• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Sorry Natalie Portman Fans . . . .

jEnus

Senior member
Text

November 5, 2004 -- TO the dismay of "Star Wars" nerds everywhere, Natalie Portman (above) will not be nude in the upcoming Mike Nichols movie, "Closer." Portman, who plays Queen Amidala in the space epics, was supposed to bare all for her role as a stripper in "Closer," until she got cold feet and asked Nichols to cut the footage of her romping fully nude in a topless club. Unfortunately for Portmanphiles, Nichols agreed. "He wants to see my bare ass much less than [even] my father would," the actress tells Entertainment Weekly. "He's as or more protective of me than my parents are. So doing sexual, physical stuff for him felt very uncomfortable."
 
had no doubt she wasn't gonna to. just look at the trailer, it looked too sappy for nudity. plus she's rather flat and was shown in a bikini like deal..😛
 
Who gives a crap? If you wanna see her nude, just Google her name to get some nice, tasty nude beach pics 😀
 
ive seen topless shots of her from sunbathing or something? her body is really nothing special, overall she's just 'ok' in my book. cute face though. no this is not a geek 'SHE'S UGLY' post either.
 
FWIW, there's a HOT picture of her in the print version of today's NY Post. Unfortunately, they don't post pictures in the articles online.
 
Back
Top