• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Sorry, you need to donate for good politics.

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Craig234 said:
No, I don't. I blamed Republicans for the Supreme Court Justices protecting the money.
Click to expand...

You started off your potentially good post with inflammatory language aimed at those of a different political party. This caused your post to lose any power it may have had - except with those who also feel the same way about that political party.
 
Craig234 said:
No, I don't. I blamed Republicans for the Supreme Court Justices protecting the money.
Click to expand...

Your first paragraph started the blame game.

The USSC decided because of the way the constitution was written and was not trying to pander to emotion.

You want it your way; anything else is corrupt.

Well had the corps been blocked; your union support should have been blocked also.

But that would not meet with your desires.

Your desires are not always correct
 
EagleKeeper said:
Your first paragraph started the blame game.

The USSC decided because of the way the constitution was written and was not trying to pander to emotion.

You want it your way; anything else is corrupt.

Well had the corps been blocked; your union support should have been blocked also.

But that would not meet with your desires.

Your desires are not always correct
Click to expand...

You're being idiotic. So you say the five Justices who votes 'corporations are people' were following the constitution, and the four who did not were not. Piece of crap argument.

Then you raise 'pander to emotion' which I did not say and is not the issue.

Then you post more BS putting words in my mouth. Just idiocy.
 
Craig234 said:
You're being idiotic. So you say the five Justices who votes 'corporations are people' were following the constitution, and the four who did not were not. Piece of crap argument.

Then you raise 'pander to emotion' which I did not say and is not the issue.

Then you post more BS putting words in my mouth. Just idiocy.
Click to expand...

You can not even read when someone challenges you opinion/ideals. Maybe you should move to Wisconsin; there is a clone of yours in Madison.

Can you show where in the constitution or current Federal law that corporations should be denied rights. Until then; they have the rights - they are owned by people and those people have the right to be hears.

You wanted them to rule otherwise because you feel that they were unfair - that sounds like emotion to me. Because you feel you opinion is correct (right) then they are wrong - they should have agreed with you. EMOTION

If you do not like the words you spit out of your mouth; then do not put them in
 
EagleKeeper said:
When one stops automatically blaming the other side and implying that their side can do no wrong.

Then money becomes less important and the responding fo the will of the people is what a politician will listen to.
Click to expand...
Their money buys you, it buys me. It especially buys the people that don't spend 15 hours/week spamming P&N like we do. Those people are bought hook line sinker on the cheap with 30 second ads. That is the root of the problem, they don't know any better because nobody with money is around to tell them.
 
EagleKeeper said:
You can not even read when someone challenges you opinion/ideals. Maybe you should move to Wisconsin; there is a clone of yours in Madison.

Can you show where in the constitution or current Federal law that corporations should be denied rights. Until then; they have the rights - they are owned by people and those people have the right to be hears.

You wanted them to rule otherwise because you feel that they were unfair - that sounds like emotion to me. Because you feel you opinion is correct (right) then they are wrong - they should have agreed with you. EMOTION

If you do not like the words you spit out of your mouth; then do not put them in
Click to expand...

You have the burden of proof wrong. I can't show you where the constitution says vampires should not get rights; the burden of proof is to show they should. More idiocy.
 
Last edited:
Doppel said:
Their money buys you, it buys me. It especially buys the people that don't spend 15 hours/week spamming P&N like we do. Those people are bought hook line sinker on the cheap with 30 second ads. That is the root of the problem, they don't know any better because nobody with money is around to tell them.
Click to expand...

Doppel, you're making a habit out of posting things I agree with.
 
Craig234 said:
You're being idiotic. So you say the five Justices who votes 'corporations are people' were following the constitution, and the four who did not were not. Piece of crap argument.

Then you raise 'pander to emotion' which I did not say and is not the issue.

Then you post more BS putting words in my mouth. Just idiocy.
Click to expand...

They did no such thing. They said they are US Persons.
 
Craig234 said:
You have the burden of proof wrong. I can't show you where the constitution says vampires should be denied rights; the burden of proof is to show they should. More idiocy.
Click to expand...


I think this shows his point nicely:

The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.
 
EagleKeeper said:
You can not even read when someone challenges you opinion/ideals. Maybe you should move to Wisconsin; there is a clone of yours in Madison.

Can you show where in the constitution or current Federal law that corporations should be denied rights. Until then; they have the rights - they are owned by people and those people have the right to be hears.

You wanted them to rule otherwise because you feel that they were unfair - that sounds like emotion to me. Because you feel you opinion is correct (right) then they are wrong - they should have agreed with you. EMOTION

If you do not like the words you spit out of your mouth; then do not put them in
Click to expand...
All Craig-post amusement aside, that's an excellent post, sir.
 
werepossum said:
All Craig-post amusement aside, that's an excellent post, sir.
Click to expand...

Even us old fogies can accomplish multiple actions with one jab.😛

I must give credit though to the quality of the foil :whiste: (Unsure of spelling, it may be fool :hmm🙂

The problem is that it will not match up with his requirements and therefore is "invalid"😉
 
Last edited:
Republican-"My country, right or wrong!"

Democrat-"Our country, right and left."

nuff said about the difference
 
What do you do when your views are so weak that you are afraid to hear the views of others? You place them on ignore!

Unless they are a mod. lol
 
Craig fails to understand that even 1/2 of Democrats here think he is a nutjob. If you think that the other side is evil and your side is not, then you have a problem.
 
Craig234 said:
"Sorry EagleKeeper is a moderator/admin and you are not allowed to ignore him or her"
Click to expand...

Another example of reading comprehension:biggrin:

1) When a person posts as themselves, they are a member
2) When they post as a moderator, they indicate it by signing the post/comments accordingly

AND
3)
Look at my title
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top