Spinning the lie:

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Czar

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
28,510
0
0
Originally posted by: MartyTheManiak
Originally posted by: BaDaBooM
rolleye.gif
It's still too early to tell.

I agree. We must give the inspectors more time!
lol, the irony :D

 

cpumaster

Senior member
Dec 10, 2000
708
0
0
Originally posted by: Czar
Originally posted by: MartyTheManiak
Originally posted by: BaDaBooM
rolleye.gif
It's still too early to tell.

I agree. We must give the inspectors more time!
lol, the irony :D

Maybe the WMD wasn't meant to be found, so we may have reason to stay in Iraq as long as we want . You know, we don't want to leave before we find them or they might suddenly appear and fall into hands of another uncooperative regime ;)

 

jjones

Lifer
Oct 9, 2001
15,424
2
0
Originally posted by: Vadatajs
Speculation about how Saddam may have used his alleged wmd program is useless. The point is our leaders lied to us. That is inexcusabe. Bush should be impeached.
I don't think the Bush admin so much as lied as bent the truth near to breaking. I have no doubt in my mind that eventually Saddam's secret WMD development program will come to light. For me, given the past 12 year history, I had some reservations about going to war to oust Saddam but not too much, and if I could have known in advance it would turn out like it did, I wouldn't have had any reservations at all.

Eventually, if Saddam were left in power, France and Russia would have prevailed in lifting UN sanctions and then in a few years Saddam would have been right where he left off prior to the Gulf War. And it would be pretty much guaranteed that one of his first objectives would be to get a nuclear weapons program going. All in all, I'm not upset about his demise and my only contention is that the Bush admin handled the whole thing badly.

 

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
74,770
6,770
126
Eventually, if Saddam were left in power, France and Russia would have prevailed in lifting UN sanctions and then in a few years Saddam would have been right where he left off prior to the Gulf War. And it would be pretty much guaranteed that one of his first objectives would be to get a nuclear weapons program going. All in all, I'm not upset about his demise and my only contention is that the Bush admin handled the whole thing badly
----------------------------
Fro crap sakes, jj, when did you become Nostradamus. The world should unite to destroy the US to prevent the Catastrophy of 2030 when the American Bug gets loose.

In you nave to contory your thinking to that degree it ought to be as obvious to you as it is to me you've created a huge rationalization for yourself. I heard from my aunt's brother's cousin that Iraq will become a danger. We'd better kill them now. Geez

You have no doubt in your mind. Where have I heard that before? How many millions and millions has that killed?
 

jjones

Lifer
Oct 9, 2001
15,424
2
0
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
Eventually, if Saddam were left in power, France and Russia would have prevailed in lifting UN sanctions and then in a few years Saddam would have been right where he left off prior to the Gulf War. And it would be pretty much guaranteed that one of his first objectives would be to get a nuclear weapons program going. All in all, I'm not upset about his demise and my only contention is that the Bush admin handled the whole thing badly
----------------------------
Fro crap sakes, jj, when did you become Nostradamus. The world should unite to destroy the US to prevent the Catastrophy of 2030 when the American Bug gets loose.

In you nave to contory your thinking to that degree it ought to be as obvious to you as it is to me you've created a huge rationalization for yourself. I heard from my aunt's brother's cousin that Iraq will become a danger. We'd better kill them now. Geez

You have no doubt in your mind. Where have I heard that before? How many millions and millions has that killed?
Moonie, honestly I don't give a rat's ass what you think about how I rationalize or justify my decisions. I felt Saddam's ass should have been kicked out in '91 and just about any reason to do it since then is good enough for me. As for France and Russia, they already tried to get sanctions lifted so I don't need to be a Nostrodamus about that.

 

Bleep

Diamond Member
Oct 9, 1999
3,972
0
0
Moonie, honestly I don't give a rat's ass what you think about how I rationalize or justify my decisions. I felt Saddam's ass should have been kicked out in '91 and just about any reason to do it since then is good enough for me. As for France and Russia, they already tried to get sanctions lifted so I don't need to be a Nostrodamus about that

Then why are you giving it so much attention, time, and effort to almost think.

Bleep
 

BaliBabyDoc

Lifer
Jan 20, 2001
10,737
0
0
Have you seen Condaleeza Rice? can you imagine having her "getting down on her knees" on you? I don't think so... at least Monica wasn't that ugly...

Dude you must be joking?! Condy Rice is hot . . . she needs an orthodontist and some protein powder . . . but otherwise I would definitely invite her over for dinner . . . assuming the wife is out of town.:D
 

cpumaster

Senior member
Dec 10, 2000
708
0
0
Originally posted by: BaliBabyDoc
Have you seen Condaleeza Rice? can you imagine having her "getting down on her knees" on you? I don't think so... at least Monica wasn't that ugly...

