Sounds good to me

Status
Not open for further replies.

SirStev0

Lifer
Nov 13, 2003
10,449
6
81
He makes some really interesting points. I like that he is actually naming names. This is actually one of the first balanced things on Fox I have ever seen.

By the way ... when he was throwing shit around I was loling.
 

Farang

Lifer
Jul 7, 2003
10,913
3
0
No offense to you personally, but this guy appeals to the lowest common denominator. I'm at 3:00 and there is nothing of substance brought up unless you already have something against the word "earmarks," he has not brought up one substantive issue. The only other thing he brought up was that the bill was long.. well, no shit Glenn Beck, it is a goddamn $400+ billion dollar spending bill. I hope its long.
 

SirStev0

Lifer
Nov 13, 2003
10,449
6
81
Originally posted by: Farang
No offense to you personally, but this guy appeals to the lowest common denominator. I'm at 3:00 and there is nothing of substance brought up unless you already have something against the word "earmarks," he has not brought up one substantive issue. The only other thing he brought up was that the bill was long.. well, no shit Glenn Beck, it is a goddamn $400+ billion dollar spending bill. I hope its long.

you apparently missed when he was throwing shit around. It was just silly. If I remember correctly, this is the eyes guy. The one who used to have a camera so you can "look into his eyes".

What a riot.
 

quest55720

Golden Member
Nov 3, 2004
1,339
0
0
That is why we need some good old fashion gridlock. Both parties have shown if they have total control they will abuse the power. The republicans did it for 6 years now the democrats are doing it. Bring back some good old fashion gridlock like in the 90s to keep both parties in check.
 

Lemon law

Lifer
Nov 6, 2005
20,984
3
0
Originally posted by: quest55720
That is why we need some good old fashion gridlock. Both parties have shown if they have total control they will abuse the power. The republicans did it for 6 years now the democrats are doing it. Bring back some good old fashion gridlock like in the 90s to keep both parties in check.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

That is exactly not the point, the defective policies of GWB&co have created a potential to totally collapse the American economy.

The problem may stay manageable if unemployment does not go out of control,
but if we do not do something now and unemployment rises to 25%, its a whole different ballgame.

The quest55720 argument might apply during normal times, but these are not normal times.

Not every Presidential administration ens with a required total bail out of the banking system.
 

Ozoned

Diamond Member
Mar 22, 2004
5,578
0
0
Originally posted by: Lemon law
Originally posted by: quest55720
That is why we need some good old fashion gridlock. Both parties have shown if they have total control they will abuse the power. The republicans did it for 6 years now the democrats are doing it. Bring back some good old fashion gridlock like in the 90s to keep both parties in check.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

That is exactly not the point, the defective policies of GWB&co have created a potential to totally collapse the American economy.

The problem may stay manageable if unemployment does not go out of control,
but if we do not do something now and unemployment rises to 25%, its a whole different ballgame.

The quest55720 argument might apply during normal times, but these are not normal times.

Not every Presidential administration ens with a required total bail out of the banking system.
Which policy of GWB&co do you think directly led to the run-up in real estate valuations?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.