Spectek 256MB DDR PC2100 $9.98AR

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

yelo333

Senior member
Dec 13, 2003
990
0
71
I just picked up one at my local office max(like 5 min. ago), will see, as I'm not the one buying it, just got a phone call about it, and had my mom pick it up during her shopping trip - definitely still alive

AND, it has the 6A markings, as mentioned above :)

Will see when she comes home.
 

tkistre

Senior member
Apr 24, 2001
212
0
0
Originally posted by: orky56
is this deal still alive?

If you go to OfficeMax's site, and click on "In Store Specials", you will see their local ad where this deal is listed. My local ad claims the sale is until 04/25/04, which is this coming Sunday. I think that may be a misprint, as sales generally run until Saturday and a new ad starts on Sunday.
 

tkistre

Senior member
Apr 24, 2001
212
0
0
Go to OfficeMax's site and look just to the right of the center of the page under the main banner on top.
Look for a heading named "Shop in Stores." Click the link under it for "Weekly In-Store Specials." Choose New Jersey, then your city. I just went there and clicked on 7 of the cities listed and the deal was there on all of them. It is on page 2, lower left hand corner.
 

Replay

Golden Member
Aug 5, 2001
1,366
72
91
Fails Prime95 and 3DMark2001 at or above 148 MHz with PC2700 -6a Spectek chips.

This stick has 2003, week six, chip dates (0306). If you are buying this B&M maybe you will have better luck if you can find newer chips, even if they are marked as "-7" or "-75".

Worst DDR I've tested all year. Worst out of 11 sticks, from free to $20 AR. This is Spectek Select according to the box. PNY Samsung PC2700 is doing 218 & 213 MHz, Kingston PC2100 "-7" from the last OM deal is doing 216. Last may's PNY PC2100 with -6 Spectek chips is doing 193 & 195 MHz (and that is some of the worst ram I bought last year). Tested them all at 2.5/7/3/3 2.6 VDimm in an NF2 mobo with an underclocked cpu. I knew Spectek chips were low-end, but I never expected the ram to be so poor.

EDIT: Memtest86 ok overnight with 133 MHz AMD761 chipset so the stick is useable as PC2100.
 

VirtualLarry

No Lifer
Aug 25, 2001
56,570
10,205
126
Originally posted by: Replay
Fails Prime95 and 3DMark2001 at or above 148 MHz with PC2700 -6a Spectek chips.

This stick has 2003, week six, chip dates (0306). If you are buying this B&M maybe you will have better luck if you can find newer chips, even if they are marked as "-7" or "-75".

That's kind of surprising that the -6a chips are failing at PC2700 speeds. I wouldn't even bother trying to OC SpecTek chips marked with a -7 or -75 though, since the whole reason those chips ended up with the SpecTek brand name on them instead of the Micron brand name, is because they were of lesser quality and only minimally meet specs.

Originally posted by: ReplayKingston PC2100 "-7" from the last OM deal is doing 216.

That intrigues me. Were those DIMMs the generic etched-off mfg-name ones, or what were the chip brands? Now you are making me think that I shouldn't have returned my original OM KVR PC2100 purchase last week. :|

Originally posted by: ReplayLast may's PNY PC2100 with -6 Spectek chips is doing 193 & 195 MHz (and that is some of the worst ram I bought last year). Tested them all at 2.5/7/3/3 2.6 VDimm in an NF2 mobo with an underclocked cpu. I knew Spectek chips were low-end, but I never expected the ram to be so poor.

EDIT: Memtest86 ok overnight with 133 MHz AMD761 chipset so the stick is useable as PC2100.

Well, it was sold as PC2100, right? That's too bad. Guess even though it is marked with -6, it won't run reliably at that speed, and was sold as PC2100 for a reason. Reminds me of some CD-RWs I bought at CompUSA ages ago, in a 2X-rated box, but they were marked 4X on the discs. They were unreliable at 4X speeds, and only marginally reliable at 2X speeds.

