so much for appeasing terrorists and pulling out of Iraq
Originally posted by: misle
My point is: Spain showed that they were willing to appease terrorists. Now more terrorists are attacking them to get what they want.
Originally posted by: misle
My point is: Spain showed that they were willing to appease terrorists.
Now more terrorists are attacking them to get what they want
Originally posted by: ReiAyanami
Originally posted by: misle
My point is: Spain showed that they were willing to appease terrorists.
You are the same folk that associates Iraq with 9/11. the true reason why the previous right wing government was thrown out was because they LIED to the people and tried to cover things up. the people revolted and threw out the LYING LIARS. too bad it doesn't work the same way here (this thing called democcracy). too bad it was interpreted the wrong way
Now more terrorists are attacking them to get what they want
ETA has been around for decades and decades, next thing you know, you'll be saying FARC is an Al Qaeda offshoot
Originally posted by: DashRiprock
so much for appeasing terrorists and pulling out of Iraq
These recent attacks have nothing to do with appeasing terrorists or Iraq, they're from separatists Basques.
Originally posted by: misle
My point is: Spain showed that they were willing to appease terrorists. Now more terrorists are attacking them to get what they want.
Originally posted by: misle
Originally posted by: DashRiprock
so much for appeasing terrorists and pulling out of Iraq
These recent attacks have nothing to do with appeasing terrorists or Iraq, they're from separatists Basques.
So, you are saying that the separatists Basques don't want anything? They just want to blow up gas station? That seems odd.
Originally posted by: JackStorm
Originally posted by: misle
My point is: Spain showed that they were willing to appease terrorists. Now more terrorists are attacking them to get what they want.
As other people have already pointed out. This has nothing to do with Iraq or the war on terror
Originally posted by: misle
Thank you. I pointed that out as well. Let me attempt to explain better, since some of you haven't figured it out:
Train bombings supposedly by Al Qaeda caused an administration change and caused Spain to pull out of Iraq. This means that this instance of Terrorism worked. -> Blow sh!t up, get what you want.
Now, another terrorist group (not related to Iraq or Al Qaeda) is doing the same fvcking thing! They are also expecting to get what they want because Spain appeased one terrorist group, so why not them as well?
Got it? Good.
Damn, didn't think it would be that freaking hard to figure out.
Originally posted by: JackStorm
Perhaps you should read up a bit about the Basques, this blowing things up thing and generally pissing the Spanish government off, isn't new. Even if the Iraq war hadn't happend and even if Al Qaeda hadn't attacked the U.S. Spain would still have these people to deal with. What Al Qaeda did is completely irrelivant to this issue of the Basques. Their problem with the Basques predates the whole Al Qaeda thing.
Originally posted by: misle
My point is: Spain showed that they were willing to appease terrorists. Now more terrorists are attacking them to get what they want.
Originally posted by: misle
They might think that if they step up there attacks to the levels of Al Qaeda, they will get what they want.
I am not aware of the severity of their previous attacks, so I might be off base.
Originally posted by: ELP
OMFG!
How many times do we have to go over this!
They didn't pull out to 'appease' the terrorists. They pulled out because they shouldn't have been there in the first place.
BEFORE THE WAR: The people of Spain were wholeheartedly against invading Iraq. The gov't went in anyway.
DURING THE WAR: The people of Spain were wholeheartedly against invading Iraq. They had elections and bitch-slapped the then-current gov't officials for NOT LISTENING TO THE PEOPLE.
The newly elected officials pulled out as they said they would. This was of course mandated by the people overwhelmingly.
Do you notice a trend?
There is and was no appeasement in any sense, by the people of Spain. It would have only been appeasement if they were for the war in the first place and then changed their minds FOR FEAR they would be retaliated against.
Originally posted by: misle
I guess that I'm assuming that the Basques have not attacked in this manner before, i.e.: bombing transit related locations (gas stations) during rush hour, as they doing now.
Originally posted by: misle
Originally posted by: ELP
OMFG!
How many times do we have to go over this!
They didn't pull out to 'appease' the terrorists. They pulled out because they shouldn't have been there in the first place.
BEFORE THE WAR: The people of Spain were wholeheartedly against invading Iraq. The gov't went in anyway.
DURING THE WAR: The people of Spain were wholeheartedly against invading Iraq. They had elections and bitch-slapped the then-current gov't officials for NOT LISTENING TO THE PEOPLE.
The newly elected officials pulled out as they said they would. This was of course mandated by the people overwhelmingly.
Do you notice a trend?
There is and was no appeasement in any sense, by the people of Spain. It would have only been appeasement if they were for the war in the first place and then changed their minds FOR FEAR they would be retaliated against.
Well, you are in Indiana, which is a little closer to Spain than Missouri, so I guess you would know about the sentiment in Spain better, right? 😛
I'm basing my argument on stories like this:
"Among the few that did well were Spain's Socialists, who recently withdrew troops from Iraq after a backlash over a March 11 terrorist attack."
As reported by CNN.
And:
"The government was swept from power amid public disenchantment with its policy on Iraq and its conduct following the Madrid train bombings, in which 200 people were killed and 1,400 injured."
As reported by the UK's Telegraph
They could be wrong, but they are saying the reason the Socialists party won was because of the bombings...
Originally posted by: misle
Originally posted by: ELP
OMFG!
How many times do we have to go over this!
They didn't pull out to 'appease' the terrorists. They pulled out because they shouldn't have been there in the first place.
BEFORE THE WAR: The people of Spain were wholeheartedly against invading Iraq. The gov't went in anyway.
DURING THE WAR: The people of Spain were wholeheartedly against invading Iraq. They had elections and bitch-slapped the then-current gov't officials for NOT LISTENING TO THE PEOPLE.
The newly elected officials pulled out as they said they would. This was of course mandated by the people overwhelmingly.
Do you notice a trend?
There is and was no appeasement in any sense, by the people of Spain. It would have only been appeasement if they were for the war in the first place and then changed their minds FOR FEAR they would be retaliated against.
Well, you are in Indiana, which is a little closer to Spain than Missouri, so I guess you would know about the sentiment in Spain better, right? 😛
I'm basing my argument on stories like this:
"Among the few that did well were Spain's Socialists, who recently withdrew troops from Iraq after a backlash over a March 11 terrorist attack."
As reported by CNN.
And:
"The government was swept from power amid public disenchantment with its policy on Iraq and its conduct following the Madrid train bombings, in which 200 people were killed and 1,400 injured."
As reported by the UK's Telegraph
They could be wrong, but they are saying the reason the Socialists party won was because of the bombings...