Sprint announced a new pricing strategy today, and I was just wondering what everyone thought of it:
link to official press release
Thoughts?
link to official press release
Thoughts?
Where do you live? I see that plan, but it only gives 1000 anytime minutes with no N/W minutes or mobile-to-mobile minutes.Originally posted by: MazerRackham
300 minutes for $35, then (at best) an additional 100 minutes for $5 more (2 x 50 minutes for $2.50 each)? I don't see how that's a good thing. I guess if you go WAY over it is, but I have the promotional plan from T-Mobile where I get 1000 anytime minutes plus unlimited night and weekends for $40 per month.
The most minutes I've ever used in a month was 550, and that was over the holidays.
How many people go hundreds of minutes over their base plans anyway?
Originally posted by: Ilmater
Where do you live? I see that plan, but it only gives 1000 anytime minutes with no N/W minutes or mobile-to-mobile minutes.Originally posted by: MazerRackham
300 minutes for $35, then (at best) an additional 100 minutes for $5 more (2 x 50 minutes for $2.50 each)? I don't see how that's a good thing. I guess if you go WAY over it is, but I have the promotional plan from T-Mobile where I get 1000 anytime minutes plus unlimited night and weekends for $40 per month.
The most minutes I've ever used in a month was 550, and that was over the holidays.
How many people go hundreds of minutes over their base plans anyway?
Plus, you're stuck with T-Mobile's coverage (smallest of the top 5 carriers), and you may lose coverage in the Southwest as the rumors are that Cingular is trying to wiggle out of its network-sharing agreement with them.
Finally, what do you think about someone that has a $60 plan? What if they go UNDER their minutes? They get to save money.
Yes, clearly if you're using less than ANY carrier's lowest-minute plan, you wouldn't have any benefit from this.Originally posted by: sandmanwake
The plan starts at $45/month in my area. Not good at all considering I'm paying $35 for 300 anytime minutes and I'm lucky to use half of that at all.
Sprint's PTT feature is already available. I personally have no use for it, but it's there. The initial call setup time is about 4-5 seconds IIRC, but once the call is set up, it's as fast as Nextel's PTT. Verizon's PTT, on the other hand, is HORRIBLE! I wouldn't touch that, especially for $20.Originally posted by: Shockwave
Forgot to mention, they also have the Push To Talk feature coming up as well. And BlueTooth is "In the works" (Its availbale but phones are scarce)
Originally posted by: Ilmater
Sprint's PTT feature is already available. I personally have no use for it, but it's there. The initial call setup time is about 4-5 seconds IIRC, but once the call is set up, it's as fast as Nextel's PTT. Verizon's PTT, on the other hand, is HORRIBLE! I wouldn't touch that, especially for $20.Originally posted by: Shockwave
Forgot to mention, they also have the Push To Talk feature coming up as well. And BlueTooth is "In the works" (Its availbale but phones are scarce)
As for Bluetooth, the only handset currently available is the SonyEricsson T608, and it's only available if you call in. I don't honestly know what the plans are for the future.
I don't know about that, but it already works pretty well. Like I said, the initial setup time isn't too bad (actually, I'm thinking the average was 6 seconds), and after that it's near-instantaneous. I don't know how much better they can get on a CDMA network that wasn't designed for it. It's basically a VoIP call, so it stands to reason that it will take a second.Originally posted by: Shockwave
Originally posted by: Ilmater
Sprint's PTT feature is already available. I personally have no use for it, but it's there. The initial call setup time is about 4-5 seconds IIRC, but once the call is set up, it's as fast as Nextel's PTT. Verizon's PTT, on the other hand, is HORRIBLE! I wouldn't touch that, especially for $20.Originally posted by: Shockwave
Forgot to mention, they also have the Push To Talk feature coming up as well. And BlueTooth is "In the works" (Its availbale but phones are scarce)
As for Bluetooth, the only handset currently available is the SonyEricsson T608, and it's only available if you call in. I don't honestly know what the plans are for the future.
I know that its there, but *IF* what I have heard is true its still undergoing some work which would make it much better then it already is
As long as it's a good idea for consumers and Sprint still makes a profit, it's a good thing overall IMO.Originally posted by: NutBucket
Personal opinion is that sprint is gonna lose out on a lot of profit. Other then that, its a good idea![]()
Originally posted by: Ilmater
As long as it's a good idea for consumers and Sprint still makes a profit, it's a good thing overall IMO.Originally posted by: NutBucket
Personal opinion is that sprint is gonna lose out on a lot of profit. Other then that, its a good idea![]()
Not even "$2 for 10,000 minutes a month" T-Mobile is going to offer a plan that cheap. It's just not something that's worthwhile for the carriers. You have to remember that there are large subsidies on phones that have to be recouped.Originally posted by: rh71
they'll get a lot more customers if there's a < $30 plan. I hate paying more than that per month X 3 phones.
Maybe it will and maybe it won't, but that's why I posted this topic. I'm curious if anyone will like it or not.Originally posted by: NutBucket
Originally posted by: Ilmater
As long as it's a good idea for consumers and Sprint still makes a profit, it's a good thing overall IMO.Originally posted by: NutBucket
Personal opinion is that sprint is gonna lose out on a lot of profit. Other then that, its a good idea![]()
That's just it. While they're reporting fewer losses they're still losses. I wonder if this will really attract that many new subscribers.
HAHA I pay $40 for 600. Frig off, sprint.Sprint PCS Fair & Flexible is a tiered pricing plan providing a base 300 Anytime Minutes for $35 a month
