"Seriously, how many football players major in something that isn't related to sports management, sociology, business or psychology?"
This thread may be full of more bad information than anything I've seen on here in a long, long time.
Most athletes on scholarships are majoring in things other than sports /management-sociology-business-psychology.
The problem here is that the 'few' who are truly academically inept get all of the publicity, while the majority of student/athletes you hear nothing about. Sure, Myron Rolle is the exception, but you get the point.
99% of scholarship athletes aren't going to be pro athletes, and yes, some percentage of them will go on to careers around the sport they played - but what's so wrong about that? Should a musician not get into teaching music even if they weren't good enough to get into a symphony?
As for the guy at Pitt - shens - Professors are the LAST people at a university that are going to be giving athletes pre-filled out tests. Should be shut down all the fraternities and sororities that have test-sharing processes too?
I say this having been a DI athlete and rooming with another DI athlete, who, as a three year starter, had a good chance at a pro career before breaking his leg.
What about the argument that revenue generating scholarship athletes should get a small stipend - given the fact that they are not allowed to work during school and their team is making money for the university?
Bottom line here is that athletic scholarships are not a problem. Yes, there are a handful of athletes that have no intention of graduating - the 'one and done' basketball players are a good example - but we are talking about 15, maybe 20 kids a year like that? It's like .0001% of scholarship athletes - in other words, it doesn't matter. At many schools, these sports bring in money that helps pay for other programs - academics included!