Dude you must be joking?! Condy Rice is hot . . . she needs an orthodontist and some protein powder . . . but otherwise I would definitely invite her over for dinner . . . assuming the wife is out of town.:D

Condy is as hot as carrot stick is to the ladies (from CALL-ATT). If I was given a choice of doing it with her or being sent to an isolated/desolated island, I'd choose the island, at least my hands are prettier than her :)
 

Alistar7

Lifer
May 13, 2002
11,978
0
0
Spinning the lie:
Created by Moonbeam


the master at his craft enlightens us with his art....
 

Insane3D

Elite Member
May 24, 2000
19,446
0
0
Originally posted by: Alistar7
Spinning the lie:
Created by Moonbeam


the master at his craft enlightens us with his art....

Can you elaborate? Or are you just passing through?
 

Alistar7

Lifer
May 13, 2002
11,978
0
0
Originally posted by: Insane3D
No...it's all about the freedom baby! Forget about those WMD's...it was really the freedom of the Iraqi people we were going to war for.
rolleye.gif


:p

I will elaborate on this topic
here.

as far as the article itself..

She has no doubt that the US-led coalition, assisted by experts from Britain and Australia, will find Iraq's WMD programs. But for the first time, Dr Rice is saying publicly that it is less likely many actual weapons will be found. Rather, she described the programs as being hidden in so-called "dual use" infrastructure. In other words, chemicals and biological agents could be in plants, factories and laboratories capable of being used for legal and prohibited purposes.

Surrendered Iraqi scientists have said the same thing, disagree, aruge with them.

Moon is just out bashing bush as usual, that article just tells me they are getting better information form those on the inside and aware of current protocol. Maybe Moon can tell me where these went...

"UNSCOM supervised the destruction of more than 40,000 chemical munitions, nearly 500,000 liters of chemical agents, 1.8 million liters of chemical precursors, and seven different types of delivery systems, including ballistic missile warheads.
More than 10 years after the Gulf war, gaps in Iraqi accounting and current production capabilities strongly suggest that Iraq maintains a stockpile of chemical agents, probably VX,[3] sarin, cyclosarin,[4] and mustard.


Iraq probably has concealed precursors, production equipment, documentation, and other items necessary for continuing its CW effort. Baghdad never supplied adequate evidence to support its claims that it destroyed all of its CW agents and munitions. Thousands of tons of chemical precursors and tens of thousands of unfilled munitions, including Scud-variant missile warheads, remain unaccounted for.

UNSCOM discovered a document at Iraqi Air Force headquarters in July 1998 showing that Iraq overstated by at least 6,000 the number of chemical bombs it told the UN it had used during the Iran-Iraq War?bombs that remain are unaccounted for.

seems some were ready to go, but generally post 1991 they went totally mobile, dual use, hidden programs, etc....

Besides which we have found plenty of modern french, german, russian, and chineese banned weaopons those "villified" inspectors missed. Hard to blame them when they had to rely solely on Saddam's compliance though.
 

BaliBabyDoc

Lifer
Jan 20, 2001
10,737
0
0
Your position is ridiculous b/c Bush NEVER argued that Iraq was teeming with dual use technology. He said Iraq had stockpiled WMD which was an imminent threat to the US and its allies.

By your warped logic . . . vital chlorine for creating potable water supplies, media necessary to culture host cells for developing live, attenuated vaccines, and any CPU above 500Mhz are considered comparable to VX warheads, botulinum stocks, and gas centrifuges.
 

BaliBabyDoc

Lifer
Jan 20, 2001
10,737
0
0
Spin your version of why we went to war however you choose. You cannot revise Bush's address to the UN last September or any subsequent statement which clearly (at least to the extent possible considering the source) states the primary reason for invasion is the stockpiles of material AND a nuclear development program on the cusp of success.

Face the facts . . . Bush commited a fraud . . . bait and switch. They decided on the goal (kick Saddam's arse) and hatched a plan sufficient to curry the semblance of support.
 

LunarRay

Diamond Member
Mar 2, 2003
9,993
1
76
Originally posted by: sMiLeYz
Ummmmm... ummmm.... at least Bush didnt have extra marridal affair with Rice and deny it like our previous administration!

And how do you know that.... He does look a bit chipper these days.. don't ya think.

 

LunarRay

Diamond Member
Mar 2, 2003
9,993
1
76
Originally posted by: IGBT
Saddam him self was a weapon of mass destruction when you concider the withering effect he had on the Iraq population..torture chambers..mass burial sites..legions of missing people..embezzlement of oil revenue. Illegal pipe line to Seria. In the comming months more will be discovered. I can also understand how the marxist protesters are trying to hang their hat on anything they can to rationalize their reckless pre war behavior.

