Here is another lame attempt from Sony to justify the price of its PS3 to consumers. Its a comparison between the PS3 Premium and the 360 Core, adding features to the 360 Core that are "required" in order to compare it to the PS3 Premium. The 360 ends up being more expensive obviously. Using their comparison with the 360 Premium, which would make more sense, would make the package $50 cheaper. I guess Sony had to get every last bit of cash in to justify its PS3.
http://gaming.engadget.com/2006/10/19/s...60-requires-hd-dvd-etc-thus-costs-700/
Here's my comparison. The fact sheet shows that the PS3 will have a hard time doing Anti-Aliasing in all their games unlike the 360. The PS3 has no on-die memory, therefore it will sustain a huge performance hit when enabling Anti-Aliasing. The 360 will sustain a negligible performance hit.
http://gaming.engadget.com/2006/10/19/s...60-requires-hd-dvd-etc-thus-costs-700/
Here's my comparison. The fact sheet shows that the PS3 will have a hard time doing Anti-Aliasing in all their games unlike the 360. The PS3 has no on-die memory, therefore it will sustain a huge performance hit when enabling Anti-Aliasing. The 360 will sustain a negligible performance hit.