yea it might sell![]()
Ok, but will it have a loyal following like the Jeep Wrangler or Mazda Miata has? That is what I mean by a car that sells.
A lot of car models sell well their first year but after the initial demand has been met is their going to be enough repeat demand to keep the nameplate alive? I am not sure and I doubt that the car is as technologicly advanced as the S2000 or Miata; GM has been slacking in these areas.
The Miata has been successful because it's a simple, pure sport car at an affordable price, not a technology marvel. I wouldn't say the S2000 has been that successful in term of sales number.
That is not what I said. The S2000 is not a big seller, but I was refering to how it is more technologicly advanced than what GM builds.
Where I made the refrence to sales is The Wrangler and Miata enjoy a cult following, it is the only thing that keeps their brands alive, they are not selling more and more of them to first time buyers of that model. Buyers of Miatas and Jeeps are people who have already owned that car and are back for seconds. Other than old ladies buying caddies or Baby Boomer buying 'vetts, I cannot think of any car GM makes (trucks excluded) that keeps lots of people coming back for more.
What do you call the Corvette? Corvette sells 35,000 units ANNUALLY. They also have the largest profit margin of all GM's car line. I have one and I love it, drive it 800 miles EVERY weekend back and forth between home and school. Reliable, comfortable, and the power's all there.
Silvarado has a heavy loyalty line, along with many of the GMC lines. (Reason why it's not dead). Caddy's entire line are mostly repeat customers, however in teh past 3 years their QC has been through the roof, and have built a much larger younger base (25-35 yr old range). :beer:
Originally posted by: Googer
Originally posted by: Theguynextdoor
The ecotec engine is beastly. Capable of 1000HP...from a four-banger.
Solstice is so much better looking then the miata. Same thing with the sky. All three of them are bitches cars, but nothing wrong with that. I'd buy it for my gf/wife.
Really? Is that true? Show me some video, photgraps, or links!
Originally posted by: Googer
Originally posted by: Theguynextdoor
Originally posted by: Googer
Originally posted by: Pocatello
Originally posted by: Googer
Originally posted by: nourdmrolNMT1
Originally posted by: Googer
Originally posted by: Insane3D
Looks meh to me...especially that stupid front grille Pontiac uses..
I second that!
Leave it to gm to make a car that has potential to look great then F it up. The Solstice would have been a looker oh about 7 years ago. Todays cars have more of a curved look with sharp geometric accect lines. The solstice has none of that. But may be if they can build up some performance credibility then it might sell.
might sell?
you mean the car that already has 10000 orders before it ever hit the showroom? when the max they can produce is about 20-30k a year?
yea it might sell![]()
Ok, but will it have a loyal following like the Jeep Wrangler or Mazda Miata has? That is what I mean by a car that sells.
A lot of car models sell well their first year but after the initial demand has been met is their going to be enough repeat demand to keep the nameplate alive? I am not sure and I doubt that the car is as technologicly advanced as the S2000 or Miata; GM has been slacking in these areas.
The Miata has been successful because it's a simple, pure sport car at an affordable price, not a technology marvel. I wouldn't say the S2000 has been that successful in term of sales number.
That is not what I said. The S2000 is not a big seller, but I was refering to how it is more technologicly advanced than what GM builds.
Where I made the refrence to sales is The Wrangler and Miata enjoy a cult following, it is the only thing that keeps their brands alive, they are not selling more and more of them to first time buyers of that model. Buyers of Miatas and Jeeps are people who have already owned that car and are back for seconds. Other than old ladies buying caddies or Baby Boomer buying 'vetts, I cannot think of any car GM makes (trucks excluded) that keeps lots of people coming back for more.
What do you call the Corvette? Corvette sells 35,000 units ANNUALLY. They also have the largest profit margin of all GM's car line. I have one and I love it, drive it 800 miles EVERY weekend back and forth between home and school. Reliable, comfortable, and the power's all there.
Silvarado has a heavy loyalty line, along with many of the GMC lines. (Reason why it's not dead). Caddy's entire line are mostly repeat customers, however in teh past 3 years their QC has been through the roof, and have built a much larger younger base (25-35 yr old range). :beer:
You did not read my other post in this message forum. GM cannot build a small (non-performance/luxury) car that comes close to matching the repeat buyer numbers of Toyota's (Camry/Corolla) or Honda (Civic/Accord) I am talking lowend cars, GM Just cant seem to do it right.
Originally posted by: Theguynextdoor
Where the hell did he go? I compliment him and he leaves.