I am beginning to doubt he really existed.... maybe when they find all the doubles they can focus on the WMD Saddam and at least one thing perwar will be uncovered..

 

BarneyFife

Diamond Member
Aug 12, 2001
3,875
0
76
Originally posted by: sMiLeYz
Ummmmm... ummmm.... at least Bush didnt have extra marridal affair with Rice and deny it like our previous administration!

I heard it was with Tricky Dick.

 

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
74,770
6,770
126
What amazes me is Alistar proclaiming me a great spin mister for posting a link and he dumps his pile of poop and proclaims it persuasive.
 

cpumaster

Senior member
Dec 10, 2000
708
0
0
please forgive her, but alistar7 just doesn't like people bashing her daddy Mr. Bush jr. aka Bush-lite the US, Iraq and Afghanistan commander-in-chief :)
 

BaDaBooM

Golden Member
May 3, 2000
1,077
1
0
Originally posted by: Vadatajs
Speculation about how Saddam may have used his alleged wmd program is useless. The point is our leaders lied to us. That is inexcusabe. Bush should be impeached.

Originally posted by: BaliBabyDoc
Spin your version of why we went to war however you choose. You cannot revise Bush's address to the UN last September or any subsequent statement which clearly (at least to the extent possible considering the source) states the primary reason for invasion is the stockpiles of material AND a nuclear development program on the cusp of success.

Face the facts . . . Bush commited a fraud . . . bait and switch. They decided on the goal (kick Saddam's arse) and hatched a plan sufficient to curry the semblance of support.

Jeez... come back in July. At that point, even I will be like wtf? But save your circle-jerk until then.
 

Bowfinger

Lifer
Nov 17, 2002
15,776
392
126
Originally posted by: BaDaBooM
Originally posted by: Vadatajs
Speculation about how Saddam may have used his alleged wmd program is useless. The point is our leaders lied to us. That is inexcusabe. Bush should be impeached.

Originally posted by: BaliBabyDoc
Spin your version of why we went to war however you choose. You cannot revise Bush's address to the UN last September or any subsequent statement which clearly (at least to the extent possible considering the source) states the primary reason for invasion is the stockpiles of material AND a nuclear development program on the cusp of success.

Face the facts . . . Bush commited a fraud . . . bait and switch. They decided on the goal (kick Saddam's arse) and hatched a plan sufficient to curry the semblance of support.

Jeez... come back in July. At that point, even I will be like wtf? But save your circle-jerk until then.

I think the point is that Bush & Co. made specific claims about huge quantities of chemical and biological weapons. They identified sites, showed photographs, etc. Bush claimed that Iraq was on the verge of having nuclear weapons, and offered proof - later determined to be fraudulent - that Iraq was buying uranium in Africa.

Yes, me may still find some NBC materials in Iraq. However, it becomes more obvious by the day that Iraq did NOT have the massive quantities reported by Bush. If it did, we would have found at least some of it by now, especially given that we allegedly knew exactly where some of it was (the photos, remember). We already know for a fact that Bush & Co. lied about some of its evidence against Iraq. It's not too hard to imagine that they lied about other evidence too.
 

CaptnKirk

Lifer
Jul 25, 2002
10,053
0
71
The simple fact that the Administration is not in a panic about not having found these weapons leads me to believe there were none in the first place. If there really had been those massive stores of material, the looting and unsecured facilities would have the Administration falling all over themselves in an effort to stop them from moving into the hands of those terrorists that we said they would be going to.

No panic to get them controlled or found = they weren't there in the first place - and they knew it, diversinary tactic for the agenda.
Mislead the people as forgivness comes easier than permission. The UN never gave authorization, especially after seeing all of the
forged and false presentations from our lying government representatives.
 

Bowfinger

Lifer
Nov 17, 2002
15,776
392
126
Originally posted by: CaptnKirk
The simple fact that the Administration is not in a panic about not having found these weapons leads me to believe there were none in the first place. If there really had been those massive stores of material, the looting and unsecured facilities would have the Administration falling all over themselves in an effort to stop them from moving into the hands of those terrorists that we said they would be going to.

No panic to get them controlled or found = they weren't there in the first place - and they knew it, diversinary tactic for the agenda.
Mislead the people as forgivness comes easier than permission. The UN never gave authorization, especially after seeing all of the
forged and false presentations from our lying government representatives.
Good point. If Bush & Co. believe Iraq had large quantities of NBC materials and if they were truly concerned these materials might make their way to terrorist groups, they should be alarmed that we haven't found anything yet. Funny that they don't seem too concerned.

 

EXman

Lifer
Jul 12, 2001
20,079
15
81
Funny that they don't seem too concerned.

I think I hear this almost daily from the administration especially in regards to Syria. clean the wax outta your ears :p