 

Replay

Golden Member
Aug 5, 2001
1,366
72
91
Test everything you buy, if you can (NF2 mobo & unlocked chip is great for that). Ram is a bit like the CPU market, where a 1700XP 1.46 GHz might do 2.2 GHz. They can only sell so much of the expensive high grade ram. Plus speeds and yields should continue to rise with process improvements. So your PC2100 stick might do over 200 MHz, as many of mine do. And a newer chips, with -7 -75 markings, may beat out an older -6 chip. Testing is the only way to tell.

My 148 Mhz Spectek -6a stick has what looks like a smear of white-out across one of the small labels. Probably covering the PC2700 designation. This is my 1st Spectek branded stick, and my worst stick. Spectek -6 chips on some PNY PC2100 do 193 194 MHz. A Spectek stick may be made from Spectek ram which Micron cannot sell to any major players in the biz.

VirtualLarry, that recent Kingston 216 Mhz pc2100 stick is "-7" USA noname ram. OM B&M.

Last year's cheap ram:
2.5/7/3/3 2.6 VDimm NF2 single channel, underclocked cpu (purchase dates shown).

PNY 256DDR "A" PC2100 -6 Spectek chips Staples April-03| Passed 3DMark2001 195Mhz.
PNY 256DDR "B" PC2100 -6 Spectek chips, Staples May-03 | 193 MHz.
KByte 256DDR Elixer PC2700 -6, OMax Sept-03 | 207 MHz.
Kingston 256DDR "A" PC2100 -7 China, OMax June-03 | Passed 3DMark2001 203.
Kingston 256DDR "B" PC2100 -7 China, OMax Sept-03 | Passed 3DMark2001 at 198.
Kingston 256DDR "C" PC2100 -75 noname, OMax Sept-03 | Passed 3DMark2001 at 178 MHz. Not stable in 7KJD, but fine in NForce. Funny looking stick with 4 unused pads + 4 chips on each side .
Kingston 256DDR "D" PC2100 -7 noname, OMax Jan-04 | Passed 3DMark2001 at 213.8.
Kingston 256DDR "E" PC2100 -7 USA, OMax B&M Apr-04 | 3Dmark2001 217.42 and Prime95v21 216.5
PNY 256DDR PC2700 Samsung "A" Staples Feb-04 | 3Dmark2001 218.7 MHz
PNY 256DDR PC2700 Samsung "B" Staples Feb-04 | 3DMark2001 at 213.8.
Spectek 256DDR PC2100 -6 Spectek chips 0306, OM Apr-04 | Passed 3DMark2001 at 151 MHz, and Prime95v21 at 148 MHz. Memtest86 ok 17 passes overnight in 7KJD at 137 MHz.

I do the quick 3DMark2001 test, then Prime95, (which takes longer, and usually fails at a lower speed), and finish up with Memtest86 overnight. Then the install is Prime95 tested for a day.
 

Subodim

Member
Apr 7, 2004
38
0
0
Originally posted by: Replay
Fails Prime95 and 3DMark2001 at or above 148 MHz with PC2700 -6a Spectek chips.

This stick has 2003, week six, chip dates (0306).
I just tested a SpecTek "-6A" module with Memtest-86. It got 112 errors in three passes at 133MHz. Not good. The chip date is the same as yours (0306). That must have been a bad week. The test computer I'm using has an Athlon XP 2600+ and an ECS K7VTA3 (a combo from Fry's Electronics). When I return it to OfficeMax, I think I'll try to find one with a newer date. (One of the stores I called on Tuesday said they might get receive some more on Thursday.)

Update: I'm testing another SpecTek "-6A" module right now (also 0306), and it's doing a little better. It got 4 errors in five passes at 166MHz, and so far it has gotten "only" 4 errors in seven passes at 133MHz. What do you think--is that stable enough for everyday use, or should I take it back to OM?

The funny thing is, if I selected "By SPD" to set the DRAM speed, the module would automatically run at 166MHz by default. (The CPU has a 166MHz FSB, but I thought the memory would run at its rated speed if I selected "By SPD".) I had to set it manually to run at 133MHz. The same thing happened when I installed the same module on an another Fry's combo, an ECS 848P-A with a Pentium 4 2.4GHz, and that particular CPU has a 133MHz (533MHz quad-pumped) FSB. The same thing also happened when I installed a PQI "PC2100" module in the K7VTA3 (again, the RAM chips appear to be PC2700). Luckily, the PQI module seems to run okay at 166MHz; I tested it with Memtest-86, and there weren't any errors after five passes at 166MHz. But the lesson here seems to be that you need to set your RAM speed manually when you use memory like this (unless I'm doing something wrong).
 

