• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

South Park jesus/mohommad question?

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
It's because Muslims have proven to be unable to control themselves and they WILL blow something up if the episode gets shown.

I know it sounds discriminatory, but when's the last time you've seen a Buddhist monk hijacking an airliner/blowing up a building?

Typical ATOT disclaimer: of course not ALL Muslims are terrorists, but it seems that you don't find ANY Buddhists hijacking planes. Why not?
 
because its popular and socially acceptable to demean and insult christians for their faith, hasn't spread to muslims yet.
 
Originally posted by: iwearnosox

Anyone that doesn't include the word extremist in their discussions about terrorist/sucidal muslims are ignorant, imho. I wouldn't take their opinion seriously otherwise- .99999999% of muslims are peaceful folks outside of "standard wars." Whatever that means nowadays.
Click to expand...

Link


Hundreds of people in most of the protests. At least seven locations mentioned in this ONE article. Seems to be a larger percentage are extremists than you're indicating; assuming you meant 99.999999% and not 0.99999999% as you typed.

 
Originally posted by: DAGTA
Originally posted by: iwearnosox

Anyone that doesn't include the word extremist in their discussions about terrorist/sucidal muslims are ignorant, imho. I wouldn't take their opinion seriously otherwise- .99999999% of muslims are peaceful folks outside of "standard wars." Whatever that means nowadays.
Click to expand...

Link


Hundreds of people in most of the protests. At least seven locations mentioned in this ONE article. Seems to be a larger percentage are extremists than you're indicating; assuming you meant 99.999999% and not 0.99999999% as you typed.
Click to expand...

Protests are fine, they're an extension of freedom. I'm fine with people protesting, burning flags, hating america. There are 1.3 billion muslims in the world- trust me, if 99.99% of them were violent you'd be pretty dead by now.

Edit: yah, ok, that was my typo. We're on the same page, I think.

 
Originally posted by: iwearnosox
Uh, preventing a person from expressing an idea is censorship, it's pretty binary.

Citizen: "I'd like to tell people I hate the government."
Government: "Super. We've reviewed that and the answer is "say something else."
Citizen: "Damn."

It's actually pretty scary that you don't think the supression of an idea or thought isn't censorship, you really need to re-evaluate that.
Click to expand...
im just saying i seriously dont believe its that cut and dry. sure, there are examples of blatant censorship out there but there also many fine examples of free speech. i just dont think censorship is this great monster out in the hills that everyone makes it out to be. i think censhorship exists in many shapes and forms, but just because people dont see/hear what is implied to be seen or hyped up to be seen without all the details, then they shouldnt rush out to yell "censorship!". im just saying that i believe its a word that gets thrown around more times than necessary, and a lot of times without the whole story behind the whole incident.

i mean, you seem pretty set in your ways. and im just stating what i believe. to you censorship it seems like its exactly a definition as described in a dictionary. perhaps even verbatim. to me, its a little more complex than a couple sentences in a book.
 
Originally posted by: iwearnosox
Originally posted by: DAGTA
Originally posted by: iwearnosox

Anyone that doesn't include the word extremist in their discussions about terrorist/sucidal muslims are ignorant, imho. I wouldn't take their opinion seriously otherwise- .99999999% of muslims are peaceful folks outside of "standard wars." Whatever that means nowadays.
Click to expand...

Link


Hundreds of people in most of the protests. At least seven locations mentioned in this ONE article. Seems to be a larger percentage are extremists than you're indicating; assuming you meant 99.999999% and not 0.99999999% as you typed.
Click to expand...

Protests are fine, they're an extension of freedom. I'm fine with people protesting, burning flags, hating america. There are 1.3 billion muslims in the world- trust me, if 99.99% of them were violent you'd be pretty dead by now.
Click to expand...

Those were some of the protests were cars were burned and people were killed.

I didn't say 99.99% were violent. I said I disagree with your estimate that 99.999999% are NOT violent.
 
Forgetting the numbers...

OBVIOUSLY enough Muslims are violent that now the entire world is afraid to protect free speech. What other religion has a large enough number of violent members to scare the world?
 
Originally posted by: iwearnosox
Originally posted by: DAGTA
Forgetting the numbers...

OBVIOUSLY enough Muslims are violent that now the entire world is afraid to protect free speech. What other religion has a large enough number of violent members to scare the world?
Click to expand...

Oh, gee, I don't know...
Click to expand...

If we still lived in the times of the Crusades that would be relevant.
 
Originally posted by: chuckywang
Ok, for those who don't get it, here's their point:

They were trying to find a proportional response for the Muhammed cartoons for Christians. They were saying that portraying drawings of Muhammed is to Muslins what Jesus defecating on Bush/US Flag is to Christians!! Yes, both are equally offensive to their beliefs...that's their point! And yet, Comedy Central let them air the Jesus/Bush/Flag bit but not the Muhammed bit. Hence, Comedy Central is a hypocrite.
Click to expand...

Well put.
 
Originally posted by: DAGTA
Originally posted by: iwearnosox
Originally posted by: DAGTA
Originally posted by: iwearnosox

Anyone that doesn't include the word extremist in their discussions about terrorist/sucidal muslims are ignorant, imho. I wouldn't take their opinion seriously otherwise- .99999999% of muslims are peaceful folks outside of "standard wars." Whatever that means nowadays.
Click to expand...

Link


Hundreds of people in most of the protests. At least seven locations mentioned in this ONE article. Seems to be a larger percentage are extremists than you're indicating; assuming you meant 99.999999% and not 0.99999999% as you typed.
Click to expand...

Protests are fine, they're an extension of freedom. I'm fine with people protesting, burning flags, hating america. There are 1.3 billion muslims in the world- trust me, if 99.99% of them were violent you'd be pretty dead by now.
Click to expand...

Those were some of the protests were cars were burned and people were killed.

I didn't say 99.99% were violent. I said I disagree with your estimate that 99.999999% are NOT violent.
Click to expand...


Thats a really pointless argument...

 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top