Sounds Like I Have a Problem -- Or Do I?

Thoth093

Member
Jul 28, 2004
119
0
0
I'm getting my new computer tomorrow. I'm a wimp, so I'm having a local shop I've been using about 12 years now build it for me (hey -- that two year, total parts and labor warranty is cool, and believe me -- the price is actually competitive).

It's not going to be the fastest box on the planet. But it is sure not going to be the slowest, either. Athlon 64 3200, gig of good DDR3200 ram, SATA hard drive, and a good video card (9800 pro (256-bit version), which I probably plan to upgrade in about four-six months or so once AGP versions of the new generation of cards become plentiful and prices perhaps drop a notch.)*

All in all, I'm pretty pleased. But I forgot one thing -- a sound card.

The motherboard apparently has built-in audio, but I'm terribly skeptical. Every computer I've had to this point has had a sound card -- usually a good one. Back when I had my very first "exclusively for gaming PC," I was one of those guys who had a Soundblaster card AND a Roland MT-32 (later a GS) card under the hood. I LIKE sound.

A friend of mine who's a powergamer in extremis likes his onboard audio a lot and maintains that he had an Audigy 2 for a while and couldn't tell the difference, so he sold it. Of course, I wasn't in the market for a new machine at the time, otherwise none of this may have happened. ;)

I don't mind getting in under the hood of my machine, and I regularly do routine stuff like add optical drives, hard drives, add/remove cards, reinstall the OS and drivers, etc. So it ain't gonna be any big deal to pop in a sound card in the future if I want one. What I'm worried about is extreme performance hit right out of the box that I didn't anticipate. I understand that the onboard sound tends to use up CPU cycles, which might only make a few FPS difference here and there initially but I fear could grow as software becomes more complex.

Any advice? I do have an old SB Live! 5.1 card I could get them to slam into the rig until I can scrape together an extra $80 or so for an OEM Audigy 2. Ah, life on a reporter's salary. We're only rich in the movies, guys, I promise.

I digress. I often do.

Thoughts?

Brian

* I really wanted a 6800GT, but obviously have hit my budget (and my wife's final level of patience) of what I can spend now. I'm really interested in the 6600 series (especially, again, the GT) and might pick up an AGP version in November if it's clear there will be a real performance jump.
 

Elcs

Diamond Member
Apr 27, 2002
6,278
6
81
Im tempted to say stick with the onboard and if you do have trouble, you can spend money on a soundcard. The Audigy2 is the gamers choice for soundcards but Im unsure of what flavour.

Perhaps when he had his Audigy2, that his speaker system was poor. I know I upgraded from my Surround Sound speakers that came with my radio/cd player with a Creative Labs Inspire 5500 system and using my Soundstorm onboard sound, the difference was significant.
 

Maggotry

Platinum Member
Dec 5, 2001
2,074
0
0
I bought an ASUS A7N8X Deluxe a year ago. It has the nForce2 chipset. The on-board audio has a digital coax out which I use with my 5.1 setup. Sounds much better than my old SB Live or my Santa Cruz. I don't know if it's better than an Audigy2, but I don't care either. It sounds very good. I'm happy with it. Done. What mobo do you have?
 

Neurorelay

Platinum Member
Jul 21, 2004
2,195
0
0
With high CPU speeds, processor load will be negligble with onboard sound. However, while it may sound great, make sure it works well with all applications you plan to use; that may be the only reason to get a seperate sound card.
 

Depends on the board.

If it's one with a Soundstorm chipset, use it, especially if you can use the digital outs.