VirtualLarry

No Lifer
Aug 25, 2001
56,570
10,205
126
Originally posted by: Replay
Test everything you buy, if you can (NF2 mobo & unlocked chip is great for that). Ram is a bit like the CPU market, where a 1700XP 1.46 GHz might do 2.2 GHz. They can only sell so much of the expensive high grade ram. Plus speeds and yields should continue to rise with process improvements. So your PC2100 stick might do over 200 MHz, as many of mine do. And a newer chips, with -7 -75 markings, may beat out an older -6 chip. Testing is the only way to tell.

Well that may well be for CPUs, but from what I've read, on AT's memory reviews, and people's comments, it seems as though the DRAM being made today is actually of lesser quality than it used to be.

The best-performing DRAM, at least in terms of desktop DDR memory and timings, was arguably Winbond's BH5/BH6 chip series. Sadly, they don't even make them any more, because they've exited the market. So have several other previously first-tier DRAM mfgs.

See, the one thing in this equation of quality/price/new tech, that you didn't point out is, the Koreans (mainly), have increased their production/supply, and lowered their prices, in an attempt to corner the global commidity DRAM market. This is much like any other tech mfg sector. There are certain players in the market, that produce _quality_ goods, and refuse to do otherwise, lest their brand reputation suffer. The flip side of that is, they require a certain market price/profit margin in order to continue production of that product for that market. If the market price is eventually forced too low, say, by lower-quality mfgs flooding the market with inferior product, then they may be forced to exit the market because of lack of sustainable profitability.

This is what happened with the CDRW market. Yamaha left the market, because they produced a quality product, and refused to compete on price alone against the producers from China and Taiwan. Most of the first-tier major mfgs in the CDRW market are completely gone now. Plextor is the exception. Instead of continuing to produce quality products, they decided to compete on price alone as well, and most of their product line is made in China now.

The same thing has also happened in the DRAM market. Winbond has left, and I think NEC and Toshiba have also left, although I think Toshiba has a technology-licensing agreement with one of the other mfgs.

Meanwhile, Goldstar/LGS, Samsung, Hynix, and some company called "powerchip", along with Micron, produce the majority of DRAM product on the market now.

So as technology advances, and prices go down, well, unfortunately, so does the quality. (For example, look at monitors. 19" CRT monitors built today, are far cheaper than they used to be 5-8 years ago. They are also largely completely CRAP, at least IMHO, having used first-tier monitors from ages ago, and having very sensitive eyesight.)

(Sorry for the long rant, but it had to be said.)

Originally posted by: ReplayMy 148 Mhz Spectek -6a stick has what looks like a smear of white-out across one of the small labels. Probably covering the PC2700 designation. This is my 1st Spectek branded stick, and my worst stick. Spectek -6 chips on some PNY PC2100 do 193 194 MHz. A Spectek stick may be made from Spectek ram which Micron cannot sell to any major players in the biz.

VirtualLarry, that recent Kingston 216 Mhz pc2100 stick is "-7" USA noname ram. OM B&M.

Sure it's from USA? The DIMMs with no-branded chips said "Made in China" on the sticker.
Interesting testing stats, thanks.
 

Goopster

Senior member
Mar 31, 2003
251
0
0
returned mine last night because it had 184 pins i needed one with 168 pins. Lost $5 shipping in this deal.
 

MrRobercik

Member
Oct 27, 2003
76
0
0
I picked up two of those on Sunday. Package says PC-2100 but inside... sticker on the chips says PC-2700 ! I run it @266 MHZ anyway but this may be a good news for others. Got it in Key West FL.
Warning, it would not mix with Kingston RAM .
 

