• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Splinter Cell Blacklist

Why no attempt to properly punctuate your OP or thread title, or even to get the name of the game correct?

Also, any system meeting the minimum requirements can technically 'max' a game. The question is whether it will run at an acceptable framerate while 'maxed'. What is acceptable to you? 30fps? 60fps? 120fps? Without this information people will answer the question based on their own assumption about what an acceptable framerate is.
 
Grammar!

It should be obvious to you and everyone else here that English is not the OP's first language. Ask politely for a clarification.
-- stahlhart
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Maybe ur cpu is oced thats y but i have i5 @stock thats y fips too much people said earlier i cant max out aa with 770 thn.how r u doing with 760
 
your cpu at stock is as fast or faster than his oced 8350. and many people are full of crap and/or dont explain the exact settings they use. its more fun for them to say "maxed out" even when that is not truly how they are running the game. I always list the exact settings including the exact type and level of AA being used.

that said it seems like you need to stop focusing on maxing every setting and just adjust the settings until you get the framerate you want. for most games that will usually only mean lowering the AA level a notch or two at 1080 since a 770 is high end card.
 
SSAA will double or quadruple the resolution and then scale it down to your monitor, usually has the best image quality but relies on the card being able to render massive resolutions.

MSAA is the most standard technique and can have a large memory footprint and depending on how much detail it needs to work can take up a considerable chunk of GPU. Saying that Keplar has surprised me at how many games I can stick 16x MSAA on and still keep games above 60FPS.

FXAA uses shader power to blur the edges and in some games does blur the textures quite a bit, it's probably the least intensive method.

TXAA is Nvidia's technique that is apparently great with fast motion, but again some people complain about blurring. Apparently it's not best judged from screenshots

SMAA is the latest and isn't very taxing on the card at all and is much better at working with likes at all angles than most.

Check out the 2nd half of this video: http://vimeo.com/31247769
 
I've been running it on High with FXAA on my laptop in the mid 40's for fps. The game utilizes 4 threads very well; I can see your 2500k being a bottleneck if at low clocks.

When I first got the game, it preset everything to medium with SSAA at 4x. My fps was in the 20's until I rchanged it to FXAA. The game also uses slightly over half a gig of VRAM at 1080p.
 
If you overclock then probably. My OC'd 780 never ever dips below 60@1440p with everything cranked using FXAA.

I think TXAA is pretty awesome. Maybe it's because I'm at 1440p, but i don't notice any blurring, and it seems to be miles better than MXAA. I just stick to FXAA though because TXAA occasionally dips below 60fps
 
Last edited:
hawtdawg said:
If you overclock then probably. My OC'd 780 never ever dips below 60@1440p with everything cranked using FXAA.

I think TXAA is pretty awesome. Maybe it's because I'm at 1440p, but i don't notice any blurring, and it seems to be miles better than MXAA. I just stick to FXAA though because TXAA occasionally dips below 60fps
Click to expand...

can u tell me the fps with txaa or msaa max?
 
spat55 said:
Grammar!

It should be obvious to you and everyone else here that English is not the OP's first language. Ask politely for a clarification.
-- stahlhart
Click to expand...
I'd just like to point out that the only thing that made that at all apparent was his use of the rupees monetary denomination. Otherwise, his post would pass quite well for the average American tween/teen, which is a credit to him and a discredit to the grammar skills of American youth. :colbert: It's quite easy to see why people could have overlooked that it wasn't his first language, particularly since the rupees reference was in a later reply.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top