Replay

Golden Member
Aug 5, 2001
1,366
72
91
Originally posted by: Subodim
Update: I'm testing another SpecTek "-6A" module right now (also 0306), and it's doing a little better. It got 4 errors in five passes at 166MHz, and so far it has gotten "only" 4 errors in seven passes at 133MHz. What do you think--is that stable enough for everyday use, or should I take it back to OM?
Take it back again. Don't accept any errors in Memtest86. It does seem a bit strange that you can even run at 166 then get errors at 133, but I had a stick do that in a picky mobo. Get a 3rd stick if you like, maybe different chips if possible. Or wait for some PNY, Kingston, etc (anything other than Spectek!) to go on sale.

VirtualLarry, the 216 Mhz Kingston PC2100 has USA on the pcb, but the usual no-brand chips, which could be from anywhere. I'm not up on the high-end ram, but the cheap rebate ram is usually much better than this Spectek stick.
 

Subodim

Member
Apr 7, 2004
38
0
0
I got another stick and tested it, and it didn't have any errors after twelve passes in Memtest-86 at 166MHz, so I figure I won't need to take it back. I voided the warranty by removing the second little sticker that was covering up the first little sticker, and guess what I found? The original sticker says "PC2700", just as I suspected.

I have mixed feelings about this deal. 3 out of 4 SpecTek "PC2100" modules I tested had errors at 133MHz, but the 4th one is error-free at 166MHz. I bought some other SpecTek PC2700 modules from Best Buy last month (one was sold by PNY), and they too are error-free (and they weren't rebadged as P2100 modules at the factory). Obviously, your mileage will vary when you buy SpecTek products.

Originally posted by: Replay
VirtualLarry, the 216 Mhz Kingston PC2100 has USA on the pcb, but the usual no-brand chips, which could be from anywhere.
I just bought some Kingston PC2700 that has Hynix "D43" chips. It runs error-free at 200MHz with timings set to 2-3-3-3, and it runs error-free at 220MHz with much higher timings. It makes me wonder if Kingston sells the same modules (with the Hynix label etched off) as "PC2100".

In any case, I completely agree with you that it's better to buy Kingston than to buy SpecTek.
 

ScrapSilicon

Lifer
Apr 14, 2001
13,625
0
0
Originally posted by: Goopster
returned mine last night because it had 184 pins i needed one with 168 pins. Lost $5 shipping in this deal.

why are you buying DDR when you are after SDRam..?got 2 rainchecks..;)
 

VirtualLarry

No Lifer
Aug 25, 2001
56,570
10,205
126
Originally posted by: Subodim
Originally posted by: Replay
VirtualLarry, the 216 Mhz Kingston PC2100 has USA on the pcb, but the usual no-brand chips, which could be from anywhere.

I just bought some Kingston PC2700 that has Hynix "D43" chips. It runs error-free at 200MHz with timings set to 2-3-3-3, and it runs error-free at 220MHz with much higher timings. It makes me wonder if Kingston sells the same modules (with the Hynix label etched off) as "PC2100".

That actually had occured to me, that possibly they were etching off the mfg to conceal the country-of-origin (Korea) of the original chips, because there was a tariff imposed recently on (I believe) Korean DRAM.

That, or they may also have wanted to prevent "poaching" of their lower-rated-DIMM retail stocks, people buying the higher-grade chips in the lower-speed packaging, and leaving the other packages there. This seems somewhat an unlikely reason though.

I'm quite pleasantly surprised that Replay was able to get the "generic" chips running at 200Mhz+ speeds. I probably didn't even need to return my stick, although the label on mine said "Made in China", not USA.

Originally posted by: SubodimIn any case, I completely agree with you that it's better to buy Kingston than to buy SpecTek.

Well.. possibly. It's best to know the mfg of the chips themselves, because as long as the DIMM PCB mfg is of decent quality, then it's primarily the chips themselves that determine the overall quality of the memory. I try to always use DIMMs with first-tier mfg chips on them. SpecTek is somewhere between 2nd- and 3rd-tier, IMO. (Maybe lower, I know that there are at least two grades of "Micron" DRAM, before you get down to "SpecTek" grades, but there might be three even. That would make SpecTek 4th-tier at best, hardly better than "generic", which seems to be backed up by the empirical results seen so far in this thread.) I would personally never try to set up a dual-channel rig using SpecTek memory.